romma
Member
Glad you weren't seriously hurt.. Welcome to THR! Nice pics btw.
I mean no disrespect but in reading this post I kind of feel like you are behind the times here. There's no denying that Kimber went through some rough times. Particularly with respect to their design changes, primarily an external extractor. It took them way too long but they fixed this problem. They got a lot of bad press and unfortunately it still haunts them. There guns are no more poorly made than any of the major manufacturers and in many cases they are better. There will always be owners that got a poor example or in this case got a poor design, heck they sold hundreds of thousands of this design they're out there. I shoot Kimbers and several other premium manufacturers .45's. The Kimbers stack up well with any of them. Saying that Kimber is just getting that bad is just like saying America, Smith & Wesson, Ford, Apple or Boeing are just getting that bad. It's all relative and there is always a bone to be picked.Wolf vs Kimber. Who's the culprit.
I vote Kimber. Not because I like wolf, just because Kimber is getting that bad. It's a shame, they make some good looking guns.
Glad you weren't seriously hurt.. Welcome to THR! Nice pics btw.
Gearhead wrote: By the way, I'm betting on faulty ammo but firing out of battery isn't out of the question.
RaspberrySuprise wrote: I don't see how Midway could be negligent at least from a sensible point of view, they didn't make the ammo they just sold it to you and unless you have reason to believe that they reasonably knew that it was bad ammo going after them is just vindictiveness.
A defect may be the result of a design defect or a manufacturing defect. If your bad Wolf round was the result of a manufacturing defect, then it was unreasonably dangerous. Product liablity is usually a strict liability tort. This means that the defendant is liable even if it was not negligent in any way. Liability is imposed on any business that manufactures or distributes the product. That would include Midway. The theory is that if you profit from the sale of products, then you should be responsible if they are defective.
Wolf Ammo is not the best or even in the top half of ammo I will feed my firearms.
Stag Arms even warns ageinst using it in their AR's.
I'm thinking that if you are trying to accurately determining who is at fault that the last thing you want to be doing is taking the gun apart. Leave it as is so the "pros" can see what happened.I'm curious if the OP poster has tried to get the pistol apart.
Might need a big rubber mallet.
Evan wrote: I love this... nobody knows what actually happened but the lawyers are already working on the lawsuit.
Bogie, earlier in the thread, the OP poster said he could see the case that is still chambered. So I would say that no, there isn't a bullet lodged in the bore.
I'm curious if the OP poster has tried to get the pistol apart.
Might need a big rubber mallet.
Product liablity is usually a strict liability tort.
Unknown Sailor...Gun went back to Kimber and it wasn't right after repairs... earlier in the thread
Brighamr wrote: Did any of you read the entire thread?