.308ARs, Armalite/DPMS

Status
Not open for further replies.

98Z

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2019
Messages
23
I swear I mentioned this gun before, here, but I can't find my reference to it anywhere now. I mentioned a DPMS-based receiver set running all-Armalite guts, and it runs like a champ.

I built an Aero Precision M5 receiver set (upper, lower, rail) and only used Armalite AR-10 internals (recoil system, BCG and barrel), and the damn thing runs like a champ.

P1060970.JPG
This thread is going to go WAY MORE in detail on things like this. I've seen alot of bad information about .308ARs here - incredibly bad information. I'm going to address it. :rofl:
 
It was my understanding that an Armalite upper has to go with an Armalite lower, and an Armalite barrel has to go with an Armalite BGC, but no issue putting an Armalite barrel and bcg in a DPMS upper. I know the barrel nuts are also specific, as are some of the small parts.
 
It was my understanding that an Armalite upper has to go with an Armalite lower, and an Armalite barrel has to go with an Armalite BGC, but no issue putting an Armalite barrel and bcg in a DPMS upper. I know the barrel nuts are also specific, as are some of the small parts.

Barrel and bolt need to match types. The rest of the BCG can actually be of either type and it will be fine. There isn't a meaningful difference in the carriers. Your other points are entirely correct, mixed uppers and lowers are incompatible because of the receiver cuts between the Armalite/DPMS types.
 
I swear I mentioned this gun before, here, but I can't find my reference to it anywhere now. I mentioned a DPMS-based receiver set running all-Armalite guts, and it runs like a champ.

I built an Aero Precision M5 receiver set (upper, lower, rail) and only used Armalite AR-10 internals (recoil system, BCG and barrel), and the damn thing runs like a champ.

View attachment 828834
This thread is going to go WAY MORE in detail on things like this. I've seen alot of bad information about .308ARs here - incredibly bad information. I'm going to address it. :rofl:

Nice looking rifle. There is a lot of bad info out there, that is for sure, been running into it myself recently with one I picked up.
 
My build Aero M5 e1 upper and lower,, I think they are considered DPMS High pattern on my Aero lower kit ( the pin lengths are different ) , Gieselle SSa , triggers same even as AR15 . Has a Criterion 18" barrel SS and black coating light weight .308 mid gas with JP adj block , and you can see the rest . That is a Leupold 2-7 VXR patrol reticule with a Doctor RMR all in GG&G mounts.
IMG_20180402_151047104_HDR.jpg
IMG_20180402_151131930_HDR_1.jpg
 
I just picked this one up, all Armalite. Apparently an older one? No forward assist. Got it for little more than a song. (If anyone could help me pinpoint the date if Mfg. the serial is US 3074XX.) Somebody couldn't wait to get rid of it. I think its been fired some but not a ton. Cleaned and oiled it. Took it out in 24 deg. weather with 20 mph gusts, shot the three shot group shown at 100m. Factory Hornady 150 SST. Really happy; - )
View media item 2273View media item 2272
 
I have two complete Armalite AR10’s and both are shooters. I think you will find that more common then not mshootnit. Enjoy it! Looks to be a “B” model from the looks of the magazine.
 
They need to offer a community college course on the differences and compatibility between AR10 patten rifles because evey thread I read makes me more confused
Indeed! College credit for that would be a good thing! Even between Armalite AR10’s you have the “A” and “B” models which have differences regarding magazine compatibility. If you have a “B” stock up on magazines, as I am guessing somedaythey will be discontinued. Mr. Flair, by the way hailed from Edina Minnesota.
 
They need to offer a community college course on the differences and compatibility between AR10 patten rifles because evey thread I read makes me more confused

I will get into that, in excruciating detail,... and make it all simple. It's really not that hard when you follow a few simple basics. You deviate from those basics, even by 0.100" here or there in recoil systems, or 0.010" on gas port sizing in the barrel - you jack up a gas tube by 3/16" - and your gun doesn't run... Now, combine all those things, together... Crap POS gun, because of minor mistakes by a manufacturer. It's really not that hard, but manufacturers make it hard - by doing what they want. It truly is a simple process to get even the cheapest .308AR to run.
 
I'm about to get hip-deep in the .308AR stuff, and I'll start with the recoil systems, because the biggest problems with functional problems on these large-frame platforms are with the recoil system. Period.

