I bought the P32 in the middle of last year - I thought about buying the 380 - but the recoil is higher. I could shoot the 32 all day (if the ammo wasn't so high), and my hand wouldn't hurt.
Shipwreck, so you find that 32 cal ammo is expensive and you can't shoot your P-32 all day because it hurts your hand!
Yes, if you shoot a P-3AT all day, it will make your hand sore too, but you said the P-32 does anyway
You said that 32 cal ammo is expensive and that's true. 380 ammo is cheaper, more readily available and there are more kinds of 380 ammo available than there is 32 ammo.
So what is the problem with the P-3AT then?
Also, at the time, I tended to see more complaints about problems with the 380 version over the 32 version. Don't get me wrong - there are many satisifed owners of the 380 version. But it seemed that the likelyhood of getting a headache gun was lower with the 32.
I owned two P-32 pistols and purchased a P-3AT when they came out.
After shooting the P-3AT a couple of times, I traded my two P-32 pistols in for a second P-3AT, because I found it to be more accurate and felt recoil was no problem for up to 50 round range sessions.
I can tell you from personal experience that the P-3AT is every bit as reliable as the P-32.
Anyone that says there is not a rimlock problem in the 32 cal is flat wrong! I had it happen in my P-32.
I also now have a third, P-3AT that is a second generation model and it too has been trouble free.
IMO, if someone is trying to decide between a P-32 and a P-3AT, you are doing them a disservice telling them the 32 cal is a better deal.-
There is only one advantage I can see in the P-32 and that is, it has a slide stop and that's it!-
The P-3AT is more powerfull.-
Uses cheaper ammo.-
Has more brands of ammo available.-
Ammo is more readily available-
There is no possibility of rim lock with the 380 round.-
Just the facts-