Thanks. If you ever remove it, please show us a photo.
I looked it up on Youtube. Looks like you just have to remove the pin in back. (1 minute in)
Thanks. If you ever remove it, please show us a photo.
Thank you, I get it now. On this type of gun Sig calls the housing for the fire control group "the frame" and serializes it. I guess since it is removable from the ploymer. The frame on most handguns is what they call the grip. Same "Modular" setup as the P320 I guess.
View attachment 789621 View attachment 789622
Just handled a P365 about a half hour ago. It's very wee. The bottom rear edge of the grip really felt like it would dig into my palm pretty bad.
My hands are really boney. Not sure it'll work for me. I'm going to have to rent one before buying.
Yea, seems to shoot "bigger" than it is.I thought that at first from just holding it, but I don't seem to notice it when I shoot mine.
That's what I did, based on what I read and what I saw at Academy.I may perform a $500 experiment.
Sawdust on the grip is from the chainsaw.
See Page 1.Has anyone run any ammo over a chrono?
Man I want to know where Sig gets their Xerox machines!
View attachment 790148
View attachment 790149
View attachment 790150
View attachment 790151
Seriously though I think this is great. They took a LC9s pro, which is a great pistol albeit cheaply made, tweaked it into a higher quality gun and gave it 3 more rounds. I will definitely be getting one. I was curious how the fire control group worked but I didn't take the slide off at the store as some counter people get upset when you do that.
I have the LC9s, and will say it has held up well with thousands of rounds down range although a snappy gun. Reliability was never a issue." I later moved on to a Mico 9mm that suites me more". I have shot the Sig 365 and do think they are very similar in shooting characteristics.(the Sig a little less snappy) However one of the concerns I had with the Sig is the very narrow grip to receiver space and it did prove somewhat problematic. My thumb on my off hand would almost ride the receiver and had to be very careful in the placement. And it would just not work for me wearing glove. Some of the others that test fired the gun felt the same. The Sig only had 4 failures out of the 1,000 rounds we fired, and we all felt they were user error and not the gun.(riding the slide) We also warned all shooters to be careful of hand placement near the receiver before shooting.
Looking at your Picture of the shows the narrow grip to reciever very well. If shooting thousands of rounds down range with the Ruger with no major problems as far as the pistol holding up then, I am not sure now is the time to tell which gun is actually better made. Yes, the Sig is all Stainless Steel which does indicate a better made gun. I want to see how well this gun does down the road with a substantial amount of ammo shot through it. My guess is, it will hold up fine. The Ruger in comparison might be a better purchase for some shooters. Both need to be handled and taken to the range to make that decision. (Also, personally do not like the hunky take down lever as your picture shows. It seems Sig could have come up with a better design)
I will be interested to see if Sig does modify the grip down the road as well. The gun overall seemed like a well made gun and reliable Also, I have seen a few articles that the Sig might actually come out with a modular grip like the 320. That would be interesting and maybe worth waiting for.
By the way, I do appreciate your pictures. And Pictures do make great for comparing firearms especially when actually broken down for inspection.