125 gr cast for deer

So commercial hard cast, yeah they'll probably go straight through a deer/person and won't flatten out much unless they hit thick bone. Unless you increase velocity a good bit.
Yeah I plan on speeding it up some. Depends on the 50 yards accuracy.
 
Because,I have lot of bullet.
I just don't think that's a good way to choose a hunting load.

You're already talking about having to do some load development so instead of doing it with those bullets, buy a small batch of decent .357 hunting bullets with a good reputation for accuracy in 686 revolvers and work up a load. Even with sight-in and some familiarization shots every year, most people don't shoot a lot of deer-hunting ammo so how much you have really shouldn't be a factor in your choice.

What you're currently talking about is pretty much the equivalent of hunting deer with 9mm FMJ. It can certainly be done, but it's not something that's going to garner much support.
 
I'm planning on using 125 gr cast for deer at 50 yards max. Maybe 1200 fps. Do you think it's doable..thanks
Doable? Yes, but just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. I would consider a 158 gr JSP or XTP-HP as the bare minimum for 50 yard deer from my 6” GP-100 at around 1350 FPS. Although a 170 to 180 gr cast bullet might work just as well.
 
Interesting consideration, ham stringing one's hunting capability with an anemic (for hunting deer) caliber and then doubling down on non-expanding bullets.

In some states all you can use are straight wall cartridges for deer.

BULLY! (historic T.R. positive exclamation, since we are talking hunting)

Did you know that many of those states don't just stipulate straight-walled, but straight-walled centerfire cartridges? Did you know that in some states that allow straight walled cartridges (and bottleneck in some cases) also have an energy stipulation that the OP would not meet with his little .38. When stipulated, it is usually muzzle energy, but in some states, the stipulation of energy is at distance, such as Utah that requires the energy at 100 yards to be 500 ft lbs or more that cannot be delivered by a non-expanding bullet. A 1200 fps 125 gr. .38 caliber straight-walled cartridge producing 400 ft lbs at the muzzle is well under that criterion and non-expanding bullets would be a no-go as well. In Nebraska, it is 400 ft lbs at 50 yards, close, but no cigar. Did you know in some states, the straight-walled cartridge must be no smaller than .357?

I do love me some hunting trivia, but it is pretty pointless especially due to the randomness of the information as applied to this situation and so this probably isn't the thread for it. Seriously, I am not sure why you quoted me previously since I wasn't commenting on legality. I never assumed or implied the OP was doing anything illegal. If I thoguht the OP was illegal, I would have said as much. I would not want a fellow member accidentally making a legal mistake that could be costly.

However, if you really want to get into the sticks, start a thread on airgun hunting requirements by state. Then we can have some real fun!
 
I just don't think that's a good way to choose a hunting load.

Its not but “because I want to” has driven many purchases and use of, less than ideal hunting gear and ammunition.

I do hunt with cast bullets though but there is a pretty big energy difference between a 125 vs going 1200 fps and a 405 going the same speed, almost 900 ft/lbs difference Between the two.
 
Its not but “because I want to” has driven many purchases and use of, less than ideal hunting gear and ammunition.
No doubt. I would say that there are also a number of other ways people have used to justify choosing less than ideal hunting ammunition.
I do hunt with cast bullets though but there is a pretty big energy difference between a 125 vs going 1200 fps and a 405 going the same speed, almost 900 ft/lbs difference Between the two.
As well as the fact that the 405 grainer is .458" instead of .357"!
 
Apologies if I missed it, but what's the bullet shape in question?

If it's a round nose or truncated cone, I wouldn't consider it and would look for a different bullet. If it's a semi wadcutter, than it might work okay.

I think where you would be most likely to run into a problem is if you hit a large bone. A heavier bullet would typically break the bone and continue on (depending on how heavy for the caliber). The light bullet would typically break the bone, but get stopped quickly.

If you do end up giving it a try, be sure to take some photos of how the bullet performed, how it penetrated, etc.

Good luck,
Mike
 
I would think it would be adequate on the tiny Texas whitetails if put in the right place all though I doubt it will be a DRT thing. I have only seen one deer, a smaller mulie but still larger than the the whitetails, shot with a lead projectile. It was with a 50 caliber round ball from a muzzle loader at about 35 yards. It drilled a 1/2" hole through a rib and even being pure lead showed no expansion or flattening at all. Luckily the deer just stood in place for a time and then fell over. On a mule deer I wouldn't even consider what you are asking. Unless a head shot it would probably be a lost deer.
 
I guess if you wouldn’t hesitate to shoot one with a 9mm handgun shooting +P 124 gr non expanding bullets, then that nearly identical bullet/speed combo out of your revolver will work. (1200 fps w/125 gr .358 bullet is roughly 420 fpe)

Put the shot in the brain and you’ll fill that tag right there. Anywhere else and you probably will be tracking for a bit.

Good luck :thumbup:
My dogs a good tracker.lol
 
If you don’t hit him square in the bean, then your dog’s talents will come in handy! :D

My dog is a pointer and loves to sniff critters out, but she is a lousy tracker. 😞

Good luck this season, let us know how it goes. :thumbup:

Stay safe.
 
Can't use dogs to track deer in Michigan. So we just drop them where they stand, much easier.
 
Four deer killed on opening day in our group of five. Two heart lung shots, one head, and one neck shot. The neck shot was with a 243, the other ones were 450 bushmasters. They all went down where they were shot. The deer ranged from 150 to 200 pounds.
 
Back
Top