.300BLK - Poised to win or doomed to fail?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it will stick around. The idea is not new, the 300 whisper, .300 fireball and .300-221 have been around for decades without a fraction of the investment that has gone into the 300BLK.
 
Not to digress too much, then this product is almost strictly intended for the AR market? I am one who swims upstream, and haven't been a real fan of that rifle since I a shot an M16A1 in 1984. But all new products start out with a niche, and then branch out. Perhaps we'll see a CZ 805 Semi auto civilian model in 300 Blackout some year. Hey, a guy can dream!
 
Non AR:

dsc7781.jpg

dsc7773r.jpg

dsc7755.jpg
 
I have to say I am a bit disappointed. I REALLY like the standard mags and bolts. Really like the larger caliber. What disappoints me is that the performance falls a bit short for hunting purposes.

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2010/12/07/bill-wilson-goes-hunting-with-the-300-aac-blk/

Also - go back and look at that gel test from page-1 - from a 9 inch barrel at 100 yards, it had 19.7 inches of penetration, 0.581 expansion, and 98.3% retained wait. That is the opposite of not good for hunting.
 
Last edited:
Also, Savage is making their 10 precision carbine in 300 BLK. You can get it in pretty much whatever platform you want now.

Looks to be staying to me.
 
rsilvers,

Thanks for the hunting report. Good to see some real results. It's not so much that I doubt it's performance as it is that I look at the numbers and think, "shoot, that isn't even as powerful as a 30-30.
 
Remington, DPMS, and Bushmaster guns are all on the way.

Sig 516 will be out soon.

S&W is already shipping.
 
I'll be happy to test one if you have a spare lying around :D
 
Last edited:
rsilvers,

Thanks for the hunting report. Good to see some real results. It's not so much that I doubt it's performance as it is that I look at the numbers and think, "shoot, that isn't even as powerful as a 30-30.
Remember though that the velocities on page 1 are from a 9 inch barrel. A 16 inch barrel will speed those up a bit.

Rsilvers.... what kind of velocity are you getting out of a 16 inch barrel?
 
Has anyone worked out just how cheaply you can reload these things at? .10 cents for brass is really enticing. But it's meaningless if the bullet (.308 bullets are always above .15 cents a round) and powder push reloading 7.62x35 to prices equal that of the .308 Winchester.

Reloading .308 is what has kept me away from .300 BLK so far. I can reload 7.62x51 down to .36 cents a cartridge if I do it right.
 
Thanks for clarifying that for me. I see it as a light carbine round.
 
I don't know if the cartridge will last but it serves no need for me and is obviously ballistically inferior for my needs.
 
Has anyone worked out just how cheaply you can reload these things at? .10 cents for brass is really enticing. But it's meaningless if the bullet (.308 bullets are always above .15 cents a round) and powder push reloading 7.62x35 to prices equal that of the .308 Winchester.

Reloading .308 is what has kept me away from .300 BLK so far. I can reload 7.62x51 down to .36 cents a cartridge if I do it right.

http://www.goldenwestbrass.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=13v

14.5 cents a bullet
10 cents a case
5 cents powder

So 30 cents a round, if you use the brass only once.

If you use the brass 5 times, then 22 cents a round.
 
2215 fps for the Remington 125 grain ammo from a 16 inch barrel.
About 2000 from a 9 inch barrel.
 
That is hard to argue with. Honestly I have been considering getting into reloading and once my .300 is up and running it will probably put me over the edge.
 
Gotta interject - reloading ROCKS! :) That's what a cartridge like this is to me, wide open territory, time to play. Maybe if the Good Lord smiles on me, I can try. What is that AAC Model 7 rifle? Looks like an excellent camp carbine - detachable or fixed mag? Make it like the CZ 527M with a 5 or ten round detachable, and that's a heck o' winner! Even better, convince CZ-UB to make the 527M in that caliber standard.
 
Well, I got my barrel on order with Satern, it'll be sweet --when I get it! I ordered it a few months ago and I don't expect it anytime soon (or later for that matter). I ordered a custom deep fluted 16" carbine barrel, should weigh in at just over one lb. I got the AAC mount and I'll have the SDN6 suppressor for it soon enough (and that puppy will fit three other rifles as well, and maybe a future rifle too!).

I'm no operator, but I had a pretty cool job in the army that left me fascinated with accurized battle rifles, or SDM rifles, as well as custom M4's, AR's, and oddball calibre conversions for them. I have the 6.5Grendel, my absolute favorite rifle and round at the moment (and hard to see it being replaced by anything that works in an AR) great for accurate long range shooting, a .50Beowulf, a 200m sledgehammer that one, 5.56 obviously, and .300BLK soon, it'll be fun shooting with no ear pro when I have the range to myself which happens more than it should (but I won't complain when I have that with me!).

There is the Whisper, but I understand the BLK does it a little better and handles supersonic and subsonic loads alike better. But I also hear it can be finicky if not make right, so buyer beware. I should have gone with AAC on this one, but I was so impressed with Satern's work that I don't mind sticking with him for most of my barrel needs.

Problem is, you need to order a year in advance at least.
 
I tested some Satern barrels for accuracy compared to White Oak made from Kreiger and Shilen. They were all identical on paper. Satern was fast for me at first, but then it was painful. They said that they have more machines and more people now. AAC barrels are not better and no worse than the Satern I had for accuracy - but AAC is nitrided, has the R&D for getting gas ports and thread specs right, and our barrel extensions are great - and we put a lot of thought into our drawings and profiles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top