WI: Wisconsin Gun Owners (WGO) is trouble

Status
Not open for further replies.

Monkeyleg

Member.
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
5,057
Location
Decatur, AL
There's a fairly new organization in the state, WGO, that's been causing major headaches for those of us who want shall-issue concealed carry passed.

While Wisconsin Gun Owners (WGO) goals are laudible, they're also impossible: they want Wisconsin to go from one of only four states to prohibit concealed carry, to Vermont style carry.

On top of that, they claim that the permitting system is a gun registration scheme.

The problem is that the director, Corey Graff, has been harassing friends of ours in Madison. It's very conceivable that the WGO could actually put off legislators who in the past have supported concealed carry. WGO is almost doing more harm than the anti-gunners.

Given the fact that we're already facing a tough fight with Governor Doyle, WGO's actions are a real problem.

Here's the email they sent out today:

CONCEALED CARRY EMERGENCY!

Analysis of (anti-gun) Personal Protection Act (PPA) - concealed carry bill

WGO dubs it: "The Gun Owner Disarmament Act of 2005" ˆ NRA, state politicians
cut backroom deals for gun control bill, pass it off as concealed carry

October 3, 2005

Dear Second Amendment Friend:

This is a concealed carry emergency!

This alert is so important we're sending it out again in case you missed it:
That's because the Personal Protection Act (PPA) contains numerous gun control
concessions.

And while I'm pretty sure you're already a member of Wisconsin Gun Owners, Inc.
(WGO) - with our staff working around the clock to expose and fight the
anti-gun sections of this carry bill, I haven't had time to check for sure.

If your WGO membership is not active, DO NOT WAIT to join or renew - goto
http://www.wisconsingunowners.org and click on "join wgo" in the left hand
column for quick, safe and secure donation.

If you're not a WGO member, you need to join quick - to receive our Fall 2005
newsletter, The Wisconsin Gun Owner - to get the FULL story and strategy on how
we - along with our Washington D.C. equivalent Gun Owners of America (GOA) plan
to pass a REAL concealed carry law in our state.

Frankly, this is the fight we've really been preparing for ˆ and I'm afraid the
enemy is much closer than expected.

The draft of the Personal Protection Act (PPA) ˜ a shall-issue carry-by-permit
bill ˜ was finally reintroduced in the state legislature: And it is a gun
control monster - much WORSE than last session's bill.

The big delay, it turns out, was that politicians were busy adding an additional
gun control provision to the bill with two thumbs up from NRA lobbyists who
helped draft the bill (see H.R. 218 provision below).

And while WGO expected to see some anti-gun concessions, the bill was instead
HEAVILY loaded down with massive gun control.

Last session, activists from Wisconsin Gun Owners, Inc. (WGO) and Gun Owners of
America (GOA) lobbied state Representative Scott Gunderson (R-Union Grove) and
State Senator Dave Zien (R-Eau Claire) to remove gun owner registration
language which would register gun owners who applied for a permit to carry with
the state Department of Justice (DOJ).

Instead of listening to you ˆ your calls, petitions, e-mails - Gunderson and
Zien are rubbing your nose in it ˆ by EXPANDING DOJ's role in the concealed
carry permit process.

Apparently, to them, your opinion doesn't matter.

The 2003-04 previous version of the bill proposed that permits would be issued
by county sheriffs, with Department of Justice doing a criminal background
check and registering gun owners into a DOJ "computerized list."

WGO opposed that background check and gun owner registration list, saying it was
an infringement of the right to bear arms, and treated gun owners like
criminals.

It would also make passing a clean Vermont-Alaska-type bill later virtually
impossible.

Rather than remove that gun control, Zien and Gunderson - hailed as pro-gun
heroes by some, but responsible for authoring the PPA, one of the most
aggressive gun control bills to face Second Amendment proponents in some time ˜
now want DOJ to issue carry permits as well.

That means you will have to beg the FBI, BATFE and other historically anti-gun
bureaucracies under DOJ who will be graciously granting you your "right" to
bear arms permission slip.

