1986 FBI Miami Shootout?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't bring pistols to a rifle fight .

Absolutely. The detailed findings showed that the vast majority of hits on the agents were done by one suspect with a mini-14. They had only short guns.

How the FBI decided based on this that they needed a bigger cartridge instead is beyond me.
 
At the time of the shootout I was a LEO (State Parole Officer) working just a few miles from the action. Cops were covering the area in moments so we were gettijng all sorts of feedback from the scene. As I understand it, one of the agents killed was a crack shot and had won some competitions for his skill. He was unable to even see his sights since the felony car stop had knocked his eyeglasses to the floorboards of the vehicle. I guess I'd learn about cable earpieces or croakies! Imagine knowing you had the skill to stop the action but having to wait literally in a fog to get killed. One of the survivors later became an assistant federal prosecutor and he became an ardent supporter of strict "gun control." I forget his name but it was NOT the hero of the day that killed the perps: Mireles.
 
Actually, Mirelles was armed with a six shot S&W. I think it was a Model 13 with a three or four inch barrel. And as has been said before, a 9mm fmj ball round would have penetrated better. That doesn't mean the outcome would have been any different. Platt took a NON-SURVIVABLE wound early in the fight before he killed anybody. As far as getting shotguns into the fight early, yes and no. Oneill left the shotgun in his car so he could immediately engage Matix. He fired six rounds from his two inch 19 and effectively put Matix out of action; didn't terminate him but Matix didn't factor in the fight after that. Mireles did exit with the shotgun and immediately came under fire and was severely wounded by Platt with the 223. What IS inexcusable are two agents LOSING their primary weapons BEFORE even getting into the fight! That is the ONLY part of this fight that I'll second guess.
 
As I understand it, one of the agents killed was a crack shot and had won some competitions for his skill. He was unable to even see his sights since the felony car stop had knocked his eyeglasses to the floorboards of the vehicle. I guess I'd learn about cable earpieces or croakies!

Oh if only I'd remembered this in the days of PLusP. I remember this guy was all over the AOL gun board and he hated these damn new kids who had to wear a rubberband around their head to keep their cool sunglasses on.
 
I don't know, after reading the accounts, it seems like the although the agents tactics could have been better, they did OK given that they started off "behind the 8 ball". Both perps were hit several times, with fatal results in one case and unconscious in the other right at the onset but then things deteriorated. Mostly in that Platt "refused to die". Had to be stressful on the agents to see a perp who had been hit multiple times, spraying blood, useless arm etc refuse to go down and keep fighting, all while the agents wer running out of ammo/cover. It seems that they did better shooting than some of the reports that read where dozens of shots are fired and the perps are barely wounded. Tough position to be in, for the agents.
 
That is the ONLY part of this fight that I'll second guess.

You're being a little too generous my friend. I'll second guess the whole damn thing. The SAC royally screwed the pooch by making a horrible tactical decision. Why? FBI hubris. They wanted all the glory for the Bureau and weren't about to call Miami/Dade police and SWAT for help even though all the common sense in the world would tell you that going up against heavily armed killers armed only with handguns was really, really dumb. Well, they got their glory and two good FBI men lost their lives in the process. :mad:
 
Last edited:
Interesting.

Part 1b of the report has newspaper clippings of the shooting and articles on the perps.

of course, the articles were peppered with references to "automatic weapons," "militia types" and "target shooters." the 2 perps apparently mugged and shot a target shooter in a rock-pit range. :scrutiny:
 
There are no magic bullets......

Everyone in this thread, step back, take a deep breath and repeat after me:

"There are no magic bullets."

Again;

"There are no magic bullets."

Again;

"There are no magic bullets."

Once more, with feeling this time;

"There are no magic bullets."

If I live to be 112 I'll never understand the American gun culture's fixation with caliber and stopping power. Stopping power is that mythical factor that makes a person's personal favorite weapon/caliber combination the one true defensive death ray that instantly smites anyone unfortunate enough to be struck by it instantly and irrevocably incapacitated.

The truth is, that unless you are willing to lug around a 90mm recoilless rifle, you don't have stopping power in your holster. You don't have stopping power under your bed, in the closet or wherever you keep your long gun either. Nothing you can comfortably hand carry will instantly stop everyone you shoot, every time, under every conceivable condition. Nothing, not .30 M2 ball, not 7.62x51, not 5.56x45, not 7.62x39, not .44 magnum, not .357 magnum, not .45ACP, not .9mm, they have all failed to stop enough times that we should be smart enough to realize we can't count on any of them. Accept that fact and your life will be much easier. Forget caliber, forget action type, get out of the medieval mindset that you are somehow able to choose a personal weapon, have it blessed by the Bishop, King, village wise man or a representative of whatever deity you choose and it will be effective in every situation. Real life isn't like that. Step from the dark ages into the light.

