Your Experience with Ruger Double Action Revolvers
- Thread starter Savage92
- Start date
- Status
RNB65
Member
I love my GP100. It had a loose rear sight pin when I bought it, but it was an easy fix. I replaced the skinny stock grips with Hogue rubber grips and it shoots great.
GP100man
Member
the triggers arnt as good as some others but can be smoothed out to be very servicable,but the durability & longevity is unmatched by any production revolver period.
and thats why everything has turned to rugers in my safe!!!
GP100man
and thats why everything has turned to rugers in my safe!!!
GP100man
BozemanMT
Member
They don't break.
They are complete clubs in regards to ergonomics and trigger pull, but they don't break.
They are complete clubs in regards to ergonomics and trigger pull, but they don't break.
VA27
Member
SP101 and just got a 4" Redhawk in 45 Colt. I shot the Redhawk so much this weekend my hand is sore. I've even got a load that launches a 420gr cast bullet about 950fps or so. Big Hog Medicine!
wheelgunfan
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 23
Security six 357 a tank
Yukonstorm
Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
- Messages
- 51
Many years ago I shot PPC with a Security Six, had a good action job, millet sights, constantly won my class. It was laughed at originally by all the SW guys, later on it became well respected. Equipment is important, but training is what will win.
gunman42782
Member
I own a GP100 and SP101, and have owned Redhawks, Super Redhawks, Security Six's. They are rock solid, dependable guns, that will outlive you and your grandkids.
Bula
Member
My Blackhawks, GP100 and Redhawks have ALL been tanks. They're not as sexy as some Smiths or Colts, but they can definitely take a lickin' and keep on keepin' on.
evan price
Member
I don't know how you could hurt a Super Rehawk short of a double max charge...
Fumbler
Member
I have a GP-100 and a Super Redhawk in 480 Ruger.
Original fit/finish is pretty darn good and I've never had a problem with either.
They always go bang.
The triggers aren't S&W triggers, but with some new springs, a tiny bit of polishing, and a lot of shooting and they'll get pretty darn slick.
They're still longer than a S&W DA, but you can't smooth out the inherent geometry.
I love Ruger revolvers.
Original fit/finish is pretty darn good and I've never had a problem with either.
They always go bang.
The triggers aren't S&W triggers, but with some new springs, a tiny bit of polishing, and a lot of shooting and they'll get pretty darn slick.
They're still longer than a S&W DA, but you can't smooth out the inherent geometry.
I love Ruger revolvers.
Six O'clock Tactical
Member
never seen a ruger that didnt work like it was new. How it works when its new is debatable... but it will never die.
Pat Cannon
Member
I was an all-1911 guy until I saw an SP101 and traded my Kimber for it. Liked it so much I sold my cheap Filipino 1911 clone and bought a used GP100 online. Now I'm an all-Ruger-stainless-DAO-revolver guy.
fastbolt
Member
I'd have to say that overall my personal experience with Ruger DA revolvers has been pretty good.
I've owned several Security/Service/Speed-Six models, a Ruger Redhawk and a SP-101 DAO.
The Redhawk needed a new hammer & trigger (out-of-spec) and the SP-101 had a badly burred part which caused the cylinder to repeatedly seize once the gun became heated up, but which was easily repaired. I had a 6" Security-Six develop a timing & end shake problem, but I purchased it used from another cop, so who knows how it had been used and treated?
That's fairly similar to the number of problems I've experienced with S&W revolvers.
I've had a couple of problems with Ruger SA revolvers, and I had to have the slide replaced on an early production P-90 (the factory said it had developed a defect caused by a tempering problem which had been missed during production).
Overall, I think Ruger makes good quality firearms which are reliable, durable and provide good value for the investment.
I've owned several Security/Service/Speed-Six models, a Ruger Redhawk and a SP-101 DAO.
The Redhawk needed a new hammer & trigger (out-of-spec) and the SP-101 had a badly burred part which caused the cylinder to repeatedly seize once the gun became heated up, but which was easily repaired. I had a 6" Security-Six develop a timing & end shake problem, but I purchased it used from another cop, so who knows how it had been used and treated?
That's fairly similar to the number of problems I've experienced with S&W revolvers.
