Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

100 yd struggles

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by plodder, Apr 4, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. plodder

    plodder Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    501
    Location:
    Deep in a bunker behind the cheddar curtain
    .223/5.56 Stag Arms 24" 1 x 8" twist upper, Aero Precision lower with Timney trigger. Shooting 52 g. and 77 g. Match King bullets. Vortex Viper 4-16 scope, bipod front.

    Shooting from solid bench with bipod front, bag at rear.

    At 100 yds I am throwing wild 5 shot groups of 1.75" up to 2.5". Rarely can I shoot a 1.5" group or less.

    Yet, when I take it out to 200 yds I can shoot sub 2.5" groups. From this I would expect to be able to shoot much better at 100 yds.

    I know it is me, not the rifle. I typically keep the scope set to max. magnification for both 100 and 200 yds.

    Other than seeking professional help or giving up & taking up golf, what suggestions or advice can I obtain from you wise ones?
     
  2. Warp

    Warp Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,545
    Location:
    Georgia
    How many rounds in each group?

    Do you count every round in each group?

    Is there any trend or pattern to the groups you feel are too large? Stringing a certain way, being off on windage, off on elevation, just plain bigger groups in a shotgun pattern...?
     
  3. MutinousDoug

    MutinousDoug Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    873
    Location:
    Colorado
    Have you considered the effect of parallax on your sight picture? Its effect is much less evident at longer range and much more evident at higher magnification.
     
  4. Andrew Leigh

    Andrew Leigh Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,032
    Location:
    Johannesburg S.A.
    Group patterns are often diagnostic and correct diagnosis can get one to the truth somewhat quicker. Could you post pictures of your groups please.

    Have you shot better groups before with this rifle or is this a recent thing? Have you shot 1" groups or better with other rifles? Please I am not being rude but just trying to also understand your level of skill and experience.

    Would love to see the group patterns.
     
  5. Orkan

    Orkan Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Messages:
    308
    Location:
    South Dakota
    You could try to get off the bench with that bipod. If you are going to be on a bench, you'll get your best results shooting off a pack or some sandbags.

    Your position needs to be double good when shooting a semi-auto. You have several recoil impulses to deal with, that don't exist when firing a bolt gun. You have the first recoil to the rear which is when the charge is ignited and the bullet starts its journey down the barrel, then another to the rear when the buffer hits the rear of the buffer tube, then one impulse forward when the BCG and buffer slap back into battery.

    If your crosshair is leaving the POA during recoil, then you need to address your natural point of aim (NPA) to ensure you aren't muscling the rifle. Break the shot on your natural respiratory pause, maintain enough pressure on the trigger to keep it to the rear until the recoil impulse is over. At that point, release the trigger enough to allow the disconnector to let go of the hammer. You'll hear a distinctive "click" inside your lower. Then you can start your cycle for the next shot.

    Let the shot happen. It wants to happen, so there's no need to force it. Just relax, and get out of its way. :)
     
  6. Edarnold

    Edarnold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2012
    Messages:
    640
    Location:
    Northern Illinois
    Really sounds like parallax effect at the shorter range. Next time out set the rifle up at 100yds. and with no contact, move your head back and forth and see if the crosshairs stay steady.
     
  7. Orkan

    Orkan Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Messages:
    308
    Location:
    South Dakota
    Tell me more about this ammo. Reloads? Factory?

    If reloads, how did you go about your load development?
    If factory, have you tried a few different brands?
     
  8. TBH

    TBH Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    202
    Location:
    Vermont
    For me to get groups with three of my ARs (sold one) they all needed to be held firm and consistently. Try pulling the stock in a little tighter and use your off hand to put a little downward pressure on the hand guard to keep the bipod from jumping too much. I assume the barrel is free floating.
    Last, I will align the redicule on the target, then adjust my body to fit the rifle. That prevents torquing the rifle to the target.
     
  9. Pete D.

    Pete D. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,122
    Sights

    What happens.....what kind of groups do you get shooting without the scope, shooting iron sights? (Do you have irons for that upper?)
    Pete.
     
  10. plodder

    plodder Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    501
    Location:
    Deep in a bunker behind the cheddar curtain
    Warp:
    Attached are a couple of photos to give the idea.

    I'd say my spreads are "shotgunning" but in reflecting upon some groups, it appears I am more errantly high than low. Although I can usually call my "fliers" I am not happy with the groups I think I have shot in a consistent manner.

    I use handloads and although I use a Dillon 650, I have individually weighed powder, seated bullets and measured C.O.A.L. so that I am sure I am using as absolutely consistent rounds as possible.

    All ideas appreciated!
     

    Attached Files:

  11. ironworkerwill

    ironworkerwill Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2013
    Messages:
    1,839
    Location:
    AUabama- WE FEAR NO WEEVIL
    looks like a parallax issue. If you put that rifle on a steady rest and look through the scope while moving your head around you'll likely see the crosshairs moving slightly. 1.5 moa should = 3'' at 200 yds. Most scopes should be parallax free at 100yds. Try shooting 120yds and see if the groups make more sense.
     
  12. plodder

    plodder Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    501
    Location:
    Deep in a bunker behind the cheddar curtain
    I would not claim to be a sharpshooter or even a marksman, but with bolt action rifles I am more accurate and consistent.
    I do have another AR 15 (Bushmaster, 20" 1 x 9" with Nikon BDC) and results with it are similar to the Stag (reasonable accuracy at 200 yds, unacceptable at 100 yds). The trigger is like a bear trap on the Bushy, so I always just blamed it on that. But there is no excuse on the Stag.
     