In the stark daylight of reality, any weapon that is reliable, in any caliber .38 special or bigger, is adequate for self defense and to slay any human goblins you might encounter. The issues we should be discussing about the FBI Miami Shootout is not if the 115 grain Silver Tip in Agent Dove's S&W automatic was too anemic to do the job, for crying out loud a .30 caliber center fire rifle round could have deflected off the bone in Platt's arm and failed to be a killing shot, you just can't predict things like that.

There is nothing relative to the firearms and ammunition to be learned from the Miami shootout. The agents had weapons and ammunition that were capable of killing the bad guys.

What the agents didn't have was adequate training, or maybe it was inadequate mindset.

#1. They set out to apprehend two felons who they knew to be very violent armed with standard weapons, even though they knew Platt and Matix were armed with long guns and didn't hesitate to use them. Was it hubris? Was it the old; "It can't happen to me" attitude?

#2. They failed set up a stop where they confronted Platt and Matix with overwhelming force. Again, was it hubris? Was it, "we're the FBI and they will not dare fight"?

Between the local FBI field office and local law enforcement, they had more then sufficient assets to take these two down in a safer way. There is a lot to learn from that fight. But the only lesson about weapons and ammunition worth learning is that if you know the bad guys have long guns, bring your own to the fight. The lesson I took from it was to bring a long gun anytime I expected a fight. The rest of the stuff about caliber and bullet selection is meaningless. Nice trivia for the unwashed masses who read the slick paper gun magazines, but absolutely useless to anyone who want to learn how to win a similar encounter.

Jeff
 
"The SAC royally screwed the pooch by making a horrible tactical decision. Why? FBI hubris."

That may be true. I just said I wouldn't second guess that part of it. Call me generous.
 
"How the FBI decided based on this that they needed a bigger cartridge instead is beyond me."

Because they didn't want to blame the officers who made the tactical decisions. They needed to blame something that couldn't speak up. I mean, the 9mm has been killing stuff when properly applied since 1908. How much proof do you need?
 
Another important thing to note was agent Miereles's ferocity and dedication to taking the two perpetrators out; his forearm was blown open somewhat early in the fight by one of Platt's .223 rounds, which means when he was operating the shotgun, or his service revolver that fired the killing shots, he was probably only using his uninjured arm.
 
I agree with Jeff White. Practice with what you trust. And keep practicing.
 
IMHO the Fed screwed the pooch on this one from the get/go.......Not only was their surveillance so bad they got "made" by the perps, they did their take down in a residential area without proper backup. IOW they went up against perps with a known heavy weapons MO with pistols....... >MW
 
The 86 FBI shoot out is most probably the most studied shootout since the OK Corral. This incident probably changed or made more "policy" than any other incident. I can't remember how many different classes or video tapes I've seen during re-trainers.

Without rehashing the entire incident I'll make some of the points that have stuck out to me.

1 There is no such thing as a 1 shot stop with a handgun. The 9mm actually preformed as designed. Some people just die hard. Pratt had 2 lethal hits and continued to fight. They ain't dead till the coroner said so.

2 Rifles always outclass pistols. We are still seeing this. The Hollywood bank robbery, etc. There are just to many to list.

3 There is a major difference between "investigators" and street cops. Most FBI are accountants or lawyers. They do very little street work. Also in the 80's ramming a car you were pursuing was an accepted practice. But doing it side by side is Hollywood. To make a good stop it has to be a T bone or a head on.

4 If your gun is not in your had it should be in your holster. No laying on the seat next to you, or under your leg etc.

5 If you have to wear glasses get those that will stay on your face. No matter how ugly they are. You can change to the pretty ones for the press shots later. :eek:

6 ALWAYS carry a back up!!! 3 isn't a bad number.:) ALWAYS carry 1 more reload than you think you will need.

7 If it isn't on your belt or person, or in your hand at the time of the fight it don't count. Most of the FBI had shotguns in there trunks, a couple had MP5's. But those Agents didn't make it to the fight.

Some notes of fact.
The FBI or any federal agency "usually" don't have direct radio contact with the local PD. They call their office who then land lines to the local PD. It was still that way in 2001 when I retired.

I'm not a big FBI fan, but till you have had to return fire while being shot at, especially when they have a rifle and you just a handgun, don't talk. You just don't know. Most LEO never have to shoot in the line of duty. If I remember correctly none of those agents had ever puled a trigger in anger. Pratt and his partner had killed several prior to that shootout. It's a steep learning curve. Remember everyone of them fought. They may have died, but they stayed and fought. You can't ask for more.
 
.


.

.


