Most durable centerfire repeating handgun

Status
Not open for further replies.
If a Ruger revolver could be shot as frequently as a Glock, I'd bet some comparable round-counts could be achieved. It takes a LOT longer to get 100K rounds through a Blackhawk.
Idk if you where shooting Ruger only loads it would crap out sooner rather than later. I have a super blackhawk from the mid 90s. Almost zero flame cutting. Might be the original owner only shoot 44spl. Not sure but it's clean. And always goes bang. One day my son or daughter will inherit it. Why I buy mostly Rugers and Glock. Did get a century AK to play with. Its okay.
 
Idk if you where shooting Ruger only loads it would crap out sooner rather than later. I have a super blackhawk from the mid 90s. Almost zero flame cutting. Might be the original owner only shoot 44spl. Not sure but it's clean. And always goes bang. One day my son or daughter will inherit it. Why I buy mostly Rugers and Glock. Did get a century AK to play with. Its okay.
That's hardly fair to ruger to use loads that the other guns cant handle.
 
A friend has worn out S&W .38 barrels with target wadcutters. About 150000 of them.
One gun required only a new barrel, the other is pretty loose and the gunsmith who built its rather strange configuration is deceased.
 
I doubt a compact will survive as long as a full sized gun.

When I say compact, the G25 is a G19 but shooting .380acp. So I agree with you that a G17 size will likely last longer than a G19 size regardless of caliber. I'm just not sure Glock made one in .380.

As far as not replacing any parts (even springs) that gives the Blackhawk in a low pressure cartridge some serious merit. However, there's just more to go wrong. Like the MIM parts, such as the hand, breaking.

But the weakest part of a Glock would be the S spring for the trigger. They break too on occasion, from what I hear.
 
Federal has a USP45 they use to test loads. Last I saw it had 500,000 round through and it's still 100% in spec. They send it back to HK every 5k or 10k rounds to have it inspected, springs checked and changed, etc. It's incredibly overbuilt. One writer (is it Todd Green? ) has something like 115,000 through a P30 as well.

I can't afford the ammo to wear out any of my HKs!
 
As I posted on the other thread, another friend managed to wear out a Blackhawk .45. I don't know how many rounds but it was a lot of stout loads.

I used a pair of original Ruger Vaqueros in SASS Competition. Both failed with a week of each other, hammer plunger spring. Far fewer than 100,000 "cowboy" rounds even counting dry fire.
 
The Springfield XDMs are pretty much indescribable. Guns and ammo tv tried to destroy one over a whole season, everything from putting it in a bucket of mud to a vacuum bag full of dirt and dust to throwing it off a 2 story roof and dragging it down a gravel road at 45 mph for a whole mile and shooting a thousand rounds as fast as possible twice during the test and it just kept working. Here's another tough test, 10,000 rounds in 2 days without a single failure!

https://www.thearmorylife.com/xdm10k/
 
There is a discussion over on Glock Talk called "My Glock 21 has proved its worth" or something really close to that.

The poster detailed how he finally shot out the barrel on his Glock 21 after approximately two hundred THOUSAND rounds.

He also detailed how he buried it in the mud and froze it in salt water. I think he even dropped it out of an airplane and it worked through it all.
 
I was going to agree with .455Hunter but looking back, my stainless Blackhawk broke a small internal part at under 1000. I guess I'd go with a G17. My Mark II is well past 50k but it is a rimfire and that number pales next to many others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top