Alright Lets See Those Assault Rifles

My Plum stocked Bulgy '74 I built from a kit (need to redo on a 100% receiver, not totally happy w/ the results from my bent blank build):


My SAR1 that I refinished the metal and wood on, love it:

My Colt Tactical Carbine before the BUIS.



And my SAR-48 before the scope

It really bothers me what the mass media and ignorant politicians have done to our lexicon.

An "assault rifle" is a select fire intermediate caliber rifle.

An "assult weapon" is a made up gun-grabbing political term, based upon absurdly arbitrary definitions.

And, now we have people on a gun forum calling an "evil looking" semi-automatic an "assault rifle", even though it most certainly is not.

Here's mine. Gotta love the THR terminology fusses

KILL THE SPIDER, SpeedAKL!!!!

Nice way to make an introduction! Welcome to THR

Frank:

LOL, I just noticed that. We get a lot of those wolf spiders in the basement back home. They range in size from about the size of a quarter to a few inches across. While .223 is always argued over in regards to its stopping power, I'm sure it would be more than enough for a spider

welcome to thr. nice set ups you have there. btw i don't own any "assault" rifles, i own semi auto matic rifle that iuse to do paperwork at the range and train with.

I don't have an "assault rifle" and probably never will, but I do have this very nice sporting rifle.

I really would like to buy a VZ.58 but I'm pretty convinced on getting another 1911...

Where did you get the stock for the Glock?

Local gun store, they're fairly common but fairly pricey too. My gf got it for me for christmas, it was about 150$

I was shooting +P hollowpoints with the stock at 50 yards hitting the paper, considering without it I would hit the paper 1/10 I thought it was a big improvement.

Nice to see some AKs and ARs that don't need batteries to aim them.

PaStEuRiZeD said:

Where did you get the stock for the Glock?

Click to expand...

Please note the location of that poster. In Canada, the gun laws are more stringent in some ways, but less stringent in others.

These are all tecnically weapons that can be used for assault, and they all have rifled barrels:











And just for kicks, those are automatic weapons

To the people criticizing the thread's title - I agree that "assault rifle" is a term that should be avoid, but not because it has a precise definition that's being used incorrectly. The second assault rifle ever designed was a semi-auto only.

The term should be avoided because its definition is imprecise, it is a political hot-button, and it causes endless semantic debates.

OK, here's my Assault Rifle.
Yes, it's a full-auto in an intermediate caliber. Any more Naysayers?

And a SBR to boot!

here you go There's no such thing as cover

that's a 5.56 nato round hiding in the empty

M1A Scout

SA M1A Scout w/ Leupold 2.5x Scout scope
- pretty handy in the woods for hog and deer hunting. Got an AAC 762SD waiting in the safe for whenever AAC gets the M1A/M14 suppressor mounts out.

you are right... the mp5 is a submachine gun

does this apply as a assault weapon?

I don't own an "assult rifle", I do own a few "Sport Utility Rifles"... but Ted Kennedys car has still killed more people than any of my personally owned rifles.

CMMG Lowers, RRA everything else; RRA Tactical Entry and RRA Nation Match



Same CMMG lower collapsable stock with a total frankenstein upper, 18" with a Tasco 6-24x42 scope, don't laugh at this cheap SPR, $60.80 out of pocket cost



I don't have pictures of the Fulton .308 waiting on it's TAC-20 upper from DPMS... only 12 more weeks of a 16 week wait

mak-90 and bushmaster ar

Robinson M96