Would like advice choosing a pocket pistol.

Status
Not open for further replies.
.380? Sig 238
9mm? Walther PPS with the flush mounting mag

Amen to this. I have both of these and they're wonderful. The Sig shoots like a dream. I could go to the range, shoot nothing but that little Sig all day and be happy. The PPS is a little snappier, but still a great shooter. It's also crazy comfortable to carry, and is thin enough that you can stow it in a pocket without people asking if "you're happy to see them."

If you look VERY carefully and aren't picky about style, the Sig can be had in your budget. I got mine for something like $515 OTD at a show. He had that model and another for less, but it was used.

The PPS? Your best bet on that would be to find a disgruntled owner. I'll never sell mine, but it seems like there's always someone around here with a PPS who has some beef with it.
 
This thread beautifully indicates that the size which defines "pocket pistol" is literally a "moving target" as it is defined by each individual defining it. Clearly, the PSA Baby Browning, Seecamp 32/380, and Kel-Tecs are pocket pistols. Whether the Various 9mm pistols (other than the Rohrbaugh) and others, including some other .380s are pocket pistols depends a lot on the individual and his/her pockets and on the degree of concealment desired (or necessary).
 
I have a CM9 that fits the bill.....

But...... You may want to try a small 38 revolver

They draw MUCH faster IMHO
 
I don't post here very often at all, but wanted to chime in. I have an affinity for pocket pistols and I have to echo jahwarrior's recommendation of a baby browning or PSA variant.

I have an original FN and 2 recent production Stainless PSA's. They are extremely well made, very reliable from my experiences, and insanely pocketable. They are oddly accurate for such a little pistol and have much less recoil than say a ruger lcp. I know as I have an lcp as well.

But if you don't want to consider anything less than a .380, I would suggest a Sig P238. It's small enough to fit in the pocket, and is a MUCH softer shooter than the lcp. It's my favorite .380 at the moment.
Rob, those PSA's are absolutely gorgeous. I was looking to buy a Raven, when I bought my PSP. I had a Raven when I was a kid, and wanted one for nostalgic reasons. But my dealer had a PSP right next to the Raven I was going to buy (not to mention being overpriced at $100+), and at first I thought the PSP was a Browning. I had no idea they were being made here under a different name, and after doing some research, here and elsewhere, I thought it was well worth the $200 I spent.
 
well, i wanted total conceal ability in ANY clothing, so i went with the 380's. i have a kel-tec P3AT, and a Ruger LCP. they are both very close to the same dimensions. BUT, they both have their good and bad points. with my LCP, i have NEVER (after the initial run in of 200 rounds) had a mis fire, jam, or any other functioning problem. with the kel-tec, i have had a few problems. at first, there was a problem with jamming. even after the initial run in of 200 rounds. i consider the 200 round run in MANDATORY for a gun that you are going to bet your life on. moving parts need to "mate" in order to work properly, and i do not know of a better way than to shoot it. anyway. kel-tec paid to have the gun returned to them, and shipped it back rather quickly i might add, with an entire new slide assembly. they were not going to take a chance on fixing one little thing. a couple of years later, the firing pin broke. which they sent me a replacement, no questions asked. of course, my LCP had to go back to the factory as well. it was an early model, and there was a recall on them. as far as shooting them. the kel-tec wins out on controlability, hands down. the checkering on the grip is sharp, and even with sweaty hands, i can still get a good grip on the gun with no problem. the Ruger, has an inverted checkering that gives the sweat some place to go, but there are no "points" to come out and let your skin bite into. both guns are designed to shoot very short ranges. so sights are both really weak. i have developed a much faster way of aiming, that at 20 feet (or less), is plenty good enough to stop a person (if the cartridge will). i simply look down the slide, and make sure that the top is flat and that i can not see one side or the other of the slide. this is close enough for center of mass shots. and with the long double action only of these, it is probably about as good as your going to get anyway. speaking of which, the kel-tec's trigger is a good 2-3 pounds lighter, and easier to pull than the rugers is. combine that with the superior grips, and it is easy to see why the kel-tec is the better shooter. both of these guns now have well over a thousand rounds thru them. and i do not worry about reliability anymore. i am always carrying one or the other, but in cooler weather, it is a back up gun, as i prefer to carry the ol 45. but it is going to be HARD to conceal a full size 45 in cut offs and a t shirt. and just so you know, these are actually small enough that if you need to, you can carry them under a baseball cap on your head. certainly not the preferred place, but in a pinch....
 
