Your Handgun Choice

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Walther P99 in 9mm with the AS trigger configuration. It's tough for me to top the accuracy I consistently get with this pistol.
 
One *I* own? Danged limiting, but not too bad -- I'd go w/ the CZ-75. Feels right in the hand, accurate, reliable, enough in the mag for followups.

But if I could put it on someone else's expense account, I think I'd like it to be a Five-SeveN :) (Having never fired one, it's true, but based on handling one, the capacity, flat-shooting ammo, reports from happy owners, etc.)

timothy
 
Yeah a .22 is easier to shoot but if the range gets out to more than 50' feet or so lots of luck hitting anything.

What is this supposed to mean? If it's easier to shoot you should be able to hit at any range better than with a bigger gun?

Anyway, to pick one handgun from what I own for varied shooting disciplines, probabbly my 4" S&W Model 19, .357 Magnum. It will work for PPC, action shooting (slow to reload and limited capacity, but there are revolver divisions! ;) ), Bullseye, IDPA, steel plates, bowling pins, etc. I can hit with it to at least 50 yards with ease, double action, and if I switch to SA I can make hits to 100 yards about 50% of the time.
 
As long as I can tweak it I would use a TT-33 Tokarev in 7.62x25. The round has an effect range out to 100 meters with a pretty flat trajectory all the way out according to everything that I've read.

Everyone that I talk with concerning the gun/round states that the recoil isn't much, somewhere along the lines between a 9mm and 40 S&W as long as you're not using submachinegun ammo. :what: The mag carries 8rds but most competitions that I've ever been in require a reload after 6 to be fair to the revolver guys. So a high capacity to my way of thinking isn't a issue.

The gun has been proven on countless battlefields as rugged, simplistic, dependable, effected and has the same basic ergonomics as the 1911. :cool:

The tweaks that I would make if possible would be of course a action job, refitting of the barrel (after adding a screw on compensator) to the slide as well as refit of the slide to frame. I would flare the mag well as well as flaring and lowering of the ejection port. Add to that stippling of the front/back straps as well as the rear of slide, plus the addition of XS 24/7 express sights (small dot) and I would be good to go. :rolleyes:

Except for IDPA (I don't believe they still allow compensators, thus a need for a backup barrel and bushing) or those who feel that they need to put limits on calibers :)fire:) I would find it hard to beat! :D
 
Last edited:
I think it boils down to what you're best with,in all-around shooting.Laugh,if you must,but I would use my rt37.380.I can hit the target at up to 100yds,and I'm comfortable enough to be able to do quick re-loads.Besides,since I sold my Redhawk.44rem,it's the only bloody handgun I've got---for now!
 
dont own one but a glock 17L would do well feel free to add laser and red dot sight and 33rd mags
 
Glock 22. Even though I don't think it is the perfect gun (some flaws in the design for .40), I shoot mine lights out. It makes shooting seem easy.
 
I like the IDPA philosophy of "compete with what you normally carry to defend yourself with".

For me that's one of several 3rd gen S&Ws in 9mm or .40.
 
For a show deal it would be a 6" 586 that I shoot in matches. Plenty of range and superbly accurate. It has been cut for full moon clips so the speed reloading is not an issue either.

Greg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top