Nothing like the original Colt, of course it wasn't designed by Colt, but by Browning.
A Browning would be neat.
The gun was designed by a team of engineers at Colt led by Browning, and with features dictated by US Army ordnance officials. It was no one individual's unique effort. And to be clear, "Browning Firearms" was not even started until a decade or two after the 1911 was finished.
Colt hired Browning to help with the process and direct it. They laid out the development capital, and spent years spending it and developing it. The design and development of the gun was on their dime, under their roof, and at their risk.
This does not imply that no one else can or should make a 100th tribute pistol. But an understanding of the facts of its development are worth keeping in mind. Under military and war time necessity, others have made copies of Colt's gun. But it was Colt's gun.
I have no objection to Kimber making a 100th tribute. But what disturbs me is their product is, from a "tribute" aspect, truly awful. It's finished in a silly way that is not in any way historically associated to the 1911, and it's features are just a modern Kimber and nothing reflective of the original 1911 design. It was a truly lazy effort to shamelessly cash in and not a serious "tribute."
The "buzz" is that Colt will be doing something very authentic and sensitive to the original design. I'd expect two levels - a fairly affordable gun along the lines of the O1911 and O1918 reproduction models, but with a more refined finish like the first few hundred military models and the commercial variants. There will then also likely be a higher-dollar "Presentation Grade"