1851 L&R

Status
Not open for further replies.
My Dance and brothers, made by Pietta and purchased last month from EMF has a plain cylinder an the original had. I’m guessing this is because the CSA didn’t care about how they looked(no parsley, just meat and potatoes), they just wanted a pistol as fast as they could get there hands on them. I like guns that have a cool story and history behind them. My next gun purchase will be a Grizwald(unless I can find a .50 Dragoon) , it has something me great history behind it.
 
My Dance and brothers, made by Pietta and purchased last month from EMF has a plain cylinder an the original had. I’m guessing this is because the CSA didn’t care about how they looked(no parsley, just meat and potatoes), they just wanted a pistol as fast as they could get there hands on them. I like guns that have a cool story and history behind them.

Cylinder rollmark engraving was Colt's trademark. None of the Confederate copies had engraved cylinders because it was cheaper to produce them without. The same goes for the part round/part octagon barrels vs. the full octagon barrels, although a few Dance .36 and Augusta Machine Works .36 barrels were full octagon.

The current Pietta J.H. Dance And Brothers .44 is not close to being historically correct. Pietta uses a Navy .36 frame that has had the entire water table lowered to accommodate the larger diameter .44 cylinder which is not rebated. The original Dance .44 was based upon a frame that was about midway between the Navy .36 frame and the Dragoon frame. (Reference: Dance & Brothers, Gary Wiggins, 1986.)

Pietta Dance .44 cylinder and Pietta 1851 Navy .36 cylinder:

Pietta-Dance-44-Cyl.jpg

My next gun purchase will be a Grizwald (unless I can find a .50 Dragoon), it has something me great history behind it.

The Griswold & Gunnison .36 revolver was produced in more numbers (3600+) than all of the other Confederate revolver producers combined concerning the 1851 Navy "copies". The only modern repro source is Pietta.

My Pietta G&G .36 with my Pietta Rigdon & Ansley .36 (12-stop-slot cylinder; parts gun):

Pietta-Rigdon-Ansley-Pietta-G-G-002.jpg

Regards,

Jim
 
Got this revolver yesterday. Looks good and came quick. I'm glad on this one the grips don't have the dark red-orange lacquer as my other new production Ubertis have. I stuck a '58 grip in the corner for comparison.

Hope to get out tomorrow and put some rounds through it. Only have a .375 mold and Hdy. balls of the same size, hopefully they'll work until I can get a .380 ball mold.

Pics always make a thread better...

rps20200828_071753.jpg
 
When you see a mainspring thats questionable would you normally replace it immediately or shoot it until it fails?

This revolver has one with a spot that is suspect, this is the new '51 model that I started this thread for...

The reason I ask is because I just had a '58 mainspring break a few weeks back. That particular Uberti is a 2018 model with probably 400-ish rounds through it. It developed a 1/4" crack exactly where I thought it would, on a nick in the edge. I see one similar on this one. To be fair the replacement mainsprings I've ordered to keep as spares have been nice and smooth, the ones that come in it just don't seem as nicely finished as the replacements.

rps20200828_102324.jpg
 
When you see a mainspring thats questionable would you normally replace it immediately or shoot it until it fails?

Since you have other guns, keep it until it fails unless you really want to swap it out sooner to gain another benefit.
How else will you be able to test it's longevity?
 
Got this revolver yesterday. Looks good and came quick. I'm glad on this one the grips don't have the dark red-orange lacquer as my other new production Ubertis have. I stuck a '58 grip in the corner for comparison.

Hope to get out tomorrow and put some rounds through it. Only have a .375 mold and Hdy. balls of the same size, hopefully they'll work until I can get a .380 ball mold.

Pics always make a thread better...

View attachment 938619
That’s a beauty!
 
Good points.

I'll at least shoot it before modifying anything. Thanks for the suggestions.

I beagled a Lee mold and they're dropping around .378-379 so I'll take these and the factory 375s and see what happens!
 
Got this revolver yesterday. Looks good and came quick. I'm glad on this one the grips don't have the dark red-orange lacquer as my other new production Ubertis have. I stuck a '58 grip in the corner for comparison.

It seems all Uberti wood is red to some extent or another. I have an Uberti WH Dragoon that has the same characteristics, but if you go to their USA website, you won't find many.

Early stock photo:

Uberti-Whitneyville-Dragoon001a.jpg

Mine:

Uberti-Whitneyville-Dragoon002a.jpg


Pics always make a thread better...

You betcha!

Regards,

Jim
 
The larger 378-ish ball shot better than the factory Hornady 375's.

Here's a side by side 20 yard target versus my best shooting '58. In typical fashion off hand I pull one shot to make it just an average group!

That said, this '51 has potential.

I'm wondering if I've been missing out by just shooting these 44 cals!

View attachment 938955
 

Attachments

  • rps20200829_154024.jpg
    rps20200829_154024.jpg
    51.3 KB · Views: 21
Nice shooting! I almost never shoot what the good Colonel Cooper called minor calibers... they are fun though if the pistol is accurate and it seems like you have a couple there!
 
Yeah just a partial ring on these swaged balls.

I've read the Pietta versions of 36's have smaller chamber diameters and do better with the 375s.
 
My experience differs. Of my several Pietta .36's all do better with .380. Those range from '96 to 2017. Each will print tighter groups with the larger ball.
 
In regards to the main spring mentioned above, take a small fine grit stone and blend in the spot in your photo, it should be ok once any sharp edges have been rounded and polished, all the polishing marks should run parallel to the length to eliminate stress risers. Hope this helps.
 
Nice one Jim, another reason to keep a well stocked parts drawer 1

I am a Pietta 1851 Navy .36 "parts changer" insofar as I want to create Confederate replicas using Pietta off the shelf parts. I have done that with an Augusta Machine Works and a Columbus Firearms Manufacturing Company.

My Pietta L&R (which Pietta has never marketed):

View attachment 937872


Just changing parts using a Pietta 1851 Navy .36 as a base donor using a Pietta G&G part round/part octagon barrel/ plain cylinder and better wood.

Regards,

Jim
 
Mark from Erasgonebulletmolds just got back to me. He said he has a pending trade but if it doesn’t go through he will let me know. I was trying to do some research on the gun but there isn’t a lot of info out there about them. They must be pretty rare
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top