Win model '97 strength

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbob38

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
424
Location
Utah's Dixie
I recently checked the mfg date on my 97 and found it was built in 1912. Is this gun strong enough for modern shot shells?
 
Some were chambered for 2 1/2" or 2 9/16" shells, especially the early ones. That has never stopped people from shooting standard 2 3/4" shells through them, but it might be something that needs to be checked. I believe the one I have is a 1931 model and it is 2 3/4", it also has the slightest of a ring or bulge about an inch in front of the barrel attachment point just in front of the forearm. It is so slight that I almost missed it when I looked the gun over initially. Since then I have shot over 4000 rounds through the gun and no additional problems.
 
Should be easy to research. I know they were used by doughboys in WW2 with buckshot to liquify enemy troops in trenches, those were old brass shells. In fact, they were used by the US military until after VN in some cases.
 
I have takedown model with two barrels built in 1917. It has a 2.75" chamber. The last time I shot it was sometime in the 60's. Ammo pressures were about the same back then as they are now. The 97 was designed to use smokeless powder. The only difference is steel shot which should be avoided. I would shoot mine today if I needed to but the old girl is retired.
 
I'm familiar with a very specific failure of a 97 Winchester that happened at a SASS/Cowboy Action Event. The shooter had been reloading his own shot shells using plastic shot cups and black powder. The burn characteristics of black vs. smokeless resulted in melting the shot cups and fusing the residue in the barrel. Eventually the residue raised the pressure enough to split the barrel.

I have a 97 that I used for SASS matches. It consumed lots of cheap WalMart loads with no problems.
 
Thanks all. I was wondering if there was any material or heat treating upgrade during the mfg. run. For example S&W began heat treating revolvers about 1919, as I recall.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top