Why the .44 Special

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've often wondered what the appeal was myself and outside of the Charter Bulldog it doesn't do anything more than what .45 Colt or .45 ACP can. Of course going from .44 to .45 means the gun must be marginally bigger, which to some people is like asking them to go from carrying a J frame to an N frame.

I think a lot of the appeal stems from The Son of Sam spree killings and Dirty Harry making the .44 caliber out to be some uber lethal revolver caliber that was just far better than .38. Double action .45's were basically left alone with the milsurp S&W and Colt revolvers and in the 60s and 70s people were obsessed with magnums.

We didn't have the equipment and methods of measuring ballistics, nor the free and independent investigative media to distribute the results like we do now, so the result was that more speed and bigger bullets were the answer for more stopping power. So, because .44 Mag was too big a revolver back then people went with .44 Special in smaller revolvers, i.e. the Charter Bulldog, if they wanted more power than .38. It didn't hurt that you could shoot the .44 Special in the hot, new .44 Mag revolvers either.
 
I hotrod my .44 special gp100 a little with 240s at just over 950fps, and its a blast to shoot. While it wont equal the sheer energy of a .357 gp100, ill take the .44 anyday as a field gun.
Nice to know that you're loading your .44 Special to pressures beyond SAAMI spec. Just validates my beliefs as to why Ruger stopped producing the .44 GP100 as a standard catalogue item.
 
Howdy

Why the 44 Special? Because it has been around since 1908, unlike the 44 Magnum, which is a relative newcomer, having first been chambered by S&W in 1955.

The 44 Special was the next development in S&W 44 caliber cartridges after the 44 Russian, which first appeared around 1871. The 44 Russian was what the Russians required of S&W for their massive contracts with the firm. S&W eventually produced around 150,000 Russian revolvers, most going to Czarist Russia, but some went to Turkey and Japan.

This is a S&W Russian 1st Model. Visually identical to the 44 American model, the only difference is the chambers were cut for the 44 Russian cartridge, rather than the 44 S&W American cartridge. The American round used a heeled bullet, meaning the OD of the bullet was the same as the OD of the brass. A smaller diameter 'heel' at the rear of the bullet was inserted into the case and crimped. Check out a 22 Rim Fire round some time if you want to see a round loaded with a heeled bullet. Notice that the waxy bullet lubricant is on the outside of the bullet. The 'outside lubricated' bullet was a problem with heeled bullets, the soft bullet lube used at the time tended to attract dirt and other contamination. So the Russians specified a round with the same dimensions as the 44 S&W American, except with a heeled bullet.

pl6Wef70j.jpg




Here is a S&W Russian 2nd Model with some period 44 Russian ammunition. Notice the large, pointy hump on the rear of the grip, and the spur on the trigger guard, both features that the Russians specified for the Russian Model revolvers.

poZxQVGxj.jpg




Left to right in this photo are a 44 S&W American round, a vintage 44 Russian, a modern factory 44 Russian, one of my 44 Russian reloads, a 44 Special and a 44 Magnum. You can see on the 44 American round how the bullet is the same diameter as the cartridge case. You can also see a lube groove on the bullet. Most of the lube has disappeared over the years, but a tiny amount remains. So when the 44 Russian round was first produced, the bullet was a smaller diameter than the case, so it could be inserted into the case and crimped with the lube contained in grooves not exposed to contamination. Which by the way is why the 44 Russian, 44 Special, and 44 Magnum round all have bullet diameters of .429. So they could fit inside a case basically the same size as the old 44 American round.

pojxnXjLj.jpg




The 44 Russian was a very popular cartridge with Smith and Wesson, in addition to the Russian models, the New Model Number Three and the 44 Double Action were chambered for it, and 44 Russian was the most common chambering for both of these models.

Here is a pair of New Model Number Threes both chambered for 44 Russian:

pnIVU3B0j.jpg




And here is a pair of 44 Double Actions both chambered for 44 Russian:

pl8SNg6Kj.jpg




I have gotten a little bit off topic, but bear with me. The case length of the 44 Russian round was nominally .970. It carried 23 grains of Black Powder under a 246 grain bullet.

In 1908, S&W produced the 44 Hand Ejector, 1st Model, also known as the New Century, but most commonly known by its nickname, the Triple Lock.