I'll start with some bad information I saw here:

This is because there are multiple options for the buffer tube length/buffer length/buffer weight combo. You did not do your due diligence in ordering. Plain and simple, a buffer tube with the app. 8" internal length requires a 3.25" buffer and appropriate app. 12" .308 roundwire spring or a .308 flatwire spring. Better get an H3 buffer. Carbine length buffer tubes require a 2.5" buffer, H3 or heavy buffer equivalent and the appropriate spring.

There are three major (and many minor) .308AR platforms: DPMS-based, Armalite AR-10-based, and Rock River LAR-8 platforms. The older Bushmaster BAR-10s fall directly, identically, into the RRA LAR-8 platform - they are the same. The RRA is a different animal, completely.

There are three receiver extension depths, in an AR, if you don't talk about carbine recoil systems on the Rock River LAR-8. That gun is COMPLETELY different. The ONLY carbine receiver extension with an internal depth of 8.000" is the RRA LAR-8.

The three other COMMON receiver extension depths are 9 11/16" internal depth (ALL rifle receiver extensions, period, be it AR15 or .308AR). There is NO different rifle receiver extension for "A1" or "A2" - that's a buttstock change, and nothing more than adding a 5/8" spacer to the end of the extension, and a 5/8" longer vented buttstock screw, for the 5/8" longer buttstock on the A2. You add those parts to convert the "A1" to the "A2." That's it. The rifle receiver extension between both, and the internal recoil system parts, are identical. In the AR15, you run a rifle buffer that's 5.900" long, in the .308ARs, you run a buffer that's 5.200" long. The weights in those are different, too.

Carbine receiver extensions: There are only two. Period, full stop. No more. (Again, we're not talking about RRA here, and their massive differences.) There is an AR15 Carbine Receiver Extension that has a 7.000" internal depth, and there's an Armalite AR-10 Carbine Receiver Extension that has a 7 5/8" internal depth. No more.

The DPMS-based LR-308 runs a 7.000" internal depth receiver extension, and has to be used with a 2.500" buffer, and that is, by far, the most common, prolific, .308AR platform out there. The HUGE problem is that everyone and their brother thinks they can make one - and they often screw it up. In spades. "Whatever" for a spring - even AR15 springs that can't handle the "mass for the ass" of the 308 BCG, nor the recoil difference - buffers that are too light - and more often than not, receiver extensions that they just "want to make..." They THINK they got it right... and they don't. They just throw you a bunch of parts in a box, call it a "recoil system" and think it's good. "It worked in our testing..." Whatever.

Armalite designed and made this rifle - and I'll tell you right now, I don't own a single Armalite rifle. I have alot of the parts, but there is not one single "Armalite" upper, lower, complete gun, in my house. However, there are ALOT of Armalite parts in my house. THEY pioneered it, made it a reality, and know what works. Go tell Eugene Stoner that he's wrong...

The AR-10 was the first rifle - not the AR15. It was fully designed with a 5.4oz buffer, because that was "enough mass to control the ass" and the weight of the BCG, cartridge pressure, and everything else associated with firing a .308 Winchester load from "The AR." 5.4oz buffer. Oh, I forgot the spring - the Armalite EA1095 spring. That is THE recoil spring - yeah, same spring, doesn't matter if you're running Rifle recoil system or Carbine recoil system. Same spring does it for both - with a 5.4oz buffer.

The AR-10 Carbine Recoil System was designed around the buffer and buffer spring - they already had the spring, and it was proven in the AR-10 Rifle recoil system. Turns out the same buffer weight was needed (5.4oz) for both rifle and carbine systems. They made a buffer that was 3.250" long, used tungsten for all three weight that would fit it, and guess what? It was 5.4oz. Now, they had to make a receiver extension that would run that 3.250" buffer - the internal depth was determined to be 7 5/8" internal depth - to run the 3.250" long, 5.4oz carbine buffer, and the EA1095 spring.

Done deal - and it works, every single time, on every single DPMS-based or Armalite-based .308 AR.

Not an 8.000" internal depth carbine receiver extension. Definitely not this 7 7/8" internal depth receiver extension - quoted from the same person that said it should be 8.000" internal... ?...

