MICHAEL T
Member
That's what I keep wondering! Why, in this modern day is it acceptable - even expected - that a certain product will often NOT function reliably unless the buyer goes through a ritual of breaking in, troubleshooting and "tuning" to get the bloody thing to work??!!
If the only lower priced models exhibited these traits as an acceptable tradeoff allowing DIY gun guy to save a few bucks by doing the finishing work himself and the higher priced offerings delivered "tuned" flawless shooters out of the box, I would understand. But apparently - they are all fussy and finicky devices making buying one a roll of the dice - regardless of what you buy and how much you pay, it is possible or likely that some level of post-purchase gunsmithing (deburring, new springs, tuned mags, etc, etc.....) may be required to make it functional. WHY IS THIS OK???
Maybe if all these companys made the pistol to the orginal specs. Their wouldn't be all these troubles But no they want tighter chamber or tighter that or this and their goes the relieably . The 1911 was known for .They were combat pistols and operated under all kinds of weather and conditions Only since they begain trying to make target pistols or game guns have all these troubles began Military 1911 as issued went to war no break in and worked My 41 and 43 both shot well and have never been a problem But their not target guns.
When people stop trying to make the 1911 a target pistol and return to its correct specs They will once again be relieable. Colt seems to work the best from box. But people say it rattles Well gee it also works and the extractor is where browning wanted it