ontarget
Member
That is true of my Taurus 94. My 941 is lighter and smoother.A common complaint on "the innernet" gun forums, is that Taurus .22 revolvers have a very stout double action trigger.
That is true of my Taurus 94. My 941 is lighter and smoother.A common complaint on "the innernet" gun forums, is that Taurus .22 revolvers have a very stout double action trigger.
I was getting ready to post something similar. I sold a Taurus 94 because the trigger was horrible, and my wife had to use both thumbs to pull back the hammer.That is true of my Taurus 94. My 941 is lighter and smoother.
I don’t think it would be as good of an investment as many, many other things but will last longer than a night out on the town with your wife. However, even that is far from a waste of money, even thought it’s all gone and you have nothing to show for it, the next day
HOW WRONG CAN YOU BE? There is no gun, no gun at all, that can compare with a loving wife, a happy home, and a clear conscience. Homes last. God has blessed the union between man and wife, the home being established even before the church!
HOW WRONG CAN YOU BE?
I don’t think it would be as good of an investment as many, many other things but will last longer than a night out on the town with your wife. However, even that is far from a waste of money, even thought it’s all gone and you have nothing to show for it, the next day[/QUOTE
This statement was my bone of contention, that you have nothing to show for it the next day. I'd say a happy wife was plenty to show for the next day, and many days to come.
Bob Wright
HOW WRONG CAN YOU BE? There is no gun, no gun at all, that can compare with a loving wife, a happy home, and a clear conscience. Homes last. God has blessed the union between man and wife, the home being established even before the church!
Bob Wright
you and the other guy who mention JM's wife comment have no comprehension skills at all... or your wife read itn made a face and you came to defend yourself over a comment that did not say what you think it did...
I have read, and reread, the original statement and I fail to see any miscomprehension on my part. Here is the statement " However, even that (money spent on a night out on the town with your wife) is far from a waste of money, even thought it’s all gone and you have nothing to show for it, the next day."
Now you question my reading comprehension skills, it is my contention, and I stand by my remarks, that you do have something to show for the expenditure of treating your wife to an evening's entertainment. The result is a happy home life, that's something to show for your efforts.
And my wife had nothing to do with my remarks.
Bob Wright