I've had a couple of problems with Ruger SA revolvers, and I had to have the slide replaced on an early production P-90 (the factory said it had developed a defect caused by a tempering problem which had been missed during production).
Overall, I think Ruger makes good quality firearms which are reliable, durable and provide good value for the investment.
My 4" GP100 has proved to be a very good revolver. While it handles full power mag loads very well, I really enjoy shooting inexpensive LWC in it. It is easy and relaxing to spend all afternoon expending 200-300 rounds, cutting nice offhand groups at varying distances.
I don't own any of Rugers DA revolvers, but I have shot several of the Service/Speed/Security Sixes, 3 GP-100's and a couple of SP-101's.
They all went BANG! every time, and put the lead where pointed. My favorite of them was the 6" GP-100. Least favortite was the 2-1/4" (or so) SP-101, simply because I am not really good with the short-barrel shootin' irons.
Gotta say though, that the SP-101 is a lot more pleasant to shoot even with 'STOUT!' loads that I would have imagined. The weight and grip design soaks up a bunch of the 'smack' to the hands of those barn-burners.
They all went BANG! every time, and put the lead where pointed. My favorite of them was the 6" GP-100. Least favortite was the 2-1/4" (or so) SP-101, simply because I am not really good with the short-barrel shootin' irons.
Gotta say though, that the SP-101 is a lot more pleasant to shoot even with 'STOUT!' loads that I would have imagined. The weight and grip design soaks up a bunch of the 'smack' to the hands of those barn-burners.
I've got a Super Redhawk and Redhawk. The SRH is actually smoother than the King Cobra I've got. The Redhawk needed a trigger job, but total investment in it was only $750.00 and it's now the smoothest trigger I've pulled. Both are very accurate.
MCgunner
Member
My old Security Six was a strong, accurate revolver. It was a little less than accurate with .38 special, but was a tack driver with .357 loads. It kicked like HELL, though. Lots of muzzle flip. I really don't miss that part of it.
My SP101 is SWEET! It's very accurate and, weirdly, a lot easier to shoot with hot loads than the Security Six was! Not near as hard on the hand and no more muzzle flip. The SP101 is a gem. I would highly recommend it to someone wanting a powerful, easy to belt carry, accurate .357 magnum personal defense weapon. It is among the best choices out there for such a weapon IMHO and is the lightest .357 I can shoot well with full power ammunition. If you're going to carry a .357 revolver, there's no sense in shooting "light magnum" loads or .38 +P in it. Get a .38, cheaper. If I'm going to carry a .357, it's going to be with eyebrow burning, hog stomping, full power blow 'em in half 600 ft lb or better ammunition. I ain't messin' with those wussie loads for girls.
The SP101 fires my 180 grain handload to 1306 fps. That's 662 ft lbs!
That's enough for outdoor carry in bear country and it's quite accurate with that load, too. My defense load involves a little tamer 140 grain Speer at 1335 or so fps. It makes about 550 ft lbs from the gun's 2.25" barrel. I don't think you'd wanna fire this stuff in a Scandium revolver. I know I wouldn't.
Never owned a GP100 or Redhawk, but if I wanted such a handgun, I wouldn't hesitate to get one from Ruger. Strength and reliability and accuracy are the trademarks.
My SP101 is SWEET! It's very accurate and, weirdly, a lot easier to shoot with hot loads than the Security Six was! Not near as hard on the hand and no more muzzle flip. The SP101 is a gem. I would highly recommend it to someone wanting a powerful, easy to belt carry, accurate .357 magnum personal defense weapon. It is among the best choices out there for such a weapon IMHO and is the lightest .357 I can shoot well with full power ammunition. If you're going to carry a .357 revolver, there's no sense in shooting "light magnum" loads or .38 +P in it. Get a .38, cheaper. If I'm going to carry a .357, it's going to be with eyebrow burning, hog stomping, full power blow 'em in half 600 ft lb or better ammunition. I ain't messin' with those wussie loads for girls.
