mljdeckard
Member
I wasn't aware that SA 1911s were ever IN trials against Beretta or S&W autos for a military contract. The contract that was awarded to Beretta was for a double-action 9mm pistol. In any event, that was over 20 years ago, and every pistol category has improved greatly, including 'vintage' design SA autos. Kimber didn't exactly fall apart in the trials for LAPD SWAT. In 1992, I switched out my unit's 1911A1s on WWII frames for new Berettas. I IMMEDIATELY had to start sending them back to support for problems, failure to feed, failure to extract, and soldiers taking them apart, playing with them, and damaging springs. I remember thinking, "These things aren't going to be around too long."
My Kimber has functioned flawlessly for three years. I had a Para Ordnance P-12 that I didn't shoot very much, but I never had a problem with it. I had a Thompson/Auto Ordnance 1911A1 that was junk.
GI 1911s are made to function with one kind of ammo. I'm going to suppose that a lot of these problems arise when people use non factory ammo that is something besides 230 FMJ. If this is not the case, then perhaps Springfield's quality needs to be questioned. I did my homework before I bought my Kimber, I have seen no reason to switch to anything else. I hate homework. $630 NIB.
My Kimber has functioned flawlessly for three years. I had a Para Ordnance P-12 that I didn't shoot very much, but I never had a problem with it. I had a Thompson/Auto Ordnance 1911A1 that was junk.
GI 1911s are made to function with one kind of ammo. I'm going to suppose that a lot of these problems arise when people use non factory ammo that is something besides 230 FMJ. If this is not the case, then perhaps Springfield's quality needs to be questioned. I did my homework before I bought my Kimber, I have seen no reason to switch to anything else. I hate homework. $630 NIB.