As I told a reporter yesterday at the State Capital press conference: The real
issue isn‚t reduced crime (that‚s a tangential benefit to CCW) - the right to
bear arms is the ultimate check against governmental tyranny. If you give
government the ability to regulate that check and balance, you simply destroy
that check and balance.

That means that if the PPA as it is written becomes law, you will lose more of
your gun rights than you will gain.

In fact, many analysts believe multiple CCW issues being heard by the State
Supreme Court right now could result in "unintended consequences" ˆ ushering in
a Vermont/Alaska-type concealed carry law, in which no permits, lists, fees,
training requirements or other gun controls would be required to carry.

That would be an ideal situation: to repeal Wisconsin‚s misguided ban on
carrying concealed weapons outright.

On the other hand, by passing the PPA in its current form, gun owners may be
jeopardizing their chances of ever restoring their right to bear arms fully in
this state.

But State Senator Dave Zien is using the possibility of a Vermont-carry case law
precedent coming down from the State Supreme Court as a threat to usher in the
PPA (and all its anti-gun provisions) ˆ indicating to many analysts that he and
other so-called "pro-gun" politicians oppose Vermont-carry, despite their
claims.

Here‚s what state politicians don't want you to know about the Personal
Protection Act:

? The draft bill will create a massive, EXPANDED gun owner registration
scheme with the state Department of Justice (DOJ) ˆ giving government agents
full access to the list of names of anyone they deem 'suspicious.' And you can
bet these agencies ˜ who routinely redefine what constitutes a "terrorist" in
the hysteria of the day ˜ will regard people who carry guns as a threat.
Prepare to be regarded as extremist.

? The draft bill will give cops who pull you over an instant alert that
you are a permit holder and may be armed. The Appleton, Wisconsin police chief
has already said that he will inform his officers to "draw their weapons" on
all permit holders detained during routine traffic stops. Obviously this
militates strongly against the DOJ list and permit system in favor of a clean
Vermont bill, but apparently the authors of the bill don't think you're smart
enough to figure that out.

? The draft bill will create vast new NO-CARRY AREAS in which you may not
enter if you are armed. If you enter one of these NO GUN OWNERS ALLOWED areas
unintentionally or to help someone being attacked, you could be prosecuted and
face imprisonment and permanent confiscation of ALL your guns ˆ not just your
carry sidearm. The authors of the PPA are also encouraging business owners to
post "No Carry Allowed" signs ˆ stigmatizing law-abiding gun owners in a
segregation-like atmosphere.

? The draft bill will create the state framework to implement H.R. 218 ˆ
the "Retired Cops-Only" concealed carry federal bill. Cops-only concealed carry
is opposed by over two dozen staunch gun rights organizations because it
creates special classes of citizens, elevating the value of the life of a
retired police officer above that of "ordinary" citizens ˆ a typical situation
under totalitarian regimes, not a free constitutional republic.

? State politicians and NRA lobbyists cut these backroom deals without
consulting WGO or GOA ˆ knowing full well grassroots gun owners would oppose
the language. When pressed today about this, State Senator Dave Zien dodged the
issue and double-spoke, saying, "Well, at least it's introduced now." If the
draft bill becomes law without removing the gun control provisions, a dangerous
precedent will be set in which politicians will not heed the admonitions of
their pro-gun constituents but instead will cut backroom gun control deals with
NRA leadership for small gains and huge gun rights losses.

A few hours after introduction of the draft, the Wisconsin Concealed Carry
Association (WCCA) issued a statement that these gun control changes are
"important."

Regretably, we cannot count on the institutional gun lobby to clean up this
bill.

I hope you agree with WGO that these changes ˆ which make last session's bad CCW
bill look mild by comparison ˆ are in fact deplorable, even unacceptable.

So you and I are the only force standing in the way of what we're more
appropriately calling the "Gun Owner Disarmament Act of 2005."

If you don't believe that creating a government list of gun owners can be
abused, then you must not have noticed that New Orleans police and BATFE agents
conducted door-to-door gun confiscations just a couple weeks ago: victimizing
the victims.

Creating a list of avid pro-gun people who are sure to own guns (and know how to
use them) is exactly the type of list which will be abused in "times of crisis"
to disarm you by force.

