I realize that you said, autoloaders only, but surely you realized that talking aout bolt actions is almost irresistable.
True, a bolt action, under the right circumstances would not be any kind of a liability. But, like all hypothetical questions, you have to decide the circumstances. In his question, telewinz used the phrase, "you were issued". This to me implies that I would be a member of a conventional army on "the modern battlefield". So, he didn't say anything about me being in charge, and he didn't mention that I was a member of some small special ops unit, so I have to assume that I am going to be conducting a conventional infantry type war. The bolt action rifle would not be a good choice for this in the 21st century.
Now, if you make up a senario where you get to make all the decisions, and you get to totally dictate how and when you engage the enemy, then a bolt gun isn't a bad choice; especially since if you can do all that, you could also avoid combat all together.
True, a bolt action, under the right circumstances would not be any kind of a liability. But, like all hypothetical questions, you have to decide the circumstances. In his question, telewinz used the phrase, "you were issued". This to me implies that I would be a member of a conventional army on "the modern battlefield". So, he didn't say anything about me being in charge, and he didn't mention that I was a member of some small special ops unit, so I have to assume that I am going to be conducting a conventional infantry type war. The bolt action rifle would not be a good choice for this in the 21st century.
Now, if you make up a senario where you get to make all the decisions, and you get to totally dictate how and when you engage the enemy, then a bolt gun isn't a bad choice; especially since if you can do all that, you could also avoid combat all together.