.30-30 for elk?

Status
Not open for further replies.

joshk-k

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2007
Messages
455
Location
Portland, OR
Hi all!

I've never hunted an elk before but would like to this fall in NW Oregon. I would like to use my lever action .30-30, possibly with a peep sight on it. From reading around and talking with neighbors, it seems like many shots are taken within the .30-30's range, although I know I won't be able to "reach out and touch them." As far as stopping power goes, though, is a .30-30 an appropriate cartridge for an elk?

Josh
 
1000's of elk have been killed with a .30-30. Just keep the shots to within reasonable range.
 
If you hang around here long enough you’ll find someone that’s killed a water buffalo with a squirt gun; however, a 30-30 is a little on the small side for Elk IMO.
 
Your 30-30 is "adequate" for elk at reasonable ranges. Not an ideal cartridge but not a reason to buy another gun either, unless you intend to shoot across canyon at them.

Doug
 
If you hang around here long enough you’ll find someone that’s killed a water buffalo with a squirt gun; however, a 30-30 is a little on the small side for Elk IMO.

Huh??? Why??

Since when is a .30 caliber on the small side?? Sure, its not going to be the gun to go to for a 250 yard shot - but if your within 100 yards there's no reason you couldn't use a .30-30 (unless your a writer at a gun mag or work for an ammo company - and then of course the only thing worthy of an ELK is the newest short_long_magnum_kaboomer)
 
Definitely with good placement. They make factory ammo 30-30 in 170gr Nosler Partition. I'd use that.
 
If you can get close enough. I'd rather have my .308 or 7 mag, but heck, .30-30 has killed about everything that walks North America including the big bears. I know an old fellow that was an indian agent after the war in Alaska. He said the Inuit used .30-30 for everything up there back in those days, was about the only caliber they could get ammo for, I reckon. Just gotta know how to apply the tool.
 
The .30-30 was once more commonly used for elk than it is now.

Of course, back then, hunters usually had good horses with them, stayed out for weeks at a time, didn't have to apply for tag lotteries, and didn't mind tracking their wounded prey for miles, sometimes losing it altogether...

As far as stopping power goes, though, is a .30-30 an appropriate cartridge for an elk?

I think the best answer is, "No."

I know someone who dropped an elk with a neck shot at a fairly decent range with a .22-250, though. That's just what he had in his hand when the elk popped up, and he had a tag. It's still a story passed around this group of hunters, with the caveat that you shouldn't go out LOOKING for elk, carrying a .22-250.

Barnes does make a TSX for .30-30. That ought to help the old cartridge in terms of effectiveness. I'd be more inclined to go TSX than LE. The LE round's advantage probably comes into play at 100+ yards. What you want is something that's as effective as possible out TO 100 yards.

Do you not have access to anything but a .30-30?
 
Don't take anything but a picture perfect broadside shot. The .30-30 will kill any elk, or any other animal for that matter if conditions are perfect. If he is quartering away however, it may lack the punch neccessary to get the bullet where it will do the most good.
 
Be real guys. Good placement at reasonable distance for caliber will put meat on the table. Been there done that. If he is serious about 30-30 for elk, he will practice like a maniac, use a good bullet design and go for it.Don't be snobbish. I'm from Wyoming.
 
Well I often take down water buffalo with a squirt gun so a 30-30 should be fine for elk.
 
if conditions are perfect

That's the key.

In the real world, that's a reason to use a cartridge that some people call "overkill." Conditions are seldom perfect.

I'm not advocating .338-378 Weatherby as a minimum for hunting coyotes or anything. But a little more bullet weight, a little bigger caliber, a little more velocity than the bare minimum required can be a good thing.

Sometimes, there are posts that seem to suggest that you get "extra points" for hunting with the lightest possible caliber. I think that pushes the boundaries of hunting ethics.
 
I'm assuming that he is asking about the 30-30 because that's what he has to use. A bigger caliber wil not insure a kill if placement is not right. A bigger caliber with smigging is a widely held, AND dispelled myth. I appreciate the concern for good conditions with a 30-30, but facts remain. A good ol 170gr Nosler Partion in the boiler room will, not likely disappoint.
 
If guys can kill elk with a bow then a 30-30 should work just fine.

Thats my logic at least.
 
Whoo hoo, logic. I like it. Good logic. Once again, simple but profound response, alluding to those who Do not drink the hype kool aide.
 
30-30 has probably killed more elk in the history of centerfired rifles than any other caliber.Sure it has its limitations but stay within them and you will be fine.
 
Exactly. There's no implied effort to hunt with with the "lightest caliber possible." That's simply what the fellow has to hunt with. No extrapolations needed. Today's world might mirror that of the 1930's, with gun available, and meat needed. I can really relate to that. No need to get technical, when years of experience has already spoken to this issue.
 
I seem to recall a survey taken about 10 years ago, about which caliber was the most used for Elk in Utah, Wyoming, Colorado and Montana--the .300 Win Mag was ahead of the others.

Unfortunately, load and ballistics were not in the survey.

However, ballistics of the .300 Win Mag and the .30-06, both with a 180-gr bullet, are not that wildly dissimilar--in factory form, we're talking 100-200fps, give or take.

I don't see the .30-06 at all as a bad choice for elk--provided the bullet is well-constructed, it has good sectional density and it is not used wildly for cross-canyon shots, as someone else has observed.

Know what shots to pass up, and you'll do well with a 30-30, as our grandfathers surely did.
 
All I hunted with here in Idaho till I was almost 30 yo was my pre 64 Winchester 30-30 and it was all I needed for the elk I killed.
 
Thanks for all the answers, although the verdict still seems up in the air. For the record, I also have a scoped .30-06, that I think probably in general would be a better elk gun. I just haven't shot it very much (I only get to shoot maybe three or four times a year), and feel more comfortable with my .30-30. I was thinking about getting some aperture sights for it to help with better target acquisition in the woods.

Keep the thoughts and advice coming, please!

Josh
 
Truthfully and as someone has already written many thousands of elk have been taken with a 30-30. Us the right bullet and keep shoots to where you can hit the vital area and shoot your 30-30. It should work just fine.

For several generations, in the early 1900's, a 30-30 was considered fine for just about everything on this continent. While I'd like something more powerful if I was hunting big bears and probably elk and moose just to be on the safe side. The 30-30 is still deadly on most game that we find here.
 
Shoot what you feel comfortable with so that you can make a ethical shot. Look at the balistics of the two a 06 is running around 2500 to 2800 a 3030 is running 1700 to 2200rpms. using a 170grn and a 180grn bullet. all this will do is extend your range and energy in ft lbs. You take a 3030 with in its range of 100 to 175 yds and with a well placed shot will take down a Elk. Also JOSK-K said that he is more comfortable with his 3030. You can have the biggest baddest mag money can buy but if you cant shoot it your better off shooting a 22LR.
 
Who has ever incountered a 400 yard shot in the woods. Granted I've never hunted out west, FL., SC,and VT. I've declined on 200 yd shots and taken 150 yd shot with my 30-30.
 
If you hang around here long enough you’ll find someone that’s killed a water buffalo with a squirt gun

What do you recken the minimum caliber squirt gun needed to properly take down a water buffalo is?...

LGB
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top