LCR 3-inch Review

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just got back from a long hike with the wife and I think I found the point of this little 5-shooter. Initially I was put off by a long-barreled small-frame revolver. Not because I don't think it's not cool or anything, simply I couldn't figure out the point of the gun.

I think I found it.

It's like a beefed-up kit gun ideal for hiking. - I was just out with my wife over the weekend for a 15-mile hike and I was carrying the LCRx in a shoulder holster. What's interesting is that I forgot I had it on me. Which is nuts, because I didn't forget about my clif bars, MRE's or water bottles at all.

The full review will be live tomorrow morning. I'll link you guys when it's up.

Thanks again for your help.
 
Drail - Initially I did not. But I just went outside and fired off a few boxes of various rounds and didn't have any issue with Federal FMJ, Federal Hydra Shok +P or Monarch 158 semi-jacketed wadcutters. - I emailed my contact at Blaser and Buffalo bore hoping to get some rounds to test, but no dice thus far.
 
OK, here's the skinny on the questions you guys asked.

As for the various additional chamberings, Ruger has basically said, "No comment" at this time.

The new Hogue Tamer grip will be available any time now on ShopRuger.com - expect to see it within the next week.

On the unfluted cylinder, it is hard to say. The removal of flutes will add weight to something Ruger is trying to keep light.

Review will be live in 30 mins.
 
Ok, this is pretty cool. Make it a 8-9 shot .22lr and I'm getting one. I'd also really like a 3" LCR (not X) with fixed sights, in .357 mag (even though I'd only run .38spl through it).
I suspect I'll like this grip a lot better. This is a great all around gun. IF you want small and light.

Since Ruger is finally doing one of the two things on my "wish list". Does that man they're working on the 5 shot GP100 in .44 mag, too?
 
Last edited:
Initially I thought I wanted the gun in .357, and if/when it comes out I'll probably buy one. But I think shooting nothing more than 38+p is the way to go due to the weight. Just too light to stand practicing with full house .357, even with the longer barrel. If it comes out in .22lr, I'll have two on order before they hit the dealers. Until then, I'll be happy with standard 38 specials. It's an amazing lightweight option that is a near perfect kit gun.
 
There is a statement in the article that the trigger of this new lcrx is "miles better" than the older lcr. Don't they have the same lockwork? Was the statement comparing double actions or double to single action?
 
oss117 - They do have the same internals. I believe the reason the trigger feels better in this model is the extra-large grip; it gives the shooter better leverage over the trigger, causing it to 'feel' lighter.

Ofcourse Ruger could have simply sent me a cherry-picked one, but given the way their factories run, it's pretty unlikely. They are so streamlined it would be really tough to pick one off the line that was 'better' than the rest.

Which reminds me, I've got a video tour that I recoreded during the summer of Ruger's NC plant that shows production of the American Rimfire rifle. Watching a billet become a receiver is too cool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top