Constantine-p89 said:
I have the movie and it tells a sad story of the two FBI agents that died that day…If you dont own the movie I would recomend you try to find it, it's called: In The Line Of Duty The FBI Murders.
You're kidding, right?

That "movie," actually an NBC teleflick, was an abominable work of fiction, and needs to be viewed, if one has the stomach for it, with a v-e-r-y critical eye.

If there's any one "movie" upon which to rely, it's the FBI's own recreation and debriefing of the surviving agents, some of whom are no longer with us: it's called "Firefight," and even it is somewhat factually skewed (understandably).

XD-40 Shooter said:
…none of the agents had RIFLE rated vest's, I believe two or three of them were wearing PISTOL rated vest's. The .223 rounds punched right through them.
Whatever vests were there, were not even being fully worn. Nor do I believe that and on Michael Platt's rounds struck, much less perforated whatever vests had been hastily thrown on.

perpster said:
IIRC, the gunfight finally ended when Moralez (sp) used a 5-shot Chief revolver to kill Platt at less than 7 yds.
You don't RC in the slightest. But don't feel like the Long Ranger, neither does "dodging230grainers." (For his part, the recollections of "macadore" are far more accurate.)

Wolfgang2K said:
The 86 FBI shoot out is most probably the most studied shootout since the OK Corral. This incident probably changed or made more "policy" than any other incident.
Now why does that sound familiar?

I'm please that some here recognize the skill and dedication and, thank you, Jeff Cooper!, mindset that Matix and especially Platt brought to the encounter. They not only had military training… MP, Ranger, 101st Airborne… but of their own volition they practiced regularly and extensively. Less than two weeks before the firefight in Kendell, they'd purchased 5k rounds of .223 Remington, and since none of it was ever recovered from either of their homes or their "stash garage," the assumption has always been that they burned it off shooting in the Everglades, their favorite practice range (and killing ground when they ran across other target shooters and plinkers).

And since others here have referenced the heavily-televised-in-real-time 1997 North Hollywood back take-down, I'd note that had either of those two goofs, Phillips or Matasereanu, has any of the training that Platt and Matix gained in the military, and spent half as much time as the Florida pair did practicing instead of watching the bank robbery scene in Michael Mann's Heat, a lot of LAPD would've died that day!

Dodson's fussing about Ayoob's original article is an intellectual dishonest exercise in sucking up to Fackler and the IWBA, which organization, as Shawn subsequently learned to his detriment, routinely ate its own. My biggest problem with Mas' excellent narrative, based on what was known at the time he wrote it, was that he misspelled SA Gil Orrantia's name throughout… but then so did another high profile author who has posted in this very thread.

For my part, I defer to a raw two-hour vidoetaped debriefing by lead crime scene investigator Sgt. David Rivers and Dr. Anderson's excruciatingly detailed forensic recreation of the event… it was sufficiently well-done that the Metro-Dade ME signed off on a revision to his own 1986 report.

FWIW: Mas' long-overdue response to Dodson may be read here.
 
Questions I've always wondered about:
(1.) Were the unmarked cars that the FBI agents were driving properly set up as police cars (emergency lights & siren, etc.) or just generic cars from the Federal motor pool? Could they have conducted a proper "high risk" traffic stop, or did they feel they had to effect the stop by ramming the suspect vehicle?
(2.) Did the FBI agents have the ability to "go direct" with the local police on the radio? (Around here, the FBI, Secret Service & ATF agents have mobile radios with the VHF frequencies that the Sheriff's Dept & many suburban agencies operate on). Of course, the incident happened so quickly that the arrival of uniformed officers may or may not have helped much.
(3.) IIRC at least a couple of the FBI agents had shotguns available, in hard cases in the back seat. Pulling a long gun out of the rack in a patrol car is lots quicker than pulling a long gun out of a case in the back seat. This may just have been a situation better handled by the "regular" police.

At least the FBI took this incident to heart and implemented changes in their equipment and procedures and training.

(We used to show the FBI produced movie "Firefight" first thing on the first morning of the firearms training week when I taught at the local regional police academy [1988-1998] During that time, we had two recruits self eliminate THAT DAY because the movie made them realize that they didn't know what they were getting into . . . normally the firearms training block (40 hrs, about 1000 rounds) was in the sixth week of the academy)
 
if there is an online video re-enactment somehwere (youtube?) that would be appreciated.

the diagrams in the fbi report are a little fuzzy for my lousy eyesight.
 
Quote:
The BG’s were prior military (MPs)

Ironic that they were former LE personnel.

Some of the most sucessful career criminals are former LEO and far too many had military training.

