My Experience With Taurus

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr. Mosin

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2019
Messages
2,112
My cousin bought a Taurus 608 (.357 Magnum, 8 shot, 6 inch ported barrel). Second day he had it, he brought it to me to look over and shoot. I looked it over. The cylinder locked up... tolerably, the cylinder latch had a gap that I could put a US dime, probably a quarter; between it and the frame (and no, tightening the screw didn't help). The barrel ports were not cleanly cut; and the rear sight was wobbling like the belly of a fat woman doing the hula. I attributed it to a loose screw, and set to it.

Reluctantly, I loaded it at the seven yard line and fired eight 158 grn .38's through it. Tweaked the sights, and fired another cylinder's worth of .38's through it. It shot to point of aim, so I loaded a cylinder's worth of 158 grn .357's in it, and fired em. The ported barrel helped... absolutely none. At this point, praying to God Almighty that this thing wouldn't blow up in my hands, I loaded a mixed cylinder of .357's and .38's, and dumped the cylinder into the target... or intended to. One hit on target, out of eight.

I thought to myself "Hmm. It's been a while, but I can't be *THAT* rusty." Looked it over, sights were out of wack. Set em back to were I had em; and fired another cylinder through it. Nada. Junk.

At this point, the cylinder was barely locking up, and I could easily slide a quarter in between the cylinder latch and frame.

I my cousin (who holds a very well paying job, and at this time was a bachelor with few bills) that he should have put another $100 with what he paid, and bought a S&W 686 or Ruger GP100,b done with it; and have a gun he could pass on to his kids, not a $650 paperweight. He didn't like that too much. Liked it even less when I told him he should peruse the used counter at our local pawn shops; that one of our mutual friends has a 75 year old S&W .38 (the M&P Victory I've discussed in the past) that locks up tighter, functions better; and is more accurate than his new piece of junk.

It would be different if he was scraping together bit by bit, and could barely afford said gun, but when your making 10k a month, with nothing but a phone bill, truck insurance, and fuel bill, you aught have no issue buying almost anything the average Joe wants. I feel no pity if you were too cheap to go with a reputable manufacturer instead of Taurus (and no, current Taurus doesn't class as a 'reputable manufacturer' in my book).
 
While I have no love for Taurus autos, the few revolvers that I have owned or shot have all been decent, though it has been a few years. It would be a shame if their QA is slipping there, too. Some have had some minor issues here and there, but this is definitely on the low end of reviews. So, did he buy it brand new?
 
While I have no love for Taurus autos, the few revolvers that I have owned or shot have all been decent, though it has been a few years. It would be a shame if their QA is slipping there, too. Some have had some minor issues here and there, but this is definitely on the low end of reviews. So, did he buy it brand new?


Brand R New, box, paperwork and all.
 
I've had a 605, 617, and two 905s. They all shot well enough and had no mechanical issues, before I sold or traded them. Also decent triggers. The 905s were good cosmetically. The 605 had buggered screws and rough internals. The 617 had throats that were unevenly and inconsistently chamfered, but good everywhere else. All were functional, and I regret selling the stainless 905 (which had no problems) and shot well.

Hit and miss, and I would say never a mistake to choose a smith or ruger instead.
 
I'm one of those folks who has never had an issue with Taurus, owning or once owning about a dozen. Two of those were revolvers, the 85CH and 669, and both work great.

Though I sold all my Taurus autos except for a TCP, Spectrum, PT111 and G2C (all having a role to fill), I wouldn't hesitate buying another if the price was right.

All manufactures turn out lemons, some more than others. Taurus seems to have had their fair share, though I have yet to end up with one.
 
Sorry your relative got a lemon. I've had experience with 3 Tauruses, a 32 Magnum revolver, a 22 pump rifle, and a small-frame 22 revolver. All were decent guns that worked OK and were worth what they cost, but all were bought 20+ years ago. I would be startled to hear that Taurus no longer qualifies as a "reputable manufacturer." Does anyone else think that is the case?

BTW, Mr. Mosin, is your cousin planning to see if Taurus will fix or replace this gun?
 
I have owned about a dozen. One was a lemon that the factory fixed for free. The rest worked fine. Some had stiff triggers, some okay, a few very good. The older ones seem generally better than the newer ones, IMHO.
 
Sorry your relative got a lemon. I've had experience with 3 Tauruses, a 32 Magnum revolver, a 22 pump rifle, and a small-frame 22 revolver. All were decent guns that worked OK and were worth what they cost, but all were bought 20+ years ago. I would be startled to hear that Taurus no longer qualifies as a "reputable manufacturer." Does anyone else think that is the case?

BTW, Mr. Mosin, is your cousin planning to see if Taurus will fix or replace this gun?

I should have told him to carry it back to whatever garbage pit he dug it out of, and keep digging for a S&W or Ruger. But to answer your question, no. He's still carrying that hunk of junk
 
My 605 does try duty. Maybe 900 rounds without a hitch and gets shot monthly. When they are good they are good, when they are bad, it usually is dumpster fire bad.
Lame lazy Q C in a second world country.

