351 WINCHESTER
Member
I knew that was too good to be true. I have read that the bullets are .357 & .355 so I guess it's anybody's guess right now.
I do believe they will end up being .355" in the factory loads...
DM
I'd like to know that one myself!That seems so strange, why in the world go .355 over .357/.358, given the bullet selections available for each?
i don't think they want guys reloading for it, not many .355 bullets will handle the speed, so they will make over pried bullets that are more then loaded ammo. i mean winchester really could off had a winner, if it was a true 223/357 round.That seems so strange, why in the world go .355 over .357/.358, given the bullet selections available for each?
The saami drawing shows bullet diameter is .357”
https://www.nssf.org/saami-announces-acceptance-350-legend-cartridge/
Lol, It's not complicated, it just seems like a bad idea. They could do all of that starting with nominal .357 bullet size instead of 9mm. 9mm bullet availability isn't going to draw anyone in, the selection of suitably tough and or heavy 9mm bullets pales in comparison to the same in .357. They could still come out with a handful of specially developed bullets if they wanted to, it just wouldn't be as critical to the survival of the chambering, and no one would be the least bit concerned about swaging 9mm bullets up for a case that already had plenty of better options.I’m guessing it is the 450 Bushmaster theory (contrasted against 458soc principles)- use pistol caliber bullets so guys will be attracted to inexpensive plinking bullets, then drive development of a handful of serviceable hunting bullets. Not really so complicated.
It’s not so difficult to draw a .357” bullet down to .355” either - while it’s quite a challenge to swage a .355” up to .357”...
Lol, It's not complicated, it just seems like a bad idea. They could do all of that starting with nominal .357 bullet size instead of 9mm. 9mm bullet availability isn't going to draw anyone in, the selection of suitably tough and or heavy 9mm bullets pales in comparison to the same in .357. They could still come out with a handful of specially developed bullets if they wanted to, it just wouldn't be as critical to the survival of the chambering, and no one would be the least bit concerned about swaging 9mm bullets up for a case that already had plenty of better options.
Edit: Nevermind, actually looking at the SAAMI drawings, the .350 is sized for .357 bullets, just with a slightly tighter bore, probably to help with accuracy. .357-.003 for the .350 L and .358-.003 for both the .357 Mag and .38 special. Much to do about nothing, they didn't make a stupid after all.
9mm bullet availability isn't going to draw anyone in
I think you are grossly mistaken in this statement. Very few people buy firearms to hunt any more, and the preferential success of the 450 Bushmaster over the 458 Socom has proven folks will migrate to AR rounds chambered for pistol bullets over a rifle bullet...
Grossly mistaken in my assessment that the compatibility of a new rifle cartridge (explicitly intended for hunting) with 9mm pistol bullets instead of heavier, tougher, more velocity appropriate .357 pistol bullets is somehow an asset that's going to cause customers to jump into line, wallet in hand? I don't think so.
It's a moot point either way, because Winchester made the obviously correct choice to go with a bore size that accommodated more appropriate existing .357 pistol bullets.
People migrated to the Bushmaster in larger numbers recently because it meets the deer hunting regs in certain states where many other rifle rounds are prohibited. Nothing to do with pistol vs rifle bullets, and certainly not indicative of very few people buying firearms for hunting anymore, in fact, quite the opposite.
I’m guessing it is the 450 Bushmaster theory (contrasted against 458soc principles)- use pistol caliber bullets so guys will be attracted to inexpensive plinking bullets, then drive development of a handful of serviceable hunting bullets. Not really so complicated.
It’s not so difficult to draw a .357” bullet down to .355” either - while it’s quite a challenge to swage a .355” up to .357”...
.350 Legend is for PCR regs.
.35 cal and up,
Straight wall case.
,308 aint legal.
I have a 357 maximum which is where I learned this through testing. There really isn’t an ideal bullet for the 357 max. The best is probably the 180 xtp, but you can overpower it even in pistol barrels. My 13” 357 max will drive a 180 xtp to 2200 FPS, but the bullet won’t hold up well at those speeds. The next best option is a 180 Speer hot core which is a .358 bullet for the 35 Remington. That one is a little hard for 357 maximum but should work really nice for the 350 legend going mabey 2300 FPS or so.
There are very few bullets that work well which is why I’m really excited for this. I don’t want the 350 legend, I want the bullets that are going to be made for it to load in my 357 maximum.
This is the key point. It's a solution to a legal problem, not a technical one. From a technical perspective it's questionable at best with the 180gr power point load barely edging into the bottom end of deer territory in terms of sectional density (only 0.2). But if you want to hunt deer in a straight wall state, and you're glued to the small AR platform to do it (why???) then it's your cartridge.
I agree if the cartridge takes off the bullets will be there. 450 Bushmaster is a great example of that and I have sized .458 bullets down to .452 for my 450 BM.
But if 350 Legend is truly a .355 caliber cartridge rather than what many assumed was going to be .357 caliber cartridge that causes a problem for Ohio hunters and maybe a few other states. Ohio hunting regulation very specifically states that to be a legal handgun or rifle cartridge it has to be straight walled and .357 caliber or larger. I grew up in Ohio and have asked specifically if 9x19mm was legal for deer and was told no; I asked about 38 special and was told yes. When Ohio say, ".357 or larger" they mean, ".357 or larger."
The SAAMI specs for the cartridge do seem a bit strange when you compare both the bullet diameter and bore and groove specs to other common .355, .356, .357, .358 caliber cartridges. It seems from the specs you could argue many of those are acceptable but it sure looks like the best argument is this is likely .355 diameter.
Are you saying 350 Legend shooting a 180gr 35 caliber bullet at ~2100 fps (over 1700 ft-lbs of muzzle energy) is margin for whitetail deer?
A 22LR will reliably kill a deer under the right conditions, so context is everything...
But a 180grn 35cal has terrible sectional density - it doesn’t kill nearly as well as its weight would suggest.
I shoot 180grn 35cal pills at 1850ish from a Redhawk, rifle bullets even - it’ll kill a deer at 300yrds under perfect conditions, but for the energy and mass you’re moving, it loses velocity fast and doesn’t penetrate nearly as well as it could. For a short range hammer, I’d stoke up a heavier pill.
Just reload it with a 357-358 cast boolit. Problem solved!