PS
As Clint Eastwood said in "A Fist Full of Dollars",
"Everthing else being equal the man with a rifle will always beat the man with a pistol".
The secret is never give the other guy an even break much less an advantge.
 
Have enough ammo on the ready

Platt and Maddox were both former Army airborne MP's. Platt had no problem shooting people, it could be said he liked it. Platt and Maddox bailed out shooting (admittedly Platt more than Maddox), quickly gained fire superiority, and never surrendered it. I think the FBI report at the time said Platt fired a minimum of 140 rounds.

140 rounds is a firestorm. If he had only 1 or 2 30 round mags the fight likely would have gone differently.

I've seen lots of threads where people insist if 5 or 6 rounds of (insert your favorite caliber) doesn't solve the problem you shouldn't have been there in the 1st place. Good grief. I've never been able to get my mind around this. 6 rounds is nothing.

Extra mags, BUG, long-guns close by. I've been in a few sticky situations that required fast action (no firearms involved). When the adrenaline is pumping, things just don't always work like the rest of the time. At reaction speed your sleeve can snag on something that normally wouldn't cause a problem and send your handgun flying, or whatever random chaotic thing might happen. Having a second chance (BUG, reloads, etc) is a real luxury.

I'm not an expert in anything. If I'm out of line just tell me, but explain why.
 
.

.

.


Jeff22 said:
Questions I've always wondered about:
(1.) Were the unmarked cars that the FBI agents were driving properly set up as police cars (emergency lights & siren, etc.) or just generic cars from the Federal motor pool? Could they have conducted a proper "high risk" traffic stop, or did they feel they had to effect the stop by ramming the suspect vehicle?
(2.) Did the FBI agents have the ability to "go direct" with the local police on the radio? (Around here, the FBI, Secret Service & ATF agents have mobile radios with the VHF frequencies that the Sheriff's Dept & many suburban agencies operate on). Of course, the incident happened so quickly that the arrival of uniformed officers may or may not have helped much.
(3.) IIRC at least a couple of the FBI agents had shotguns available, in hard cases in the back seat. Pulling a long gun out of the rack in a patrol car is lots quicker than pulling a long gun out of a case in the back seat. This may just have been a situation better handled by the "regular" police.

At least the FBI took this incident to heart and implemented changes in their equipment and procedures and training.
The C1 Squad was using fleet cars, and that rolling felony stop was pretty much improvised… it pretty much took two of the then six SAs on the scene, Manauzzi and Hanlon, right out of the action.

The lack of inter-agency comm was a key ingredient that morning… FBI was talking to one another and a dispatch center which had both bandwidths, but it required retransmission of any messages between them and Metro Miami-Dade.

Yes, the Bureau did take 11 April 1986 "to heart;" they had to, because if certain changes hadn't been changed, they would not have been able to get away with the sort of "spin" they did the first time around.

A brutally objective assessment of the events of that Friday morning reveal, first and foremost, an institutional arrogance on the part of the FBI… "we have 14 agents and ten cars mobilized on this rolling stake-out, and we're the FBI, Gawddamnit! We don't need no stinkin' locals!"

Even after SAC Gordon McNeill made eye-to-eye contact with the two men at low speeds on SW 82nd Avenue, saw that Platt was charging a long gun (the Mini-14) and later described Matix's intense demeanor as "appearing to be that of a man on a mission," it was his estimation that they had it covered.

This is not to gainsay their consideration that some sort of action was required in the quiet little Kendell neighborhood so as to not let their quarry back out onto the South Dixie Highway in much heavier traffic, but it never seemed to occur to any of them that they might not be ready to engage the duo, or that that duo were well-trained, well-practiced and, most importantly, highly motivated.

Aside from SA Ed Mireles' Model 870, no other FBI long guns were ever deployed that day… the other six C1 SAs and four vehicles which did not participate in the firefight had between them four more Remington shotguns, an MP5-SD and an M16.
 
Aside from SA Ed Mireles' Model 870, no other FBI long guns were ever deployed that day… the other six C1 SAs and four vehicles which did not participate in the firefight had between them four more Remington shotguns, an MP5-SD and an M16.

Dean, did the eight agents who were in the fight have any additional weapons they didn't deploy? Long guns or submachine guns? I've always wondered what was in the trunks of those cars and never got used.
 
If you go thru that FBI foia I believe you will find at least one FIB car had an AR15 aboard, probably in trunk. You can also listen to the radio traffic and hear one of the agents in the back seat almost chanting "felony stop."
 
FWIW: Mas' long-overdue response to Dodson may be read here.

Thank you Mr Speir. While some questions still remain in my mind, it does seem that there is some disagreement and a battle that continues between Mr Ayoob and Mr Dodson I'll retract my comment regarding the accuracy of Mr Ayoob's after action report with apologies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top