BTW, back when you ordered, a buffer tube with a 7 7/8" inside depth still took a 3.25" buffer, and a carbine length buffer tube still took a 2.5" 308 buffer.

This struck me as odd, the quote below this - the misunderstanding between buffer weight and "it's overgassed..." It's not "overgassed," my man - it's under-recoiled to a HUGE extent. Tell you what - do an experiment for me. Gut your buffer of everything inside it, and shoot it - you think you see "overgassed" right now? You are REALLY gonna see what you think it "overgassed" if you do that! And it doesn't have a single thing to do with your gas system - which would remain completely unchanged... It's UNDER-RECOILED, with that empty buffer. Can't be refuted, in any single way, right there.

and If you add 1.5oz. to your buffer all your overgassing issues will be solved but if you don't add 1.5 oz to your buffer, the next time you fire your rifle it will fall to pieces in your hands and kill a puppy. Adjustable gas block? Never heard of it.

Regardless, The vast majority of the PA10's reportedly run just fine with an H buffer and the PSA supplied spring.

^^^ On that, right there, I've taken a problem rifle from that company, to fix myself, on my own dime. I paid for shipping to me, I fixed it, and I sent it back, and I didn't ask for a single penny from the poor guy that bought it - he just wanted his gun to run. I made it run, and the only thing I asked for in return was the opportunity to handle it, and see what was wrong in the first place. I diagnosed what I could over the interwebz, and it still didn't work. I requested he send me the gun - and he did. What I gained from that was a vast amount of information on what was being shipped to customers - and what it took to fix it, and really make it run.

What it took, in short, was a complete change of the Carbine Recoil System to the Armalite AR-10 Carbine Recoil System, changing the too-short gas tube to one what was 3/16" longer, and drilling up the too-small gas port (18" midlength gas system barrel) from 0.070" to 0.085". After making those changes, it ran FINE.

My next post in this thread is going to be about gas port diameters, gas port location, and the proper gas tube to use. There are some VERY WELL KNOWN barrel manufacturers that can't get the gas port location right, and think that "gas timing" is just something that isn't important. Stay tuned, and get the popcorn out.
 
I'm about to get hip-deep in the .308AR stuff, and I'll start with the recoil systems, because the biggest problems with functional problems on these large-frame platforms are with the recoil system. Period.

I'll start with some bad information I saw here:



There are three major (and many minor) .308AR platforms: DPMS-based, Armalite AR-10-based, and Rock River LAR-8 platforms. The older Bushmaster BAR-10s fall directly, identically, into the RRA LAR-8 platform - they are the same. The RRA is a different animal, completely.

There are three receiver extension depths, in an AR, if you don't talk about carbine recoil systems on the Rock River LAR-8. That gun is COMPLETELY different. The ONLY carbine receiver extension with an internal depth of 8.000" is the RRA LAR-8.

I'll respond to this since you are quoting me.

Actually, I am still entirely correct, which is clear if you provide the entire context of the conversation, which you do not. We were talking about PSA and only PSA

7 7/8" is approximately 8", rounded up. It was clear what we were discussing if you read through the thread....We were discussing available buffer tube options specifically from PSA. If you want to order a buffer tube from PSA that accepts a standard 3.25" buffer, the one you'll need to order is 7 7/8" inside length. 7 7/8", for the context of the conversation, is indeed approximately 8". You are dishonestly quoting a small portion of a large conversation and implying meaning to my words that are completely absent from the conversation when read in its entirety.

It is clear if you take the entire discussion in context and not just the tidbit you are quoting, that was the point, but conveniently enough you forgot to link that discussion so people can get the context on their own, so I'll go ahead and do that for you

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/new-ar-ar10-purchase-options.847954/page-2

The three other COMMON receiver extension depths are 9 11/16" internal depth (ALL rifle receiver extensions, period, be it AR15 or .308AR). There is NO different rifle receiver extension for "A1" or "A2" - that's a buttstock change, and nothing more than adding a 5/8" spacer to the end of the extension, and a 5/8" longer vented buttstock screw, for the 5/8" longer buttstock on the A2. You add those parts to convert the "A1" to the "A2." That's it. The rifle receiver extension between both, and the internal recoil system parts, are identical. In the AR15, you run a rifle buffer that's 5.900" long, in the .308ARs, you run a buffer that's 5.200" long. The weights in those are different, too.

