AMT 22LR Lightning: Do You Have One?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Confederate

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
3,402
Location
Arlington, VA
Years ago I bought one of them. I took it to the range and ran about 70 rounds through it with no malfunctions. I then brought it home, thoroughly cleaned it and it's been sitting in my safe ever since. It's too good to get rid of, but wasn't fun to shoot. The sights were Milletts (one of the best) and the trigger was a professional make and was competition grade, being fully adjustable. The barrel has a recessed bore and the grips are rubber wrap-arounds, like those made by Pachmayr.


The reason I haven't shot it is because it's more of a competition pistol, and I tend to shoot for fun. But when I came across the above photos, I wondered if anyone else has one of these and whether they've had any problems with them, and whether they shoot them often.

It's a great gun. If someone took a Ruger and customized it, they'd have an AMT Lightning. Oh yes, at the time it came out, Ruger didn't have any stainless guns except the 1 in 5,000 model that cost an arm and a leg. I think Ruger threatened to take AMT to court shortly after the pistol was introduced. Ruger and AMT apparently reached an agreement and the AMT vanished.

So does anyone else have one of these pistols? And if so, what do you know about them?

..
 
How about an AMT Lightning magazine?

When I needed an extra magazine for my Ruger MkII for a match that required four magazine changes, I found an orphan AMT Lightning magazine cheap in the odds and ends table at a sporting goods store. (This was after Ruger stopped AMT from selling their gun.) The magazine was compatible with the MkII except did not lock the bolt open on last shot. I made sure it was my last magazine in the pouch.

25 years later when I ordered new recoil spring for my MkII, I bought a Ruger magazine spring and plunger which fit the AMT magazine and made it activate the last shot bolt open feature of the MkII.

As I recall though, the AMT Lightning preceded the MkII and copied the Ruger Standard & MkI with improvements (10 rd magazine, bolt hold lock open separate from the safety, and last shot bolt open triggered by magazine follower).

The compatibility of the AMT magazine with the Ruger MkII pistol demonstrated to me that the AMT Lightning is a very close copy and ought to be credited with inspiring the MkII.
 
I bought about 6 or 7 magazines and used two of them in my Ruger, and they worked fine. I don't know what I did with them, and I assume I still have them somewhere. I heard there were some reliability issues with the AMT Lightnings, which is why I checked it out. A friend of mine bought the same model I had, and he had nothing but problems. He took it back to the place he bought it and got a refund. He then purchased [another] Ruger. I bought my AMT because it was stainless steel and I loved the sights. The trigger was a competition-style trigger and tended to go off with the slightest touch. It's a great gun, but for plinking, I prefer more take-up.

..
 
I had completely forgotten that the Lightning had a slab sided receiver. That seems odd to me, because I thought the use of a tubular receiver by Ruger was a part of the design that kept costs down. I suppose that reflects changes in manufacturing processes and costs between the late 1940's and the mid 1980's. (I think that's when I think the Lightning came out, but I could be wrong.)
 
I have the one I've had since the mid 1980s. I also had some Rugers but kept only the AMT once I tried some other semi-autos that I liked better.

34Aas53.jpg

EDIT: here's a better photo where the stainless isn't so blown out and you can see more detail.
VtSaTHv.jpg
 
I never bought any as a dealer back then because I was informed that AMT had no liability insurance.

As to the truth of that I don’t know, but I wasn’t willing to risk it.
 
I never bought any as a dealer back then because I was informed that AMT had no liability insurance. As to the truth of that I don’t know, but I wasn’t willing to risk it.
As a personal gun owner, would you consider owning one? And does Ruger have liability insurance? Is that annoying warning on the Rugers a part of its liability? When I was a dealer back then, I never inquired about such insurance. I'd never heard of any liability lawsuits, either. That doesn't mean I was right; perhaps I was blissfully wrong. Most of my sales were to federal agents (whom I knew) and to other friends.

Are most gun manufacturers insured today, and is it an issue for most dealers?

--
 
As a personal gun owner, would you consider owning one? And does Ruger have liability insurance? Is that annoying warning on the Rugers a part of its liability? When I was a dealer back then, I never inquired about such insurance. I'd never heard of any liability lawsuits, either. That doesn't mean I was right; perhaps I was blissfully wrong. Most of my sales were to federal agents (whom I knew) and to other friends.

Are most gun manufacturers insured today, and is it an issue for most dealers?

--

I really don’t know the Ins and outs on liability insurance. However I would think that any company worth their salt has it; otherwise Joe Blow would be owning them if a defective gun caused an injury. It does happen; I have friend that shot a defective Remington rifle and almost lost an eye. Remington immediately showered him with money so he wouldn’t sue and cause their liability insurance to increase. That was 30 years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top