silicosys4
Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2012
- Messages
- 3,735
So far everything i've learned about Wranglers.
They are much better than Heritage RR's. Twice the gun, it was said. Head and shoulders above any competitor in its price range. That very well may be SOME peoples experience. But its not my experience.
My experience is that I shouldn't complain about Wrangler build quality because "what do you expect from a sub $200 gun"
I shouldn't complain about the 4" groups from my gun when other people are documenting groups half that size at longer range from theirs because "what do you expect from a sub $200 gun.
I shouldn't complain about obvious QC errors like cerakote in the bore because "what do you expect from a sub $200 gun".
For being twice as good as a RR, Wranglers sure do suck and there are a lot of people here bending over backwards to make excuse after excuse on behalf of a gun that is supposedly superior.
They are much better than Heritage RR's. Twice the gun, it was said. Head and shoulders above any competitor in its price range. That very well may be SOME peoples experience. But its not my experience.
My experience is that I shouldn't complain about Wrangler build quality because "what do you expect from a sub $200 gun"
I shouldn't complain about the 4" groups from my gun when other people are documenting groups half that size at longer range from theirs because "what do you expect from a sub $200 gun.
I shouldn't complain about obvious QC errors like cerakote in the bore because "what do you expect from a sub $200 gun".
For being twice as good as a RR, Wranglers sure do suck and there are a lot of people here bending over backwards to make excuse after excuse on behalf of a gun that is supposedly superior.
Last edited: