308 vs 7.62x51 question

Status
Not open for further replies.

twoblink

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
3,736
Location
Houston, Texas
Err...

I can't remember which way it goes, but I suspect it's:

7.62x51 --> 308 Rifle ok

308 --> 7.62x51 Rifle not so ok maybe..

Someone post some SAMMI pressures for me? Thanks.
 
Don't know of any "standardized" pressure measurements for 7.62x51. It has the potential of being higher pressured, because of the thick brass, but SAAMI won't list it. .308 win is 52,000 cup.

The headspace is slightly different for both rounds, around .003" difference I believe but I wouldn't hesitate to fire either round interchangeably. Especially in a bolt gun.

There might be others that disagree with that, but I've never seen a warning on a box of .308 regarding the practice, and in this age of liability, I'm taking that as a sign that if it were a problem there would be warnings all over .308 guns and ammo, and lots of dead or maimed shooters.

I'll let the experts weigh on this, but I've shot both in my bolt guns and my FAL without the slightest problem or sign of high pressure....and I'm talking many thousands of rounds of many manufacture and handloads too.
 
Is this the same sort of difference that exists between .223 and 5.56x45?

If so, what is the SA-58 line of rifles chambered for?
 
I remember there's a pressure difference, that's it. Didn't know there was suppose to be a headspace difference in the specs..

And I keep remember one was ok in one, but not the other way around..

i'm hoping someone will confirm or deny..
 
You can fire .308 Win safely in your 7.62X51 NATO rifle but not always safely the other way around. Same same firing .223 Rem in your 5.56 but not the 5.56 in the .223. Pressures, case dimensions are different.

Simple, either one in a military chambering but not in the civvie.
 
I know that Fulton Armory is sometimes controversial, but i think I trust Clint Mckee's explanation...which can be found here:
http://www.fulton-armory.com/308.htm
dumb question i alway thought these 2 ammos where interchangeable but some have told me otherwise whats the story??? jim

Hi, Jim,

This is a perennial topic, kinda like ".45 vs. 9mm" or "Best Guns & Loads for Deer."

They are not the same.

They are the same.

They are not the same, 'cause the .308 Win was released by Winchester several years before the Army standarized the T64E3 as the 7.62MM. You'll get an endless discussion of pressure specs, endless because SAAMI and the Ordnance Dep't measured pressure in different, unrelateable ways. Howver, the chamber drawings are different.

They are the same, 'cause nobody (and Clint's been looking for many years!) makes 7.62MM ammo that isn't to the .308 "headspace" dimension spec. So 7.62MM ammo fits nicely into .308 chambers, as a rule.

But in some 7.62MM rifles the chambers are long (to the 7.62MM military spec), notably the Navy Garands with 7.62MM barrels. Thus, using commercial ammo in such a rifle is not a good idea; you need stronger brass. Use military ammo or the best commercial only, e.g., Federal Gold Medal Match.

Most of the time it's a distinction without a difference. But if you intend to shoot .308 commercial in a military arm chambered for 7.62MM, first check the headspace with .308 commercial gauges first. You may get a surprise.

Best regards,

Walt Kuleck
Fulton Armory webmaster


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clint, What's the difference between .308 Winchester & 7.62x51mm NATO?

Jerry Kuhnhausen, in his classic Shop Manual (available from Fulton Armory; see the M1 Rifle Parts & Accessories or M14 Rifle Parts and Accessories Pages under Books) has published a somewhat controversial recommendation concerning .308 Winchester and 7.62x51mm NATO ammo, headspace & chambers. I broached the subject with him some months ago. He had his plate full, so we decided to chat on this in the future. When we do I'll report the results of our conversation.

I completely agree with Jerry that if you have a chamber with headspace much in excess of 1.636 (say, 1.638, SAAMI field reject), you must use only U.S. or NATO Mil Spec Ammo (always marked 7.62mm & with a cross enclosed by a circle) since the NATO mil spec calls for a far more "robust" brass case than often found in commercial (read .308 Winchester) cartridges. It is precisely why Lake City brass is so highly sought. Lake City brass is Nato spec and reloadable (most NATO is not reloadable, rather it is Berdan primed). Indeed, cheaper commercial ammo can fail at the 1.638 headspace (e.g., UMC) in an M14/M1 Garand. Many military gas guns (e.g., M14 Rifles & M60 Machine guns) run wildly long headspace by commercial (SAAMI) standards (U.S. Military field reject limit for the M60 & M14 is 1.6455, nearly 16 thousandths beyond commercial (SAAMI) GO, & nearly 8 thousandths beyond commercial (SAAMI) field reject limit!).

I also agree that 1.631-1.632 is a near perfect headspace for an M14/M1A or M1 Garand chambered in .308 Winchester. But I think that it also near perfect for 7.62mm NATO!

I have measured many, many types/manufacturers of commercial and NATO ammo via cartridge "headspace" gauges as well as "in rifle" checks. If anything, I have found various Nato ammo to be in much tighter headspace/chamber compliance than commercial ammo. Indeed, sometimes commercial ammo can not be chambered "by hand" in an M14/M1A with, say, 1.631 headspace (bolt will not close completely by gentle hand manipulation on a stripped bolt, although it will close & function when chambered by the force of the rifle's loading inertia), though I have never seen this with NATO spec ammo. I.e., if anything, NATO ammo seems to hold at the minimum SAAMI cartridge headspace of 1.629-1.630, better than some commercial ammo!

So, why set a very long 1.636 headspace in an M14/M1A or M1 Garand? It probably is the conflict mentioned above. Military headspace gauges say one thing, SAAMI headspace gauges say something else, as do the spec's/compliance covering ammo. In a court of law, who will prevail? I think Kuhnhausen gave all those who do this work a safe way out. However, I believe it not in your, or your rifle's, best interest. Whether you have a NATO chambered barrel (M14/M1 Garand G.I. ".308 Win."/7.62mm NATO barrels all have NATO chambers), or a .308 Winchester chamber, keep the headspace within SAAMI limits (1.630 GO, 1.634 NO GO, 1.638 FIELD REJECT). This subject is a bit confusing, and for me difficult to explain in a one way conversation!

Clint McKee
 
From my less than expert research, the difference is not in the ammo, which is manufacture to minimum size per saami specs for reliability reasons.
The difference is in the amount of slop that is allowed in the barrel chamber due to wear. A military chamber can be more worn than a commercial chamber and still pass the headspace test.

Thats the difference between 5.56 and .223, also the difference between
7.62X51 and .308.

Now some military ammo may be loaded to a slightly higher pressure than Saami spec, and that is yet another issue to be aware of.

I base this on my research on the net as far as the rifle's chamber goes. And I base it on the information in my reloading manuals, Lyman and Speer, and from the websites of powder manufacturers.

JMHO YMMV.

Follow all safety rules in you reloading manuals and that come with your rifles.;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top