We must clean up the PPA. We must pass CLEAN concealed carry.

There simply is no other option.

To do so, be prepared for the political fight of your life - and vital action
alerts very soon.

ACTION:

If your WGO membership isn't active, you simply aren't in the fight.

If you are a WGO member, prepare to hunker down in the trenches.


Corey Graff, Executive Director

P.S. - WGO is a 501(c)4 non profit organization and the ONLY gun rights
organization in Wisconsin endorsed by Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America.
That's because when it comes to your gun rights, we will NEVER be bought off
and will NEVER budge an inch. The PPA in its current form is simply too
insulting for words, but we need you to make sure your WGO membership is active
- so we can alert you with mail action alerts that will be critical to fighting
the gun control provisions politicians seem intent on sneaking past you and
grassroots gun owners. Please join today if you haven't already. Time is not a
luxury we have. If your membership is active, accept my thanks in advance. If
not, Join Now: http://www.wisconsingunowners.org

P.P.S - If you're a supporter of gun control and would like to be removed from
this list, simply reply with "Remove" in the subject line.


Corey Graff, Executive Director

Wisconsin Gun Owners Inc.
P.O. Box 338
Green Bay, WI 54305

http://www.wisconsingunowners.org

[phone] 888.202.1645
[fax] 866.208.1346
[e-mail] [email protected]

"Wisconsin's Only No-Compromise Gun Rights Organization"
 
Are they aware of the history of Alaska's carry law evolution?

It started with permits, a list the police could pull up on traffic stops, requirement to inform, training and fingerprints and photo.

There were several amendments that gradually loosened the restrictions until we got Vermont-style.

All the traditional stuff.

The opposition has been using death of a thousand cuts against us for decades. We need to do the same in reverse rather than holding out for the unlikely clean sweep win.
 
The opposition has been using death of a thousand cuts against us for decades. We need to do the same in reverse rather than holding out for the unlikely clean sweep win.
Seriously. "Call your congressman! Have him oppose ____ because it doesn't also repeal the NFA!!!!"

That is not the way to achieve anything.
 
Are there goals truly impossible?

If you can't get Vermont style carry, why bother?

I guess some CCW is better than none (although the SA trumps all)

Anyway I do believe the permit scheme IS a registration scheme.
 
Grrreaaaat. :scrutiny:

Now all the toothless paranoid goons who wouldn't fill out legislator postcards at gunshows for me on behalf of the PPA in 2003, because: "Da' gubmint gonna have me onna list!" have thier own personal lobby. Wonderful.

Vermont carry is a laudable goal, but I swear that some jokers take such a "principaled" stand because they're too lazy to take a class at thier local gun store, pay $75, and fill out some forms.

I only pray that the "other side" has just as many morons on it. Those who alienate the public by only supporting the banning of all guns, what is thier equivalent? Somehow I doubt that any significant portion of the antis refuse to support incramental gun banning because it "dosen't go far enough".

I've now got four new reasons to want the PPA to pass...

www.walkowiaks.com
 
Maybe they will help make you guys look "more reasonable" and help get ccw passed as a compramise between what you have now and "Vermont carry."
 
LAR-15, Vermont style is a worthy goal. But it simply isn't possible in Wisconsin, one of the last states to completely prohibit concealed carry.

For one thing, there isn't a single legislator who would even dare to introduce a Vermont style bill. I've already asked. It would be political suicide. As it is, the press is going after Zien and Gunderson every chance they get, and not just on concealed carry. The Milwaukee Journal is out to get Zien in particular.

On top of that, no legislator would vote for a Vermont style bill. The bill we have now already contains concessions to so-called "conservative" legislators.

If Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Arizona--all very conservative states--require permits, nobody who knows Wisconsin would ever think that our state could go from no carrying to no permits.

As for it being a registration scheme, the bill only creates a registry of those who voluntarily get permits. And there's no information about guns, just the names of those who have permits.

That's the case in the 37 shall-issue states: names of permit holders are kept at some level of government.

dustind, I wish the WGO was making us look more reasonable, but they're not. The press isn't paying any attention to them. But some gun owners are, and the WGO's emails are peeling away some supporters that we really need. And that is a serious problem.