"Dumpster fire" ??? I think you meant "monkey gunsmith shop reject"
 
My 605 does try duty. Maybe 900 rounds without a hitch and gets shot monthly. When they are good they are good, when they are bad, it usually is dumpster fire bad.
Lame lazy Q C in a second world country.
That mirrors my experience. I've never owned a Taurus revolver, but I have shot three different ones owned by friends. All three happened to have major issues that required factory service. Another friend had one as well and it too had major timing issues, though I never shot that one. I know there's a lot of really good ones out there and their owners love them. But when they are bad, they are real bad.

Personally, with Rugers, Smiths, and the new line of Colts available for only a few hundred dollars more, I don't even consider Taurus.
 
There is an option...Send it back to Taurus. I am sure they will fix it. I have never dealt with them but if it’s a new gun and hasn’t been monkeyed with they should address the issues.
 
I think its funny that the OP has been here two months to the day and started more threads about different guns and their life span and durability and what loads to use and now he is a revolver expert and Taurus critic. Gotta love the internet.:rofl:

I have owned 8-10 Taurus revolvers and two autos and never had any problems with any of them. The model 85s I have owned have been just about as good as any S&W J-Frame I have handled. I sold my last one to a bud and he still has it and will not sell it back to me. I should never have sold that gun.
 
My "Internet" experience with Taurus has been the reading of other people's posted opinions. Taking these in aggregate I came away with an untested opinion that some models are worthy and others less so. My "real" experience has been with three Taurus revolvers bought used and new. All have worked fine. But, I am careful to inspect in hand prior to purchase, not pay too much, and feel good about getting something workable at a relatively low price.

As a sample - I inspected and rejected two 856 stainless revolvers before accepting the third one as good enough for the <$300 price. This doesn't speak well for the factory QC, but I wanted a stainless 6-shot 38 snub and didn't feel like dropping $700 on a Colt ( not yet, anyway :) ).

I think the OP's cousin's error was in having him look at it after buying it and not before. But then again, I'd inspect any brand of revolver before buying to avoid trouble at the start.

Sending it back for repair would be an option, or maybe just some blue locktite to keep the sights where they are good.
 
Good reviews about Taurus model 66 and LGS here is having big Taurus sale with M66 $299. If really needed would probably buy one.
 
Last edited:
I had to replace the innards of my PT1911....after 13 years of shooting it. And I took the sights off my PT145 to be able to hit what I was aiming at. That one is on me. My son had a Taurus 66 .357 that was a great gun, he took a deer with it, and 'lost' it under his tree stand overnight, all I had to do was gentle remove a little 'bloom' rust. I'm happy with Taurus guns, the PT111G2 is on my short list for next carry gun.
 
I just bought my first Taurus ! It is a stainless Public defender .45/.410 and I bought it used for $300+ship ect. I bought it used as I didn't want to buy a new one that might be defective and I would have to deal with it and they are more expensive, this one had a few boxes of ammo thru it with no problems and looks good. I was looking at the new Poly Public Defenders which are 6 .oz lighter and cost only $75 more new , but no thanks. this one is about 5 years old . I will put up pictures when I shoot it, I have lots of .45 Colt loaded and lots of .410 shells in 2 1/2" inches which it takes . It will be an RV gun mostly but may open carry it in little towns which I visit as it looks imposing and weighs 28 .oz which is 2 pounds loaded and that is a reasonable weight to pack for a few hours . I bought this gun instead of a New Charter .45 Colt XL after thinking about it. I have great old .44 Bulldogs and it is only a little bigger and heavier than a new XL . I certainly won't be shooting this Taurus alot , and not a great lost if somehow I lose it . I am kinda impressed by the Hornady load of a tipped bullet and two balls with low flash powder. The Federal Premium 4 pellet OOO handgun load looks good too.
 
Last edited:
I think the OP's cousin's error was in having him look at it after buying it and not before. But then again, I'd inspect any brand of revolver before buying to avoid trouble at the start.

Best answer so far. I like Taurus but have read enough negative reviews like the OPs that if I were to buy another I want to inspect it in person. I just bought a TCP 380 off GB and its in like new condition and works perfectly. No complaints at all.

And I suspect the OP does know a bit about guns and doesn't mind me pulling his chain a little.:evil: But I have read several negative reviews on guns from most makers in the last couple of years. Have a look at what this guy found on his new S&W 460 Performance Center gun. I wouldn't be happy either if I got what he got for the price he paid. https://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=602792

So sometimes bad guns get out. And the owners are vocal about it. But you don't hear a lot about the guns that are fine and work as they are supposed to.
 
I own two of the large-frame Taurus revolvers, an M607 and an M608. Zero problems with either one and the M607 shoots the much hotter .360 Dan Wesson. Both will print 2" groups at 25 yards with factory sights and these 65 year old eyes ain't what they used to be.
Every maker produces a bad product on occasion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top