Carbine receiver extensions: There are only two. Period, full stop. No more. (Again, we're not talking about RRA here, and their massive differences.) There is an AR15 Carbine Receiver Extension that has a 7.000" internal depth, and there's an Armalite AR-10 Carbine Receiver Extension that has a 7 5/8" internal depth. No more.

The DPMS-based LR-308 runs a 7.000" internal depth receiver extension, and has to be used with a 2.500" buffer, and that is, by far, the most common, prolific, .308AR platform out there.

Good info, thanks for adding that.

The HUGE problem is that everyone and their brother thinks they can make one - and they often screw it up. In spades.

I'd argue that most companies are assembling good rifles and uppers.
The majority of the problems I've seen have been home builders. Its surprising how many people screw up a build through bad parts selection, then blame the maker of the parts or kit, or whatever they started with.

"Whatever" for a spring - even AR15 springs that can't handle the "mass for the ass" of the 308 BCG, nor the recoil difference - buffers that are too light - and more often than not, receiver extensions that they just "want to make..." They THINK they got it right... and they don't. They just throw you a bunch of parts in a box, call it a "recoil system" and think it's good. "It worked in our testing..." Whatever.

What companies in specific are putting together rifles that won't run as they come?

designed and made this rifle - and I'll tell you right now, I don't own a single Armalite rifle. I have alot of the parts, but there is not one single "Armalite" upper, lower, complete gun, in my house. However, there are ALOT of Armalite parts in my house. THEY pioneered it, made it a reality, and know what works. Go tell Eugene Stoner that he's wrong...

There are plenty of adaptations of Stoners design that function just fine. There are very few of Stoners original specs being followed, if any. Nearly all AR308's aside from a few purpose built replicas deviate from Stoners design, some quiet substantially. As far as I know, there is not parts compatibility between Stoners original design and any modern AR308's. As far as Stoner knowing "What works "...Not many AR308's look like this anymore. Deviating substantially from Stoners design is "What works" in many cases. A shell deflector is "what works", missing from Stoners design. A flattop upper for ease of optics mounting is "what works" and is missing from Stoners design.

jerryar1403.jpg

The AR-10 was the first rifle - not the AR15. It was fully designed with a 5.4oz buffer, because that was "enough mass to control the ass" and the weight of the BCG, cartridge pressure, and everything else associated with firing a .308 Winchester load from "The AR."

Since the original AR-10, many different variations on barrel length and gas system length have been developed. There are a lot of variables once you account for gas port sizing to accommodate different barrel and system lengths. A one-size-fits-all recommendation for a 5.4oz buffer weight doesn't really take into consideration all the possible combinations of barrel length, gas system length, and port size that can be tuned or set up to run a myraid of buffer weights properly. IMO the optimal buffer weight is one that functions the rifle the most reliably. Anything other than that, (ejection pattern, brass condition, recoil impulse, etc...) is not really fixing anything, its optimizing for your personal preferences.


5.4oz buffer. Oh, I forgot the spring - the Armalite EA1095 spring. That is THE recoil spring - yeah, same spring, doesn't matter if you're running Rifle recoil system or Carbine recoil system. Same spring does it for both - with a 5.4oz buffer.

So how exactly are factory springs lacking? I agree that there are better ones out there,but you spend some time trashing factory springs and you don't say why.
I would recommend the Tubbs flatwire spring over the Armalite for the added tension on the bolt in battery, but It sounds like either will work.

The AR-10 Carbine Recoil System was designed around the buffer and buffer spring - they already had the spring, and it was proven in the AR-10 Rifle recoil system. Turns out the same buffer weight was needed (5.4oz) for both rifle and carbine systems.

If you are talking about the buffer tube length, I'd agree. Length is not important to buffer size.
I'd say the proper buffer weight depends much more on your gas port size if you don't have an AGB, the barrel length you are using and what gas system you are using rather than buffer tube length.

They made a buffer that was 3.250" long, used tungsten for all three weight that would fit it, and guess what? It was 5.4oz. Now, they had to make a receiver extension that would run that 3.250" buffer - the internal depth was determined to be 7 5/8" internal depth - to run the 3.250" long, 5.4oz carbine buffer, and the EA1095 spring.