This is a very early one, Roy Jinks, the S&W historian told me it shipped in 1907. Almost all the blue is worn off, and the grips are very worn. Notice the cartridge name stamped on the barrel simply says 44 S&W CTG. (CTG means Cartridge) Later versions say 44 S&W Special CTG on the barrel.

pmKfgwaLj.jpg




This nickel plated Triple Lock shipped the last year of production, in 1915.

pnzWkyxUj.jpg




This target model shipped in 1913.

pnc5uYxuj.jpg




In this photo, the 3rd lock, or latch, can be seen protruding out of the barrel underlug. The conventional latch that engaged the front end of the extractor rod is also visible in the recess in the under lug. Actually, both of these latches were one U shaped piece. When the rod inside the extractor rod pushed the upper latch forward, it also released the lower latch.

plwphxcLj.jpg




Here is a view of the hardened insert in the yoke that received the 3rd Latch.

pozkyOksj.jpg




Smith and Wesson introduced the 44 Special cartridge with the Triple Lock. The case length of the new cartridge was 1.160. In all other aspects, bullet diameter, case diameter, rim diameter, and rim thickness, the 44 Special was identical to the 44 Russian. Why the extra .190 of case length? There is some controversy about that. Some say it was so an extra 3 grains of Black Powder could be stuffed into the cartridge. Others say the latching mechanism of the Triple Lock was too precise and Black Powder fouling would have been gummed up 3rd latch.

In any case, that was the birth of the 44 Special.




S&W ceased production of the 44 Hand Ejector 1st Model (Triple Lock) in 1915 and introduced the 44 Hand Ejector 2nd Model. The 3rd latch was gone, never to be produced again. The 44 HE 2nd Model had a conventional lock up with the cylinder latching at the rear and at the front of the ejector rod. Also gone was the large underbarrel lug, replaced by a more conventional under lug that simply housed the spring and plunger for the front latch. Why did Triple Lock production stop? One reason is cost. The Triple Lock sold for $21, which was a lot of money in 1908. The 44 HE 2nd Model, without the fancy extra latch sold for $19. Snooping around for inflation calculators I found that $21 in 1908 equaled $605.12 in 2019. $19 in 1915 equaled $486.41 in 2019. Much of that difference can be attributed to the lack of the 3rd latch. (sorry, I did not find an inflation calculator that went back to 1908 and up to 2020).

This 44 HE 2nd Model shipped in 1921.

pmyYUXqEj.jpg




This one has a bit more wear on it, it too shipped in 1921.

poVNFDm1j.jpg




In 1926, due to popular demand, S&W reintroduced the large underbarrel lug with the 44 Hand Ejector 3rd Model. Sometimes known as the Wolf & Klar Model after the large Texas dealer that requested it. The large underlug became a staple with many of the Magnum S&W revolvers. There was no return to the 3rd latch, still only 2 latches. This very worn old 3rd Model is one on my favorite 44 Special revolvers. It shipped in 1929 and was carried by an officer in WWII. This one has been refinished, witness the nickel plated hammer and trigger. Still, it is one of my favorite 44 Specials.

pn2hUU6Xj.jpg




This 44 Hand Ejector 4th Model Target shipped in 1955. I looked for a Model 24, the successor to the 44 HE 4th Model, for years, but they are scarce as hen's teeth. I stopped looking when I found this 44 HE 4th Model.

pmWMlnKhj.jpg




Lastly, rounding out my stable of 44 Special revolvers is this Model 624 that shipped in 1985.

poT2G7IDj.jpg




So, that's why 44 Special. So much cooler than 44 Magnum. Yes, you can fire 44 Special in any 44 Mag, but any revolver designed specifically for 44 Special will be lighter to carry and point.

Regarding reloading 44 Special for your brother, tell him to start reloading himself. I never shoot handloads loaded by anybody but me in any of my revolvers.
 
Last edited:
I've always liked the history behind the .44 Special (1907) as well as the .38 Special (1898), .357 Mag. (1935) and .45 Colt (1873). I loved reading about Elmer Keith's experiences with the .44 Special as well with John Taffin's account as related earlier in Tony_the_tiger's post. When I reload for the .44 Special I'm part off the history behind it and the future of it.
 
Ruger knows most of the buyers/owners of the .44 GP are reloaders and that they're reloading them above max SAAMI pressure ratings and it's accelerating the wear on the revolvers which will lead to returns for service that Ruger doesn't want to pay for.
interesting theory, not one id ever considered. Ever check with ruger on it? id be curious what the official reason given is
 
Last edited:
A revolver in 44 Special exceeds the sum of its parts. I am not sure why, but people like Jelly Bryce knew. However, even he went to 357 Magnum.

