Saakee
Member
blue targets? that's just training them to shoot men! That's incredibly sexist! Make the targets a rainbow! then of course the LGBTs would complain. You can never win.
leadcounsel said:What if my training I want to shoot between the eyes, or in the eye or mouth? I can't very well if there's no eyes or mouth!
Just do like Mel Gibson and shoot a face onto your silhouette. Problem solved!
In Austin, id pay 17/hr plus targets to shoot at an indoor range and they would run on by and sweep up my brass after firing.
They are set for the weakest link or lowest common denominator.
Id find another range that's more American aka supports freedom
I've seen some of those ranges that support freedom, scary, REAL SCARY.
It's really scary to allow more than 8 rounds in a magazine?
Or allow zombie targets?
No, not really but I've seen ranges with freedom where the shooters place one of their kids at the top of the hill to signal when the farmer combining the field behind the hill comes in line of fire and then let the shooters know when the farmer is past so they may continue to shoot. This is while the kid stays at the top of said hill keeping look out.
Yup there times total freedom is scary.
Clearly the rules brought up by the OP, and being complained about within this thread, are of an entirely different nature than that.