trickyasafox
Member
congrats to your sis! nice animal
Remember, most military rounds are not designed to kill. They are designed to inflict wounds to disable a military's foe.
Quote:
Lots of things may be legal, but not necessarily the best choice. Congratulations on the deer! Glad to hear you use another military caliber for your bambi hunting.
Theory on battle rifles is that if you wound a man, it disables at least one other opponent in taking care of the wounded person. You don't need to kill them to win.
Why does this myth continue to get perpetuated?
I took the bolt from his rifle for a year as a lesson in using the right ammo for the job.
and at reasonable range is better than a slug or arrow.
Less than .240 cal isn't legal in many states for big game. If it's legal in your state, the please keep in mind that there are maximum ranges in which to expect optimal performance any caliber. Assault rifle or not.
I have a friend that took a Cow Elk with a .762x39.. Not recommended. But it was at close range.
Remember, most military rounds are not designed to kill. They are designed to inflict wounds to disable a military's foe.
-Steve
It may not be current military policy, but it is certainly not a myth. During the Civil War many commanders ordered troops to shoot to wound, knowing that a wound from a .58 caliber would result in amputations and do more harm to the enemy than killing them. Dead soldiers were abandoned or buried on the battle field and their clothes, shoes, and rifles were recycled. Wounded soldiers required a lot of attention before they died, creating a tremendous drain of resources. When Lee left Gettysburg with a slow moving wagon train of wounded many miles long, it allowed Meade to catch him before he could cross the Potamac. Only Meade's inaction and a heavy thunderstorm at that point allowed Lee to escape back across the river. It may no longer be correct for today's military, but is well documented in history.Why does this myth continue to get perpetuated?