Done deal - and it works, every single time, on every single DPMS-based or Armalite-based .308 AR.

Sounds like a good combo, one of many.

Not an 8.000" internal depth carbine receiver extension. Definitely not this 7 7/8" internal depth receiver extension - quoted from the same person that said it should be 8.000" internal... ?...

Like I said, you took the one time I approximated and didn't specify the PSA buffer tube as having a 7 7/8" inside length and are quoting me entirely out of context to make a false point.

This struck me as odd, the quote below this - the misunderstanding between buffer weight and "it's overgassed..." It's not "overgassed," my man - it's under-recoiled to a HUGE extent. Tell you what - do an experiment for me. Gut your buffer of everything inside it, and shoot it - you think you see "overgassed" right now? You are REALLY gonna see what you think it "overgassed" if you do that! And it doesn't have a single thing to do with your gas system - which would remain completely unchanged... It's UNDER-RECOILED, with that empty buffer. Can't be refuted, in any single way, right there.

What results do you think I'd get, and what do you think that would be proving?

That is your subjective opinion and does not mean a rifle that functions perfectly reliably with whatever buffer it came with needs to be running anything heavier unless the owner wishes to tune for different operating characteristics, such easy ejection, suppression, or the lowest recoil. Some companies might want their rifles to function exuberantly for maximum reliability with all ammo. In that case, the lighter buffer might be purposeful. I've also read plenty of cases where owners had to switch to an AGB even after adding a heavier buffer and spring to get the desired results. Some people have reported having to go extra heavy, 9mm buffers and beyond, to get to where they wanted to be and still didn't get there until they added an AGB. A popular 3 gun setup is a light buffer, light carrier, and an AGB. So I think you are a little narrow in your view of what is "proper" for AR308's.


On that, right there, I've taken a problem rifle from that company, to fix myself, on my own dime. I paid for shipping to me, I fixed it, and I sent it back, and I didn't ask for a single penny from the poor guy that bought it - he just wanted his gun to run. I made it run, and the only thing I asked for in return was the opportunity to handle it, and see what was wrong in the first place. I diagnosed what I could over the interwebz, and it still didn't work. I requested he send me the gun - and he did. What I gained from that was a vast amount of information on what was being shipped to customers - and what it took to fix it, and really make it run.

That was very nice of you, but that doesn't mean the gun you saw anything more than an anecdotal example of a used gun after someone worked on it unsuccessfully.

What it took, in short, was a complete change of the Carbine Recoil System to the Armalite AR-10 Carbine Recoil System, changing the too-short gas tube to one what was 3/16" longer, and drilling up the too-small gas port (18" midlength gas system barrel) from 0.070" to 0.085". After making those changes, it ran FINE.

Without knowing more about the rifle in question, I can't really speak specifically as to the problems it had from the factory and how I would have gone about diagnosing them, but that's very nice of you and i'm glad it solved his problems. However, that doesn't mean that all those modifications were necessary to get the gun running properly. For instance, if the gas port was too small leading to symptoms of undergassing, you could very well have simply fixed it with a lighter buffer. A heavier one would only make it worse in that situation.

My next post in this thread is going to be about gas port diameters, gas port location, and the proper gas tube to use. There are some VERY WELL KNOWN barrel manufacturers that can't get the gas port location right, and think that "gas timing" is just something that isn't important. Stay tuned, and get the popcorn out.

I'll bet money that you are going to have a lot to say about gas tube length and where the gas tube sits in the upper receiver. I have seen you making noise about that on AR308, but you have yet to provide any instances on a factory assembled rifle where malfunctions can specifically be traced to the reduced length of a short gas tube. In fact, the one thread I saw you try and diagnose a problem as such, It turned out to be a completely different issue altogether unrelated to gas tube length, and you were too busy misdiagnosing the gas tube length to notice the very obvious actual problem even. Someone even correctly diagnosed the problem very early on in the thread and yet you STILL refused to consider anything other than the gas tube as the issue. You then made yourself look like a bit of an ass by publicly attacking the person who correctly diagnosed the problem in a very vulgar and personal way instead of admitting you were wrong, because they questioned your incorrect diagnosis. Quiet frankly, I'm not very impressed with your critical thinking skills based on that thread and see no reason to put any weight to your words on the subject.

