Auto Ordnance 1911 for "mil-spec" project gun?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dukefan70

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
106
Location
The Communist Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Please hear me out on my reasons for this before anyone pounces. First off, I currently live in MA (which I hope to resolve sooner rather than later) where I can't buy a Colt unless it's a Competition model. Tempting, but I want an old GI plain jane 1911. So I've done hours of reading on here about RIAs, Springfields, Remmy R1s, Inlands, and Auto Ordnances. I'd prefer something made in the USA, so other than a Colt Government model that I can't get, Auto Ordnance looks to be the truest to original form for 1911/1911A1s. Is there anything I'm missing if I decide to get the Auto Ordance and just treat it as a project gun, over time replacing any internals I feel the need to and getting the shim to eliminate the series 80 firing pin block?
 
Auto Ordinance doesn’t have the best reputation, but if you check it out in person before you buy it, why not.

I am not sure why you would want to take out the drop safety. If it messes with your trigger pull there are things you can do to fix the trigger pull without taking out the safety. Also keep in mind that a lot of series 80 guns (not at all sure about AO guns) have a different hammer. And a lot of series 70 type guns (not at all sure about AO guns) use a different firing pin. In the end its your gun, but you may want to be careful not to drop it.
 
The old AO guns were the ones with the bad reputation. Kahr bought them out several years back and since then I have not heard about any issues. If you do get the Kahr made AO then it will be close to the "mil-spec" gun you desire. For conversation, can't you buy an existing Colt that you desire or do you want to stay away from used guns? Also, why can't you buy a new Colt there? It only has a 7-8 round mag. What can be so onerous about a Colt?
 
The Auto Ordnance / Kahr is pretty close to the WW2 GI gun. (I have two of them.) As you point out, the biggest difference is that it has the Series 80 style firing pin safety. To remove that, you need the special spacer for the frame. You should also replace the firing pin, firing pin spring, firing pin retainer plate, and extractor with GI parts. On mine, I also replaced the magazines, grip safeties, recoil spring plugs, and triggers for maximum authenticity. (AO uses an "intermediate" trigger that is neither the long nor the short type.)

If all I wanted was a shooter, I wouldn't have bothered with any of this stuff. But I'm a collector, and authenticity is important to me.
 
I know it's a sample size of one, but my post Kahr takeover AO 1911 hasn't had any issues. I think they're a great RIA alternative that's made in the USA.
 
I think they're a great RIA alternative that's made in the USA.
Now that you mention the RIA guns, they require a lot more work to make into WW2 clones than do the AO / Kahr guns. I did it, simply because I had a couple of spare GI slides and barrels. Otherwise, an RIA gun needs too much parts replacement to make such a project economically viable. (This even though they do not have the Series 80 firing pin block.)
 
I have an Auto Ordinance 1911 (70 Series) bought new in the early 1990s before Kahr bought them.

It needed a little tuning up to get it to shoot reliably with 230 FMJ ammunition, a little polishing here, a little rounding sharp edges there but nothing drastic.

The biggest improvement I made several years after I bought the gun was to replace the barrel. I re-barreled a Colt 1911 to 38/45 Clerke and took the removed, old Colt 45 ACP barrel and installed it in the Auto Ordinance. Accuracy improved dramatically.

Just a single data point but I'd take on another pre-Kahr Auto Ordinance.

If you are not familiar with the innards of a 1911, there are several good books out there that detail the workings of the 1911.
 
I have an AO 1911, parkerized. I bought a short trigger off Ebay to get it closer to a WWII clone. The AO website isn’t clear, they all come with medium length triggers.
 
Wow thanks everyone for the responses.

Auto Ordinance doesn’t have the best reputation, but if you check it out in person before you buy it, why not.

I am not sure why you would want to take out the drop safety. If it messes with your trigger pull there are things you can do to fix the trigger pull without taking out the safety. Also keep in mind that a lot of series 80 guns (not at all sure about AO guns) have a different hammer. And a lot of series 70 type guns (not at all sure about AO guns) use a different firing pin. In the end its your gun, but you may want to be careful not to drop it.

rskent, I did a bunch of reading on series 70, pre-series 70, and series 80 too. I'm more educated but not really any more sure what I care for than before. I'm not sure I would remove the firing pin block, just saying I could if I wanted to make it as original as possible.