I've talked to Corey Graff and, in the end, we just had to agree to disagree. He and I both want the same thing--Vermont style carry--but disagree as to how to achieve it. I like to think that my approach, and the approach of other WCCA volunteers, is more realistic.
 
Politics is the art of the possible.

Otto Von Bismarck,
Aug. 11, 1867

Politics is not holding your breath like a baby having a tantrum, wishing for the impossible.

AJ Dual
Oct. 4, 2005
 
"If you can't get Vermont style carry, why bother?"

Uh, so you can carry legally while you're working on getting Vermont-style carry? Now you know.

John
 
Sometimes I just wish gun owners were as smart as the anti's

---------quote---------------
Politics is not holding your breath like a baby having a tantrum, wishing for the impossible.
------------------------------

Very true.

To me, the tagline in the email above says it all: "no compromise" means "never going to accomplish anything in politics."

Getting ANY kind of CCW in Wisconsin would be a HUGE step forward. If the "no compromise" holdouts don't want to be on the list, they don't have to apply for a permit.

Ironically, if the "no compromise" group ever gets what they want, it will most likely be because of the efforts of the practical, politically savvy gun groups they are opposing so strenuously.

The only possible scenario where Wisconsin winds up with Vermont-style carry is if they get a more restrictive style of carry law first then gradually chip away at the restrictions. RKBA advocates are following this pattern in many states successfully.

Name one state that went from "NO CARRY, EVER!" to Vermont/Alaska style carry laws all in one fell swoop. Oh, whoops... even Alaska didn't do that!

This is one area where the anti's are much smarter and more effective than we are. When they passed the AWB, you didn't get splintered-off "no compromise" anti groups standing up to oppose the AWB because it wasn't a total ban of all guns. Instead, their position was, "we support this law, even though it isn't 100% what we wanted, and we look forward to adding more restrictions in the future."

The anti groups are able to rally around ANY law that helps their cause, and I can't ever remember hearing about anti groups going to battle against each other. Nor especially can I ever remember any anti groups going on the attack against their largest most effective most well-known national organization.

Sometimes, I just wish gun owners were as smart as the anti's.
 
I stopped supporting WGO a long time ago. They're all hot air and no substance. Frankly, we've got way too many "pro-gun" groups in WI - and they're all on different pages and singing different tunes. It is telling that WGO, after all their doom-and-gloom words, never got around to putting a link to the actual bill so that folks could read it for themselves.
 
Apparently WGO doesn't care about reciprocity with other states either.

No way Minnesota would consider Alaska/Vermont style law (no permit) valid for carry by a cheesehead here, nor I imagine, would any other shall-issue state. I may be wrong in some cases (haven't done my homework), but most states offer reciprocity to other states that have similar training requirements.

Regardless of your politics, extremists seldom get exactly what they want, and often hurt the cause they are so passionate about.
 
Monkeyleg,

GEE this sounds familiar!

I am an Ohio resident, saddled with the nation's most stupid CCW law, but hey, we have one.

This is reminiscent of what happened here with an organization called PRO (People's Rights Organzation) and OFCC (Ohioans for Concealed Carry). PRO wanted Vermont style, OFCC felt that pigs would fly first, and I believe they were correct, given the RINO governor we have, and a legislature composed partly of key people who needed political appointments from our #$@#@ governor. That being the case there were not enough votes to override.

Vermont style got nowhere in the legislature - but PRO would support nothing less! (Why hang together when we can all hang seperately?) Then the organized open carry walks (why the heck don't they do that in WI???) came along, and a bill, HB12 was introduced. The walks didn't go on long enough as far as I'm concerned, but then I'm a hard-a$$.

OFCC felt that the bill was the best they could do, and said so. The legislative session was about out for the year, so we would have had to wait until the next year to try again. I posted a long message to OFCC's "talk list" saying that the bill as passed was an accident waiting to happen for the unsuspecting, and stupid to boot. Well...

The president of OFCC responded that in 1 year we could have two scenerios: 1) we'd be hoping for a better bill (hey, let the walks continue!), or 2) we could have the most prehistoric bill ever imagined, but it would be shall-issue, it would be legal, and 50,000-100,000 licensees would know it - what better group to lobby ignorant legislators?