  13. The_Armed_Therapist

    The_Armed_Therapist Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,138
    Location:
    Obsession, Guntopia, USA
    The good news is that 2.5" groups at 100 yards doesn't matter. That'll be fatal to anything you try to make dead. If accuracy improves beyond that, that's what's important--that's where stricter accuracy counts.
     
  14. ironworkerwill

    ironworkerwill Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2013
    Messages:
    1,839
    Location:
    AUabama- WE FEAR NO WEEVIL
    Stag makes a great AR. I used mixed factory ammo and got groups under 1.5 moa with each brand.
    If you say you shoot 1.25 moa at 200yds then I do not suspect markmanship. And I'm thinking the Stag is good to go as well.
     
  15. loose noose

    loose noose Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,793
    Location:
    Southern Nevada
    Plodder, It's parralax, You're taking shots at a much higher magnification at 100 yards whereas you think you have a good sight picture, so when you squeeze the trigger you think you were dead on. Now at 200 yards the magnification is much less therefore you must concentrate more before you squeeze off that next round and you have a much better group. Remember the old Marine adage "BRASS" or Breathe, Relax, Aim, Slack, Squeeze. At 100 yards I would not go beyond 4X, out to 200 yards 6-7X. Does that make sense?
     
  16. plodder

    plodder Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    501
    Location:
    Deep in a bunker behind the cheddar curtain
    It's sure worth a try. I like the high magnification in order to accomodate my aging eyesight. I thought a higher end piece of glass like the Vortex might reduce or eliminate the effects of parralax (although I admit to not being as educated on the finer points of optics as I should be). Next range session I will dial down the magnification and try to relax.

    Thanks again all for the advice. It's worth every penny I have paid for it:)
     
  17. X-Rap

    X-Rap Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,651
    Turn the scope down to 4x and loose the bipod. I bet you see an improvement.
     
  18. MtnCreek

    MtnCreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    3,974
    Location:
    West GA
    Is you scope fixed or adjustable parallax? If adjustable, it gives you the means to correct parallax.
     
  19. plodder

    plodder Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    501
    Location:
    Deep in a bunker behind the cheddar curtain
    Geez!, now I'm going to have to actually read the manual that came with the Vortex:eek:
     
  20. MtnCreek

    MtnCreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    3,974
    Location:
    West GA
    Scopes and Reloading are the only two times you can read the manual and still keep your man-card. :)
     
  21. Skylerbone

    Skylerbone Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,379
    Could be parallax or the bullet itself. Given that you've chosen the heavy for caliber 77gr., it may require a bit more distance to stabilize.

    I'd suggest checking your Vortex for a side focus adjustment knob as I believe all their 4-16X Vipers include one and load some 69gr. SMKs as a lighter alternative for midrange distances.
     
  22. Joshua M. Smith

    Joshua M. Smith Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,055
    Location:
    Wabash IN
    Hello,

    I am seeing shooter error in NPOA.

    Are you shooting with your breath all the way out? At natural respiratory pause?

    Close your eyes, aim with your eyes closed. Now open them. Are you aiming where you thought you were? Looks like you're muscling the rifle over onto target.

    I have a nice target/varmint style .22LR that I was trying to shoot sub-MOA at 100 yards with. I had the same problems I states above, and my groups looked exactly the same as yours. I consulted some shooters, a former sniper or two among them, and all gave the same basic advice I just passed along. It helped me get sub-MOA with a .22LR at that range. I hope it helps you, too!

    Regards,

    Josh
     
  23. TheCracker

    TheCracker Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    482
    Location:
    East Texas
    That's exactly what I was thinking when I was reading the post!

    I think thinks a big possibility esp with the situation described
     
  24. wingman

    wingman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,185
    Location:
    texas
    My guess the issue is the bipod, I'm certain the vortex has an AO. i use my Stag with a Weaver 5-20x44, set on 20 power,normal groups are .650-.800 with reloads. I use a steel adjustable front rest never did well with a bipod.
     
  25. esheato

    esheato Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,784
    Location:
    NoVa
    For me, I'm seeing a lack of attention to the fundamentals in addition to a possible problem with parallax. Sincerely, no offense intended on my part. The shot one misses is always the easiest because you quit trying.

    Like that last bird on a perfect round of skeet...or the fifth shot on a perfect group that is a blatant shank. You feel like it's a "gimme" and don't apply the same amount of focus and concentration that you did on the other "more difficult" shots. The only shot that matters is the one that you're currently firing. IMHO, magnification is not the issue here. BR shooters routinely shoot on 40x+ magnification at 100 yards. It doesn't seem to hinder their performance in the least.

    If you reduce the magnification, all you are doing is lowering your standards. Instead of saying, "that's a crap group for 20x scope" you will say, "that's not bad for 4x at 100 yards."

    Remove all those variables to start with and get a good baseline. Then add in parallax, varying bullet weights, etc, etc. You'll learn about you and the rifle at the same time. Change one thing at a time, whittling down the issues until you work them all out.

    Obviously set the parallax, get a solid rest (front and rear), relax, and fire at the same point in your breathing. Rifle is all about consistency.

    Lastly, ensure that you shoot an appropriate bullet weight for your barrel, of which you are currently doing. You should be able to shoot up to around an 80 grain bullet.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2013
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page