The old AO guns were the ones with the bad reputation. Kahr bought them out several years back and since then I have not heard about any issues. If you do get the Kahr made AO then it will be close to the "mil-spec" gun you desire. For conversation, can't you buy an existing Colt that you desire or do you want to stay away from used guns? Also, why can't you buy a new Colt there? It only has a 7-8 round mag. What can be so onerous about a Colt?

larryh, don't make the mistake of trying to apply logic to Massachusetts...the whole state is impervious to it. Because we couldn't buy them new at all for so long here, existing Colt's in the state are VERY expensive. You could drop $2,000 easily. As for new ones, it's only very recently the Competition models only were allowed in. It's not the mag capacity (we're still 10 rounds for new guns here), it's the AG's list. You see every handgun sold in MA has to be approved on two lists, the AG's and another I forget what it's called or who's in charge of it. If a handgun is on one and not the other, it's a no go. Unless as in the case of glocks and other things you're a government employee or someone THEY think is trustworthy, then they will allow you to have it. It's very arbitrary and they can pretty much do whatever they want with it, as demonstrated by the fiat decision on no new ARs and AKs (and according to them, if you already own one they won't do anything about it "for now").

The Auto Ordnance / Kahr is pretty close to the WW2 GI gun. (I have two of them.) As you point out, the biggest difference is that it has the Series 80 style firing pin safety. To remove that, you need the special spacer for the frame. You should also replace the firing pin, firing pin spring, firing pin retainer plate, and extractor with GI parts. On mine, I also replaced the magazines, grip safeties, recoil spring plugs, and triggers for maximum authenticity. (AO uses an "intermediate" trigger that is neither the long nor the short type.)

If all I wanted was a shooter, I wouldn't have bothered with any of this stuff. But I'm a collector, and authenticity is important to me.

AlexanderA, when you say GI parts do you mean GI spec or are you getting GI surplus innards from somewhere? And where are some places you've used for parts? Thank you.
 
Now that you mention the RIA guns, they require a lot more work to make into WW2 clones than do the AO / Kahr guns.

What does the RIA lack from USGI besides trigger, grips, and markings?

I know Slamfire likes his, but he is more interested in good metallurgy than reenactment.
 
What does the RIA lack from USGI besides trigger, grips, and markings?
The sights are taller, and the ejection port is beveled. These are probably improvements from a shooting standpoint, but they mean that the whole slide has to be replaced if you want a WW2 look-alike.

A host of the smaller parts such as triggers, hammers, mainspring housings, thumb and grip safeties, etc., are either not as good as the GI parts, or differ from them significantly. The grips and magazines are completely different.

I built two WW2 clones from RIA guns. I ended up replacing almost everything except the bare frames and a few small parts such as magazine releases. (I had most of the parts in my spares stash, or this wouldn't have been doable.)

The Auto Ordnance / Kahr is a much better starting point if you want a WW2 GI gun.
AlexanderA, when you say GI parts do you mean GI spec or are you getting GI surplus innards from somewhere? And where are some places you've used for parts? Thank you.
Actual GI parts. I had most of what I needed, including barrels and slides, in my spares stash from years ago. The rest I picked up at gun shows. (I've been doing this stuff for about 50 years.)
 
Good information, but mostly I just don't care. If I want to shoot GI, I get out my GI. Not much because the collectors tell me that if I shoot it, it will break.
 
I have a recent-production AO. Runs just fine. Parts all work--and without having to mike and stone them, either.
Looks the treat, too:
h7bGQK_blvwlpdpRLyNrFuKyd9C6hoMLAAn9q_IgG1ZQHm3EuelodEyOABm1_7JV5vHPVmsjcIjUnPZQG4=w1062-h797-no.jpg
Mind, I was looking specifically for things like arched mainspring housing, and the GI "short" trigger. Sights are GI as well--which can be off-putting to those used to modern sights. Really not much to fuss with, other than the Series 80 parts, which are all internal. And, it does not bear a "U.S. Property" roll mark--I'm ok with both of those.
 
