How do you like the new pap rifles would you say they are as good as saiga (finish, function accuracy)
They are different than Saigas. It's hard to say which is better. Both have pros and cons.
Saiga pros:
-Hammer-forged chrome-lined barrels.
-Lighter weight.
-Much wider availability of accessory parts.
-Quality Russian construction on the same production line that makes modern Russian AK-74M and AK-100-series military rifles.
-Accurate. The Saiga definitely bucks the AK stereotype of being inaccurate.
Saiga cons:
-You have to convert them back to AK configuration (a pro if you are like me, though, and want to customize to your desires, and enjoy the conversion process).
-Ugly (but very durable) finish.
-Prices have risen drastically in the last two years (from $300 to north of $500 for an unconverted IZ-132).
O-PAP pros:
-Nice finish for an AK.
-Rigid RPK-style receiver.
-Heavy barrel & receiver soak up recoil.
-Already in proper AK pistol-grip configuration with threaded muzzle attachment.
-Great value at the $600 price point they've been seen at.
O-PAP cons:
-Heavier than converted Saiga.
-No chrome lining to barrel (yes, I know that's how the Yugos have always done it that way, but that doesn't mean I have to like it).
-Not all of them come with the cool double-headed eagle emblem on the stock.
-Much more limited in furniture and aftermarket parts options.
-Potential of having to deal with Century's shoddy CS.
If properly put together, both the Saiga and O-PAP (please note I am referring only to the O-PAP and not the troublesome PAP or N-PAP) will be accurate and reliable. Personally, I prefer Saigas, due to their Russian pedigree, high-quality hammer-forged and chrome-lined barrels, and lighter weight, but the O-PAP is no slouch, and it is certainly a good-looking and well-made rifle.
.