The SP101 fires my 180 grain handload to 1306 fps. That's 662 ft lbs! That's enough for outdoor carry in bear country and it's quite accurate with that load, too. My defense load involves a little tamer 140 grain Speer at 1335 or so fps. It makes about 550 ft lbs from the gun's 2.25" barrel. I don't think you'd wanna fire this stuff in a Scandium revolver. I know I wouldn't.Never owned a GP100 or Redhawk, but if I wanted such a handgun, I wouldn't hesitate to get one from Ruger. Strength and reliability and accuracy are the trademarks.
bannockburn
Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 26,308
I posted elsewhere that I truly miss every Security Six and Service Six that I owned, and then sold or traded away. Incredibly sturdy, well built revolvers that were way ahead of their time in design and manufacture. I wouldn't mind seeing Ruger doing a limited run re-issue of the Security Six; I know I would definitely be interested in something like that.
Snubster
Member
My 2 SP-101s have replaced all of my S&W J-frames for carry duty. I like the extra weight and get the sense they are very durable since I dryfire a lot.
I'll be honest, I don't think they're as pretty as my S&Ws (most of my collection is still S&W). But I find them to be very durable and shootable with magnum loads.
I'll be honest, I don't think they're as pretty as my S&Ws (most of my collection is still S&W). But I find them to be very durable and shootable with magnum loads.
Mixed bag.
I shot a Super Redhawk in .480 and liked it, a Redhawk in .44 and absolutely loved it. I'm not sure what I was thinking, but I didn't even realize I was shooting a Ruger when I first shot the Redhawk. I'd get a Redhawk or Super Redhawk.
I'm not at all impressed with the ergonomics of the GP-100. It may be stout, but it's a clunky design that feels lousy in my hand, has harsh edges on the frame and hammer, and a spur that's hard to reach. I suppose my expectations from a .357 are a bit different from a the real big bore guns. I'll pony up for a 686, thanks.
Cocking the Single Six is just plain nasty-feeling. I like my old H&R .22LR/WMR a lot better; it's drop-safe also, and back in the day, it was cheaper than the Ruger. But all Ruger's single actions do last, even when abused.
All I can say is, try before you buy. If you like them, they'll serve you well.
I shot a Super Redhawk in .480 and liked it, a Redhawk in .44 and absolutely loved it. I'm not sure what I was thinking, but I didn't even realize I was shooting a Ruger when I first shot the Redhawk. I'd get a Redhawk or Super Redhawk.
I'm not at all impressed with the ergonomics of the GP-100. It may be stout, but it's a clunky design that feels lousy in my hand, has harsh edges on the frame and hammer, and a spur that's hard to reach. I suppose my expectations from a .357 are a bit different from a the real big bore guns. I'll pony up for a 686, thanks.
Cocking the Single Six is just plain nasty-feeling. I like my old H&R .22LR/WMR a lot better; it's drop-safe also, and back in the day, it was cheaper than the Ruger. But all Ruger's single actions do last, even when abused.
All I can say is, try before you buy. If you like them, they'll serve you well.
Legionnaire
Contributing Member
I like ruger DA revolvers. My first was a scoped 9.5" SRH .44 mag that I sold when I moved away from a "shotgun only" area of New York State. It was a great shooter and I took several whitetail with it.
Next addition was a 4" GP100. It's a tank that I don't plan parting with any time soon. I added a 2.25" SP101 a while ago, and it quickly became one of my favorite carry guns. I recently found a 4" SP101 in .22LR. Compared to the others, it is less smooth and will require some work and extensive shooting to smooth up the action. But I love its heft in the hand.
Also have a 5.5" Redhawk .44 I just set up with a scope, and another 4" .44 Redhawk I'm waiting to take delivery on.
Should note that every Ruger revolver I've purchased I bought second hand. Every one has been in great shape, and every one a shooter. I'd say I've had very good experience with Ruger DA revolvers.
Next addition was a 4" GP100. It's a tank that I don't plan parting with any time soon. I added a 2.25" SP101 a while ago, and it quickly became one of my favorite carry guns. I recently found a 4" SP101 in .22LR. Compared to the others, it is less smooth and will require some work and extensive shooting to smooth up the action. But I love its heft in the hand.
Also have a 5.5" Redhawk .44 I just set up with a scope, and another 4" .44 Redhawk I'm waiting to take delivery on.
Should note that every Ruger revolver I've purchased I bought second hand. Every one has been in great shape, and every one a shooter. I'd say I've had very good experience with Ruger DA revolvers.
- Status
