Let it please be noted that CZ52Guy's use of the American flag as a backdrop violates the U.S. Flag Code, which prohibits draping the flag on anything but the casket of a veteran (and some others) and that under no circumstance, EVER, should any object be placed on top of the flag.
You can find the Flag Code and FAQ's on the American Legion website.
Red, white, and blue bunting can be used to convey the patriotic intent without disrespect to the flag. Similarly, the flag could be shown in the background, without being draped or having anything on it, without violating the Code.
As a veteran, I protest vehemently to this blatent disrespect of the flag. The fact that others burn the flag; wear it as clothing; fly tattered flags; or otherwise misuse the flag out of ignorance, arrogance, or a sense of entitlement makes absolutely no difference. That's why we have the Code.
http://suvcw.org/flag.htm
VG and I have had this discussion privately and publicly. While I am not a veteran, my career has been in its entirety at a defense contractor that supports the efforts of our troops.
I am married to the daughter of a veteran and career civil servant. Both of her brothers also served in our military...her eldest brother got me back into shooting sports about 18 months ago.
It is my bride of 17 years that thought the flag made a wonderful backdrop for my collection...an opportunity to show that I am a patriot...proud of my country, proud of my right within the 2nd Amendment to procure weapons of defense at my choosing.
Our view differs from VG's. When reading the flag code literally, the placing of an object upon it is listed as a prohibited act under respect for the flag, section 8, item g. It is also illegal to use the flag as part of an advertisement according to the letter of the law. VG's interpretation would invalidate the right to a flag on your t-shirt, your coffee mug, a decal on your automobile, or a bumper sticker. Political candidates nationwide could potentially alleviate the national debt if this code were literally interpreted in every instance.
I love the flag. I'm proud of my collection and I am proud of my country. I respect VG's right to take a position regarding adherence to the letter of the law. However, we all know that flags adorn hats, shirts, coffee mugs, lunch boxes, towels, and even warm up jackets for Olympic athletes. Reading the context within the link above, the Supreme Court has consistently struck down application of the Flag Code has a method to prohibit the freedom of speech. In the cases in question, individuals sought to flaunt the 1st to desecrate the flag.
I have no such malicious motives. I adore the flag. I adore our country. While I respect VG, and am grateful for the service that has been provided, I have to weigh this THR member's perspective against that of those I am closest to. I go shooting with my brother-in-law, both of us wearing hats adorned with the American flag (he gave me the hat). His 25+ years of service within our armed forces makes me respect his opinion regarding the appropriate interpretation of the Flag Code and its relevance vis-a-vis the 1st Amendment.
I have not deliberately sought to offend anyone. That a specific board member finds adoration of the flag in this manner offensive, and believes that a fundamentalist interpretation of the code must be followed is their right.
I however, have to follow my consience, and the guidance of those who are closest to me.
VG, I will not be engaging you in continued arguments regarding this topic. You do not live in a country where you are the sole arbiter of right and wrong. I have sought to engage you in respectful discourse on this topic. We will need to agree to disagree.
I apologize to others within this thread for the interruption...please continue...
Merry Christmas,
CZ52'