Well, I had to agree with his logic, because the composition of the legislature and the next governor were unknowns at the time.

Unless you guys have something to put heat on, like open carry walks to make things better/marginally better, RKBA groups working at cross purposes is going to $crew you too.

So, for you in WI, or for the people of WGO, I would pass this info on.


BB62
 
I wish we could do a few open carry walks here in WI. We need to do something to rattle a few cages. I think most of the libs in Madison would wet themselves if several hundred guys showed up carrying guns down the street. The tricky thing if we ever do some open carry walks would be avoiding all the school buildings.


This new gun groups sounds like an anti group. I have never read so many lies in one email, and I am on the Brady email list.
 
BB62, yep, one in the same. My first reply is 2 above your first one. I'll try to write more later tonight as I'm at work right now.
 
There has been some discussion among WCCA volunteers about open carry marches. (mpthole, didn't you get the email?).

However...one of our volunteers is a Dane County prosecutor who wishes, for obvious reasons, to remain anonymous.

I asked his opinion on an open carry march in Madison, and he strongly advised against it. He said that DA Brian Blanchard cannot be trusted and that, even if Blanchard said a march would be fine, he would likely have everyone arrested.

We may do open carry marches on more friendly turf. The question is when.

BB62, I was talking with our NRA/ILA lobbyist today, mentioned the WGO, and he said that he's seen such groups in just about every state where shall-issue was being legislated.

What really steamed me about WGO was when, on February 3rd of 2004, we were having the Assembly veto override vote. WGO members were distributing literature to supporters of the concealed carry bill, urging them to oppose it.

We need unity amongst gun owners now, and the WGO is fracturing whatever unity we have.
 
Doesn't WI technically have "Vermont style" carry?

Sounds like a group used by the anti's to make the CCW movement look extreme.

If they are legit, the can be used in certian political situations. However, this does not look to be the case here.

In Minnesota right after the 2003 law was passed a new "pro CCW" group came around. They were very vague on their ideas and when pressed, one of the leaders quite coming around one of the internet forums. They've seemed to die off thankfully. So hopefully the same will happen here.
 
Let's talk football.

What would you say about an offense that did the following?

1st Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

2nd Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

3rd Down. Drop back into the pocket, get sacked by the pass rush.

4th Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Pass batted down.

Turn the ball over on downs, watch the other team work their way down the field and score a touchdown.

1st Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

2nd Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

3rd Down. Drop back into the pocket, get sacked by the pass rush.

4th Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

Turn the ball over on downs, watch the other team work their way down the field and score a field goal.

Repeat.

That's what we're doing here. I'm not saying you NEVER throw for the end zone, but you have to work your way down the field. This is what the antis have done to us for YEARS.

When is the last time you heard Diane Fienstein say "Well, I couldn't get them all, so I decided to vote against this ban"???

In the meantime, Alaska has steadly played a game of inches and wound up with Vermont-style carry.

There is a message here.

Mike
 
What would you say about an offense that did the following?

1st Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

2nd Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

3rd Down. Drop back into the pocket, get sacked by the pass rush.

4th Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Pass batted down.

Turn the ball over on downs, watch the other team work their way down the field and score a touchdown.

1st Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

2nd Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

3rd Down. Drop back into the pocket, get sacked by the pass rush.

4th Down. Drop back into the pocket, throw deep. Incomplete.

Turn the ball over on downs, watch the other team work their way down the field and score a field goal.


I'd say get rid of Bret Favre... :neener:
 
Sounds like the WGO is determined to let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

I don't think they are Brady shills, but they are, to the gun grabbers, useful idiots.

I like the continued pitch to join WGO and the lack of link to the bill. I think their agenda is clear.
 
The draft bill will give cops who pull you over an instant alert that
you are a permit holder and may be armed. The Appleton, Wisconsin police chief
has already said that he will inform his officers to "draw their weapons" on
all permit holders detained during routine traffic stops.

Though I disagree with WGO, this does bring up the question: Will the CCW bill contain provisions against law enforcement officers doing this sort of thing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top