You have gas tube induced tunnel vision and are kind of a one trick pony as far as the recoil system is involved.

I'll be looking forward to seeing your evidence to suggest that changing gas tubes out to the Armalite is even optimal, let alone necessary.

Just curious...At what point to you consider a rifle to be overgassed?
 
Last edited:
Unlike the AR-15 there is no mil-spec standard for the AR308 platform as far as I know. So while an AR-10 might have been developed with one set of standards we can plainly see a broader range of specifications depending on manufacturer for the AR308 (whether devolved or evolved). So then the question is the difference between non-functional, functional, and optimized.
What is the specific depth of the gas tube into the carrier gas key and how does it relate to timing when referencing non-functional, functional, and optimized operation? Is using the cam pin cutout in the receiver as reference reliable between all manufacturers? Is there a difference in the fore or aft location of the gas key on the carrier between any of the manufacturers? How does that coincide with the gas tube length? Knowing a different gas key location on the carrier that is higher over bore than an AR-15 (by necessity) it seems a shortcut to use a conventional AR-15 gas tube that isn't bent to take into account this different height over bore but what specific negatives are associated with this tube dimensional difference?
 
It’s disappointing to see so many folks with closed minded thinking in regards to the multitude of combinations which all work for AR pattern rifles. For so many folks, any malfunction leads to a solution to convert the rifle to ONE design.

It’s like walking into any restaurant in the world, the waiter asking, “what would you like this evening?” And the diner answering, regardless of the country or region, regardless of type of restaurant, “I’ll have a burger.”

Guys miss out on so many opportunities with these rifles when they pretend (or lie to themselves) only ONE combination works.
 
For so many folks, any malfunction leads to a solution to convert the rifle to ONE design.

If your life or anything you consider important will ever depend on having a functional gun, it makes a little bit of sense to maintain consistency for the sake of functionality.

I couldn't number the various forums and threads I've seen where builds built around reputable "all-star" parts failed because of the inconsistencies between various patterns. It's not because the parts aren't good, it's because the large AR isn't a standardized platform, and as a general principle, consistency between parts of a given design simply tends to work better than "grab bagging" parts willy nilly.
 
My build Aero M5 e1 upper and lower,, I think they are considered DPMS High pattern on my Aero lower kit ( the pin lengths are different ) , Gieselle SSa , triggers same even as AR15 . Has a Criterion 18" barrel SS and black coating light weight .308 mid gas with JP adj block , and you can see the rest . That is a Leupold 2-7 VXR patrol reticule with a Doctor RMR all in GG&G mounts.
View attachment 828919
View attachment 828920
Gordon nice rifle setup, I am overall very happy with my AeroM5.
 
Simple. When your life depends on the reliability of a weapons system, you don’t round up to the nearest inch on any part of it. Especially just to defend a previous comment. As far as the rationale for using a complete recoil buffer system from Armalite, I suggest you take a course in integrated systems engineering and start to understand the difference between that and a company that orders parts from different manufacturers and assembles and sells them with out exhaustive testing. Which unfortunately is all too common.
 
Last edited:
Simple. When your life depends on the reliability of a weapons system, you don’t round up to the nearest inch on any part of it. Especially just to defend a previous comment. As far as the rationale for using a complete recoil buffer system from Armalite, I suggest you take a course in integrated systems engineering and start to understand the difference between that and a company that orders parts from different manufacturers and assembles and sells them with out exhaustive testing. Which unfortunately is all too common.

Lol, that makes four people who have registered in the last week from over on AR308. You guys travel in packs

A discussion on a gun forum isn't a firefight in your living room, and nobody's life is going to depend on my rounding up or rounding down in a discussion where eeeeeveryone knew what was being discussed.. That is a silly argument.
 
Last edited:
That is a silly argument.

it's actually so silly it could be considered a straw man, which is what you just did....

up to this point in the thread, nobody mentioned a firefight in their living room except you. That has nothing to do with the discussion going on at present, yet you felt it was relevant. So keep hitting that straw man.
 
Actually, I addressed the argument directly.

Whether you like it or not I rounded, and it worked just fine in the context of the discussion.

When your life depends on the reliability of a weapons system, you don’t round up to the nearest inch on any part of it.

This is just hyperbole, a convenient trope that ignores the context of my statements
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top