CZ 457 Precision Chassis Review

Status
Not open for further replies.
I bought a CZ 457, because many have bragged about how well they shoot. I wasn’t very impressed with my results using ammunition that other .22’s I have prefer. About to give up on it, already bought a 17 barrel/mag for it and ammo but decided to give it the same fair shake I give all .22’s and try at least one group with everything I’ve got. Turns out it really hums with a particular brand of standard velocity ammunition (they didn’t even charge extra or market it as subsonic). Unfortunately it’s not a flavor others prefer so I don’t have thousands upon thousands around.

I guess the point is, it’s worth trying stuff you might otherwise ignore. Not going to be easy in today’s ‘get what you can’ market; however, if you’ve got ‘junk’ ammo pushed off to the side, you might blow the dust off the box and give it a try.
 
The CZ455 Standard I owned performed quite differently depending on the ammunition it was fed. I hope to find types of ammunition my new rifle prefers when I get to shoot it. I bought many different brands and types of ammunition (more than 20 if memory serves me) to test specifically for the two new .22 LR rifles. I bought only two different kinds for the .30-06 Springfield, but plan to try more in the future. It is a great part of the fun for me to shoot, measure and document the results. I am always surprised by the differences even within the same brand or between brands for similar types of ammunition. More than one here has mentioned noticeable variations between batches of the same exact ammo. I don't have the highest round count on this forum for certain, but I have come to think that .22 LR rifles are more picky than centerfire calibers with regards to the ammunition chosen.
 
Follow up:

My daughter FINALLY decided to take a real interest in shooting last weekend and in the process, she took my CZ 457 Chassis rifle. After a few hundred rounds the rifle seemed to come into it’s own as a shooter. Her first group at 25 yards was pretty impressive for an eleven year old whom has never gotten behind a rifle to shoot a group. See the photo below.
C8683534-A1F1-4768-B91C-450452BED184.jpeg
After she got comfortable, we decided to have a few friendly competitions between myself, my daughter and my best friend. All she wanted to do was beat Uncle Mikey. She came up short, but she won herself a rifle. 45F1920D-972D-46F2-B1D9-BE84CB78DB1F.jpeg

Well, after losing my rifle, I had to pick up a replacement. I decided on a CZ 457 Varmint Precision Trainer with the 20.5” barrel. The dealer was under the impression that the barrel would be threaded, but I hadn’t seen a 20.5” model with a threaded barrel in my internet searches. Sure enough, the rifle arrived today and the barrel is not threaded. No worries though. I’m still pretty happy with the rifle. B2CA1AFB-8027-4736-9D41-6E348AC00492.jpeg
Just like the chassis rifle, this rifle is going to need some breaking in, but it has gotten progressively better. I started it off at 25 yards to get a good zero and then moved out to 50 yards to shoot a few groups. Ammo used was Fiocchi Exacta Winter. First group at fifty was fired at the center target. I then moved to the top right target and moved counter-clockwise to shoot my final group in the bottom right target. None of the five groups were particularly impressive, but the groups did get progressively better. I’m looking forward to spending some real time behind this rifle on Monday to get it broken in and try to shoot some better groups. 760830E1-CCBE-45E0-8A44-F5197AEF5A67.jpeg
 
Trying to shoot groups with a CZ with less than 200 rounds through it is a fool’s errand. I’ve had two. Same thing. Gotta break them in.

My .204 shot basically shotgun patterns at 100. I’m talking 6-8” groups. As I ran more rounds through it, progressively got better. Last I checked with my handloads it was shooting sub 1/2”.

Same thing with my CZ .22.
 
Trying to shoot groups with a CZ with less than 200 rounds through it is a fool’s errand. I’ve had two. Same thing. Gotta break them in.

My .204 shot basically shotgun patterns at 100. I’m talking 6-8” groups. As I ran more rounds through it, progressively got better. Last I checked with my handloads it was shooting sub 1/2”.

Same thing with my CZ .22.

Update: I just needed to find it’s load! This thing will flat out shoot the Federal Auto Match bulk ammo! That’s five rounds at fifty yards. ECC1A704-EE33-4172-B181-B0DE0501E3FF.jpeg
 
You’ll most likely find that it will shoot everything better now, once you get past the magic point of getting the barrel set Mine was awful with everything including very expensive target ammo.

A lot of CZs like Wolf Match Extra. Mine does OK with Federal ,but better with Wolf.

That’s a NICE group. Some wonder why CZ is so popular among guys that own them. Now you know.
 
You’ll most likely find that it will shoot everything better now, once you get past the magic point of getting the barrel set Mine was awful with everything including very expensive target ammo.

A lot of CZs like Wolf Match Extra. Mine does OK with Federal ,but better with Wolf.

That’s a NICE group. Some wonder why CZ is so popular among guys that own them. Now you know.
I’ve been a CZ fan for a loooong time. I just wish they’d stop putting those ridiculous 11mm dovetails on their rimfire rifles. Area 419 must be giving them some kickbacks or something.
 
I had my 457 and Marlin XT out today. I wanted to do a head to head grouping comparison at 100 yards with them. Shooting CCI Maxi mags. But the wind was messing me up. At 50 they both were equal.

The wind was outrageous at my place today too. No need in shooting groups, but I swapped scopes, so I shot enough to get a rough re-zero this afternoon. I put the Bushnell Forge back on my daughter’s rifle and moved a Zeiss Conquest V4 6-24x50 onto my new rifle. The Vortex rings I had laying around are a little high, but the cheek pad makes it work.
95C19FD6-819A-4DBE-8457-2ED3F12AE026.jpeg
 
Finally had a chance to shoot. Love the rifle. So far the best guestimate group was hovering around 2" at 100 yards in 30 km/h wind. Will do another thread for real results. Congratulating myself is in order for the scope. Bought something good and I enjoy. Turrets are the way to go for that rifle and I enjoy using them for the first time. I did not put any on the .30-06 and feel equally well about it. Different uses, different gear.
 
A7EC5ED9-3713-4FAF-8128-D617A1DC1882.jpeg Best hundred yard five shot group of the morning with Aguila 40 grain lead bullets. I think it was Competition Rifle or something to that effect. The other groups were closer to 1 1/2” or so.
 
I am glad that you got your rifle to shoot. My first CZ took some adjusting and breaking in too, but it became a match-winning laser.
 
Looking good.

I have found that some barrels are sensitive to ammo change. My Bergara for instance, will take about 10 rounds of the new ammo to fully settle in. It isn't a whole lot, around .2" at 50 but it is enough that the scope will have to be adjusted a click or two to get back to zero.
 
In defense of the .22WMR barrel/cartridge: I don't believe that the difference in grouping ability between the .17 barrel/cartridge and the .22 Mag pairing made any practical difference in killing ability on critters that I sought to bag, but I like the flatness off trajectory and seemingly better performance on varmints afforded by the ammo.
 
Best hundred yard five shot group of the morning with Aguila 40 grain lead bullets. I think it was Competition Rifle or something to that effect.

Their “Standard velocity” (left) is what seemed to work the best in the one I have.

4890ACB4-AB90-4564-B744-7501BC5316D8.jpeg

I happened along this hog a few weeks ago across a pond.

AC50F1BA-A306-46E1-A017-52E228EBEDCA.jpeg

Didn’t take a single step with one shot to the bean.

8B1586F0-85D5-436F-B564-B30E4E15C5C6.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top