I do prefer my 44's to be in 44 Magnum. It's not that I prefer 44 Magnum, it's that the gun is built for hot cartridges. 44 Special really does well on The Five Yard Roundup, but 44 Magnum (with 240 grains @1210 FPS) does not. Being completely objective about it means carrying 44 Special over 44 Magnum for personal defense against humans.

That said, I really like the Georgia Arms 240 grain FMJ @1000 FPS load. It shoots like 44 Special and is good on the follow-up shots. It just needs a JHP bullet tuned for that velocity. I think it'd be a great carry round.
 
Real question because I don't know, does there exist a 44 special that has a scaled frame JUST for 44 special? and is there one that also retains 6 shot capability?
Oh yes! The best balanced platform is a Colt SAA, mid-frame Blackhawk or New Frontier sized single action. Light like a .45 but capable of the 1200fps Keith load with a broad safety margin. Like this custom Ruger.....

IMG_7120e.jpg

This New Model Ruger.....

IMG_7535b.jpg

These Cimarrons.....

IMG_9572b.jpg

This USFA.....

IMG_2983b.jpg


Nice to know that you're loading your .44 Special to pressures beyond SAAMI spec. Just validates my beliefs as to why Ruger stopped producing the .44 GP100 as a standard catalogue item.
There you go with that half-cocked theory again. Funny thing, if that were true, it'd be the first time for Ruger to care about what handloaders do. Seems to me they'd first want to stop producing mid-frame .45's as that'd be the first, biggest potential issue. Because "Ruger only" .45Colt is FAR more popular than any heavy .44Spl load and FAR more detrimental to the wrong guns.

Doesn't have a damned thing to do with Son of Sam or Dirty Harry. You need to read more Keith, Taffin, Skeeter, Pearce, etc..
 
There you go with that half-cocked theory again. Funny thing, if that were true, it'd be the first time for Ruger to care about what handloaders do. Seems to me they'd first want to stop producing mid-frame .45's as that'd be the first, biggest potential issue. Because "Ruger only" .45Colt is FAR more popular than any heavy .44Spl load and FAR more detrimental to the wrong guns.

Doesn't have a damned thing to do with Son of Sam or Dirty Harry. You need to read more Keith, Taffin, Skeeter, Pearce, etc..
It's not a half cocked theory, it's fully cocked. :)

It's been well documented by others that the new Vaquero and the smaller frame .45's are not capable of handling Ruger Only .45 Colt. Anyone who attempts shooting those guns with hot .45 should be aware of the danger of doing so.

The .44 GP is different, it was new and unproven in terms of its longevity and has had QC issues with oversize throats (which after having seen the oversize throats on the Ruger .327's, I think I know why they did that with the .44 GP: to reduce stress on the cylinder and frame in the event of people hot rodding .44 Special.) and, I mean, I don't agree with them doing that, but I understand why they did it.

As for why the .44 Spl is popular, you can't not give some contribution thanks to popular opinion based on media with Dirty Harry and David Berkowitz. That's not to say the gun writers of the day didn't have a lot to do with it either, they were the driving force behind .44 Mag, but the .44 Special was not popular until .44 Mag came about, not among the casual gun owning American. Without .44 Mag and Dirty Harry, I don't think Charter would go on to make the Bulldog, which becomes the one of the best selling handguns of the 70s and 80s.

So, IMO, the popularity of .44 Spl is linked to the popularity of .44 Mag.
 
Ruger knows most of the buyers/owners of the .44 GP are reloaders and that they're reloading them above max SAAMI pressure ratings and it's accelerating the wear on the revolvers which will lead to returns for service that Ruger doesn't want to pay for.
Taurus offers a similarly sized 5 shot .44Mag. The Cyl is actually smaller in dia, and fluted. The GPs do have a fairly thin forcing cone as compared to my 44SBH, but otherwise seems plenty robust. Im honestly curious and would like to explore the idea that the GPs arnt robust enough for continual use with heavy (ish) loads.
Mostly because I plan on buying a 10mm and rechambering it to 10mm Magnum, and if the gun wears out fine, but i dont want it wearing out in a few thousand rounds.
 
But are they? It seems most 44 Specials are 6 shot 357s modified into 5 shot 44 spls or 44 mags just modified into 44 special only ??!! Or in the case of the S&W N frame which was originally designed for the 44 special, it was apparently designed way too long as 44 mag seems to fit as well. Maybe im looking at this thing wrong?

Real question because I don't know, does there exist a 44 special that has a scaled frame JUST for 44 special? and is there one that also retains 6 shot capability?