Actual GI parts. I had most of what I needed, including barrels and slides, in my spares stash from years ago. The rest I picked up at gun shows. (I've been doing this stuff for about 50 years.)

Oh boy. I wonder what the availability of those parts will be up in these parts. Thanks for the info, though. Much appreciated.

I have a recent-production AO. Runs just fine. Parts all work--and without having to mike and stone them, either.
Looks the treat, too:
index.php

Looks great, Capn!
 
dukefan70

If you're looking for the closest to the original M1911A1 and made in the U.S. then I would say go with a new Auto Ordnance. I got a Springfield Armory M1911A1 not long after they were first introduced here. Was wanting pretty much a basic 1911 for the range and back then Colt Governments were more money and harder to come by. Mine is pretty much G.I. issue except for the slanted slide serrations. Never bothered me in the slightest and it's a solid, well made pistol.

IYT8bDM.jpg
 
If you're looking for the closest to the original M1911A1 and made in the U.S. then I would say go with a new Auto Ordnance. I got a Springfield Armory M1911A1 not long after they were first introduced here. Was wanting pretty much a basic 1911 for the range and back then Colt Governments were more money and harder to come by. Mine is pretty much G.I. issue except for the slanted slide serrations. Never bothered me in the slightest and it's a solid, well made pistol.

bannockburn, first of all nice name. Cool historical reference. Thanks for the feedback. I had noticed the slanted slide serrations, but probably what made up my mind on the Springfield more (besides not USA made) was the modern sights. Yet yours are the old combat sights. Were those stock when you got yours?

My grandfathers are with the Lord now but they were in the service in WWII. They never saw combat that I heard about (one was on a Navy cruiser in the latter part of the war at 17 years old, the other did telegraph lines in Patton's 3rd Army), but getting something true to what they qualified on would make me happy. A big part of that to me is the basic sights many of us are so not used to today. Raises the hair on my neck trying to imagine using it against charging Japs in the dark or a midnight prisoner raid on a Kraut FOP! Point and shoot indeed.

I had a newer one as well, I shot over 2k rounds of tula, 300 Winchester defender ammo, 975 Winchester whitebox out of it... Not one hiccup, however get rid of the mag it comes with and get more reputable mags

Evangelist Cowboy, great to know. And cool avatar.
 
dukefan70

I think when Springfield Armory first introduced the M1911A1 in the U.S. the parts were made in Brazil (by Imbel?), and then imported and assembled here. This was around 1986/87 and the retail price was like $249. The first production run sold very quickly, to both shooters and custom gunmakers. I saw one of these early models and it had a dark gray parkerized finish along with some black checkered plastic grips. The gun didn't impress me all that much but at that price it sure had a Colt Government beat. Next time I saw an ad for them in a gun magazine the price had gone up to $279 or $289 and this was when I picked one up. The finish was better (now a more evenly applied gray/green parkerizing), the fit and finish was definitely improved, and the gun was well built overall. I have seen both straight and slanted slide serrations on these guns but don't know why they are that way. Everything else: the small thumb safety, the short trigger, and the tiny original sights, are all box stock on my gun.
 
The other list the OP refers to is the EOPS list. The lists only apply to dealers if you have a pistol/revolver privately owned and not on the list you can sell it but as in supply and demand the purchase/sale price is going to be steep.
 
My experience with AO 1911 guns (only four) that friends had and I tried has not been good but that was a while back, ten years or more. Maybe the Kahr group improved them. I'd try it first.
 
When I felt the GI 1911 urge, got lucky and built my own.
Lucked into a new Colt O1918 top end from a police recovered gun. Presume they destroyed the frame.
Purchased a Caspian 1911 frame and built it into a facsimile of an AA rebuilt 1911 I shot in the Army.
Looks pretty close to an original:
1911aa.jpg
 
When I felt the GI 1911 urge, got lucky and built my own......Purchased a Caspian 1911 frame and built it into a facsimile
If all you need is a frame for a GI build, the RIA (Armscor) is good for this purpose. (I believe Sarco carries the stripped frames.) The RIA frame is not machined for the Series 80 firing pin safety, although it does have a beveled mag well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top