Hey, Hokie, sorry to get a little uptight about it... I just get sick of the left playing these games. He may be a great choice but to select him because he is a well spoken black guy is not the right way to go IMO. I don't want to play the same games as the left which does divide our country.. Again, I get your point but..... no... Again, sorry for the rant...
Not to belabor the point but the left is not going to like anyone that assumes the post of President of the NRA. The main job of the President of the NRA is to rally the troops not to please the opposition. That is a fools errand.
I have a good friend that is an avid hunter and gun owner. He hates the NRA. Why? Because about 10 years ago a lady was hit by a stray bullet from a hunter that took an ill-advised shot. The lady sued and won but the NRA didn't get involved. So this is why my friend doesn't like the NRA.
What my friend doesn't want to understand is that the lady didn't sue due to the 2nd amendment. She actually sued the landowner for not supervising the hunter that he had allowed to hunt on his land. There was nothing to do with the RKBA, it was a
civil liability lawsuit.
Also, what my friend doesn't understand is that it isn't generally the national NRA organization that gets involved in actual court cases, rather it's the state NRA affiliate, in this case, The Pennsylvania Rifle and Pistol Association. Also, the purpose of the NRA is not to be a free legal resource for anyone (including non-members) involved in any kind of legal pickle that has firearms somewhere in the equation. Had the above mentioned lawsuit put existing case law to the test then the state affiliate would have stepped in to assist but most likely on appeal. Or had the incident spurred state lawmakers to introduce legislation to further restrict gun rights. So my friend is very badly misinformed on the role of the NRA and will not listen to the facts and thus change his mind. Sometimes we are too stubborn for our own good. I am convinced that he simply doesn't want to pay $35.00 to be a member and is trying to rationalize that lack of action.
It is my opinion that not only should gun owners be members of the NRA, they should also be members of their respective state affiliate. I gladly support The Pennsylvania Rifle and Pistol Association, since they are the ones that get involved in steering legislation at the state level. I also belong to the Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs, the state NRA affiliate for NJ. I shoot matches in NJ and thus want to support the 2nd amendment causes in that state.
And before anyone asks, yes I'm a member of GOA. While the NRA is annoying in their constant fund raising, GOA is annoying in that they are somewhat disorganized. But both, flawed as they are, are fighting the good fight and we should all be members.
End of lecture.