Your opinion of WWI era 1911s?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LAR-15

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
3,385
What is your opinions of 1911s made for the US forces for World War I?

Thanks
 
I wasn't around during WW1 but the ones I have handled, sold, worked on, and shot since the big war have all impressed me as the best weapon of that era,,,,,,,
 
If you find one functioning fine today, then you know it's a great gun because only the best last this long.
 
The early 1911s are beautifully made; if you find a blued version the finish is to die for. My friend owned a 1911 and I drooled every time I held it. Regards, Richard:D
 
Well,

Let's look at the guns of that era that were in use at the time:

USA: 1911, Colt 1917, S&W 1917. 2 of these are still in production. The 1911 is under manufacture by at least 10 companies off the top of my head, and S&W brought back the 1917 as a performance shop model.

Britain: Webley MK VI in .455, great revolver, production stopped in 1918, hasn't been seen since WWII.

Russia: 1895 Nagant Revolver. Still in use by some railway and rural police forces in Russia.

Germany: 1908 Luger. Still made, but serious use stopped after WWII.

Italy: Some 10.5 MM Revolver, or something like that.

Austria-Hungary. The Rast...

Of all the WWI pistols, the 1911 is still the only one in production and has been considered the best design of all time.

Yeah, I want one, want one bad...
 
My opinion of em is that there's a check on my desk waiting to accept a rather impressive number should one rear it's head.
 
I had a Colt made in 1917 that had been reblued, so I was able to get it cheap. I had it for a few years, and ended up selling it because I had an opportunity to make a pretty good profit, and because it didn't really fill any niche in my collection that wasn't already covered by another gun.
With hardball, it was absolutely reliable 100% of the time, but accuracy was less than stellar. For self defense purposes it would be fine, but at 50 ft., groups were 8-10". The grip safety was small, so it would sometimes bite, and the sights were very small and hard to see except in very good light.
I would offer the opinion that if you want one as a collector's piece, great. If you want a shooter, there are better 1911's to be had for less money.
 
The best there is. Next comes a couple of custom 1911's, and I mean just a couple.
 
My early one is a 1913 shooter, stock. Trigger pull is 9 pounds, it has the patented invisible knife-blade front sight and shallow rounded notch rear, and shoots 6" high at normal ranges.

As Buffalo Bill (allegedly) said, "It never failed me".

I have a few "better" 1911s, but I would take this one to war without any reservations...
 
Quote "The early 1911s are beautifully made; if you find a blued version the finish is to die for. My friend owned a 1911 and I drooled every time I held it. Regards, Richard"

I understand it's the drool that actually helps these pistols to keep that superb bluing over so many years.

Seriously tho, how do you properly use the quote function? I'm new here and don't know. On my other forums there is a "quote" button.
Thanks,
Mike
 
Quote: "My early one is a 1913 shooter, stock. Trigger pull is 9 pounds, it has the patented invisible knife-blade front sight and shallow rounded notch rear, and shoots 6" high at normal ranges".

The enemy was taller back then
 
I got to shoot a Colt made in 1918 (although I'm sure some parts have been replaced since then) and it shot pretty good for a 'combat' handgun.

I think the 1911 is the best semi auto pistol design ever made to this point
 
The older Colts had sights that were virtually useless. Nostalgia hardly compensates for that. Get an updated 1911 - there a good reasons why people make those instead of the old style guns.
 
BCMike:

Select the text you want to quote (after pasting it in, or tapping it in), then click the "quote balloon" in the row of icons above the text-entry area where you write a reply.

One day I'll illustrate with screenshots, because this is a frequently asked and answered question, but as the saying goes (or at least is paraphrased), "Past the nipple, nothing's intuitive."

timothy
 
When my father-in-law, first sgt of his company in France, was mustered out in 1919, he bought his 1911 for $25. He soon became a federal agent (postal inspector), and carried it as his personal weapon. His daughter still describes how her father could keep a can in the air for an entire magazine load. He later was bodyguard for a supreme court justice, and then went as high up in the Postal Department as a civil servant could at the time -- GS 16. When he retired in 1958, he was Director of Finance. Thereafter, having lived a long and lively life, he died at almost 101. He (and his wife) now reside in Fort Rosecrans National Cemetery up on Point Loma, overlooking San Diego. The pistol then came into our possession. My wife elected to sell it about ten years ago to a local gun store for $200. I tried to talk her out of it, but could not. Sad story, right?
Cordially, Jack
 
While I recognize that the older steel is not as good as today's, if I could afford a nice one, I would buy it. I don't shoot any one gun enough to really wear it out anymore so no harm in shooting one.

The fit/finish/polish/blueing of a really nice commercial grade pre-ww1 colt is amazing. I have seen a few over the years down at collector's here in houston and know what I would do if I won the lottery!
 
Soft steel, so limit the shooting and only those that either have a known history or that have been thoroughly checked out and given a clean bill of health...by somebody who knows what they're lookin' at.

Here's an original/correct 1919 Colt that'll stay inside of 4 inches at 50 yards from the bags with PMC or Winchester Q45 ball. It'll also feed and function with H&G #68 200-grain LSWCs and any good hollowpoint ammo...from the original "Hardball Only" magazines. I replaced all springs, and fitted a small-radius firing pin stop to reduce the slide to frame impact...and kept the original parts, of course. In the background is an original 1945 production Remington Rand that'll handle the same ammo as slick as green grease thru a loose goose.

And,no....neither pistol is rattletrap loose.

Colt.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top