If you're looking for low recoil, you're looking at the wrong guns, especially in .380ACP and 9mm. I've owned both the Keltec P3AT and the PF9, and they had some of the worst felt recoil of any gun I've ever shot. Also, their trigger pulls are about 20 miles long. The Diamonback is close to feeling like a Glock, as far as the trigger is concerned, but the recoil is still a bit much.

My pocket gun of choice is a Baby Browning clone, made by PSP/PSA, and is chambered for the .25ACP round. It's all-steel construction, but is lightweight, accurate, reliable, and easy to take down for maintenance. It's probably the smallest gun I've ever had. I can conceal it in my hand, and it fits in just about any pocket I can find.

http://unblinkingeye.com/Guns/PSP-25/psp-25.html

http://www.precisionsmallarms.com/
My pf9 was not bad at all but I work on my grip strenght.

the p3at is a kitten
 
x_wrench, I find your experience with the LCP and P3AT to be interesting. As I looked at them, I originally chose the P3AT over the LCP for two reasons: A - it felt like it would be more secure in my hand for the checkering reasons you mentioned, and B - I figured George Kellgren deserved profit from what is essentially his idea. After shooting the P3AT and a friend's LCP side-by-side, however, my thinking changed 180 degrees. Oddly enough, for me, the LCP was more controllable, more accurate, and softer shooting than the P3AT. I do agree, however, that I liked the P3AT trigger better than the LCP trigger, but I can't argue with results. I ended up trading my P3AT toward a Bersa CC model and then bought an LCP and I'm very happy. I do have a Kel-Tec P32 that I like very much and will not be rid of. I like mouseguns and might even try another P3AT someday but am quite content with the LCP.
 
Last edited:
Haven't read the entire thread but something you may want to look at is a Kel Tec .32 ACP. Its the gun I carry when "I can't carry a gun." Fill it with Fiocchi hard ball for best results. It has virtually no recoil and you just about forget you have it with you no matter how you tote it. Mind has been reliable but its main drawback is its a .32;)
 
One of the NRA mags had a pretty comprehensive comparison of the 380 mouse guns about a year ago. They were pretty blunt in their experiences and opinions. Anyone have a link to that article? Was the the mag American Rifleman?
 
If you want a real POCKET gun, I'd look at the Seecamp LWS32. The other guns mentioned in this thread are excellent, but unless you constantly wear pants with huge cargo pockets and strong belts, they really aren't "pocket" guns.
I don't understand - the Ruger LCP weighs 9.4 oz unloaded VS the Seecamp at 11.5 oz. unloaded
The LCP is .35 inches taller than the Seecamp - The Seecamp is .04 inches wider than the LCP
And the LCP is less than 1 inch longer than the Seecamp.

In some dimensions, the Ruger is a larger gun - but only slightly so, and it carries .380 ammo VS .32

And it's considerably lighter than the Seecamp.

I really don't think one needs huge cargo pants to carry the Ruger as opposed to the Seecamp - in fact, I'd rather carry the Ruger as it's so much lighter.
 
I had the pockets of my cargo shorts extended so I could carry a Ruger police service six 357 with 4 inch barrel,but realistically for me about 16 ounces is the limit for comfort!
 
I had the pockets of my cargo shorts extended so I could carry a Ruger police service six 357 with 4 inch barrel,but realistically for me about 16 ounces is the limit for comfort!
My S&W BG380 weighs in at 14 oz with 6 in the mag and one in the pipe. In a pocket holster, it's smaller than my wallet. When I carry it sits in my right front pocket.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top