DNS wrote:
Just because somebody tells you to do something doesn't absolve you from all responsibility for yourself. If there are those who call 911 and then do nothing, they would have done nothing without 911 as well. Let's face it. There are some folks who will never be self reliant. There will be folks we can't ever save.
I don't think anyone here is suggesting that people should not be self-reliant. I DO think people here disagree with the idea that all problem can be-- and should be-- handled by a 911 call.
The reactions you are seeing here are from those exasperated persons who are tired of the "Call 911 in the event of an emergency" with the assumption that it will fix everything statements we routinely get.
Clearly, that is NOT the case, and yet it is repeated as if it were the word of god by many.
Speaking of which, how many people here who are comlaining about 911 and the lack of response are willing to pay the extra money for a better system and to have cops on every corner, 24/7?
I've spent quite a bit on upgrades. None of them rely on waiting for a cop to get here from 22 miles away. Instead, I focus on what is actually effective for me. Even the most uninformed among the rural communities understand that 911 can't save us.
But I fail to see how ANY money spent on upgrades would prevent an operator from hanging up and forgetting about you.
I don't care who tells you that you should rely on 911, but everyone should try thinking for themselves for a change.
You seem to operate from the assumption that we don't.
We call folks "sheeple" because they default to what the police tell them to do just like so many of us will default to whatever some gunwriter or gun instructor tells us to do. We are just as guilty of the same sin of blindly following a supposed leader as those we call "sheeple." We just think we are smarter because we blindly follow with guns.
While your point is valid for many people in the gun community, it fails to be even remotely relevent.
We could say the exact same about cars, entertainment systems, and that guy who talked me into planting Sawtooth Oak Trees in my yard.
Until you are an expert on something, you typically defer to the opinions of "the experts." Later, you learn that they are not necessarily experts themselves-- or have an agenda-- or are speaking about things that are not relevent to you.
By the time you figure that out, you don't NEED thier opinions.
In the case of the experts putting down any suggestion other than calling 911, you do not get the benefit of figuring out the fallacy of it later.
If you don't like 911, then don't use it. That will free up the limited system resources for others.
It is not a question of not liking it. It is a question of understanding that it is not rubbing on a lamp to get 3 wishes from a blue guy in a turbin. It is a question of QUESTIONING the conventional wisdom offered routinely.
And in the case of a 911 operator that hangs up and does not send any response to a plea for help, it is inexcusable, irresponsible, incompetation, unconcerned, and damned evil. Don't try to defend that with "if you don't like it, don't use it."
Until you tell me that I don't have to pay for it with my taxes, I'll use it as damned often as I need to.
You can call the non-emergency number to report a crime after you have vanquished the bad guy.
Considering that we can't get a response here in under 30 minutes, that was my original plan. It's either that or be found in a pool of my own blood. The former sounds more workable for me.
-- John