My CA Boomer .44 Special is pretty scaled down, and seriously not a lot bigger than a J frame S&W...


juma_grips1405.jpg
 
Taurus offers a similarly sized 5 shot .44Mag. The Cyl is actually smaller in dia, and fluted. The GPs do have a fairly thin forcing cone as compared to my 44SBH, but otherwise seems plenty robust. Im honestly curious and would like to explore the idea that the GPs arnt robust enough for continual use with heavy (ish) loads.
Mostly because I plan on buying a 10mm and rechambering it to 10mm Magnum, and if the gun wears out fine, but i dont want it wearing out in a few thousand rounds.
I had a similar thought when I found out that there was such a thing as 10mm Magnum, but decided against it because it would violate the warranty and because it's unproven. Yeah, you can probably shoot 1000 rds of 10mm Mag no problem, but beyond that you don't know how long it can last.

When Ruger made the GP100 in the 80s they had no interest at the time to offer it in a caliber other than .357.
 
... If I were more of a revolver guy one of the smaller framed 44 Specials would be in my safe.
I have 2 of the CA Bulldogs.

In cold weather they sometimes come with me on jaunts into "civilization", one in each of the 2 side pockets of a heavy coat. ;)

I am always keeping an eye out for a Rossi 720 but, alas, I fear that the stars will never align. <sigh>

Fit'n'Finish on the CAs is, um, disappointing, but they have proven to be reliable and, what I deem to be, accurate enough.
 
Ruger knows most of the buyers/owners of the .44 GP are reloaders and that they're reloading them above max SAAMI pressure ratings and it's accelerating the wear on the revolvers which will lead to returns for service that Ruger doesn't want to pay for.

But they are not worried about folks overloading the Super Blackhawk, Super Redhawk, Blackhawk, Vaquero, New Vaquero, or any other revolver they build or built that has a cartridge that can be reloaded by the end user?


Kevin
 
It's not a half cocked theory, it's fully cocked. :)

It's been well documented by others that the new Vaquero and the smaller frame .45's are not capable of handling Ruger Only .45 Colt. Anyone who attempts shooting those guns with hot .45 should be aware of the danger of doing so.

The .44 GP is different, it was new and unproven in terms of its longevity and has had QC issues with oversize throats (which after having seen the oversize throats on the Ruger .327's, I think I know why they did that with the .44 GP: to reduce stress on the cylinder and frame in the event of people hot rodding .44 Special.) and, I mean, I don't agree with them doing that, but I understand why they did it.

As for why the .44 Spl is popular, you can't not give some contribution thanks to popular opinion based on media with Dirty Harry and David Berkowitz. That's not to say the gun writers of the day didn't have a lot to do with it either, they were the driving force behind .44 Mag, but the .44 Special was not popular until .44 Mag came about, not among the casual gun owning American. Without .44 Mag and Dirty Harry, I don't think Charter would go on to make the Bulldog, which becomes the one of the best selling handguns of the 70s and 80s.

So, IMO, the popularity of .44 Spl is linked to the popularity of .44 Mag.
It's a theory with no supporting evidence, plain and simple.

Your theory about Berkowitz and Dirty Harry are also unfounded. Dirty Harry certainly contributed to the popularity of the .44Mag N-frame but not the .44Spl. For example, the .44 Special we always wanted Ruger to build was a mid-frame Blackhawk. This has nothing to do with a serial killer or movie cop but can be directly attributed to Elmer Keith and Skeeter Skelton, then subsequently John Taffin and Brian Pearce. Which is what Ruger first built, once a distributor ordered them. As I said before, you need to read their works. It'll cure a lot of the weird ideas you have about this stuff.

The .44Spl GP was not dropped (check Lipsey's) because of some silly concern about handloading. It was dropped for lack of sales. In effect, the .44Special is NOT popular, never has been. Certainly not among the "casual gun owning American". Its following is small but devoted. It's not for "casual" shooters. A lot of people don't understand the appeal (clearly!) and think if you want to shoot .44Spl, you do so in a .44Mag. As Taffin likes to say, "for those who understand, no explanation is necessary; for those who do not, none is possible". Truer words were never spoken.
 
It’s a great round with a ton of history. I find reloading the .44 Spl for my GP and 629’s and .38 Spl for my J,K and L frames and Colt Cobra/Officers Model far outstrips the satisfaction I get loading .44 Mag and .357 Mag. It’s like cruising with the top down in the right lane and enjoying the whole experience rather than throttling it up and flying down the fast lane all day. Yeah, you get there faster but you’re no better for it.

Teach a newbie to the .44 Spl. how to reload for it, one box loaded and they’ll be hooked!

Stay safe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top