loose noose
Member
Well I tried some 9mm cast bullets in my 92FS, which has been swaged at .356. In fact my Lyman mold drops them right at .358, using #2 lead which drops them right at 119-121 grains. I used a soft lube SPG (primarily for black powder), and the same results using Red Angel hard lube.
The results were terrible if I say the least. Terrible accuracy, as well as a lot of leading, contributing to the inaccuracy. Note I was using 3.9grains of Bullseye. The first 5 rounds would stay nice and close but the other 5 rounds would go into orbit. This is after cleaning the bore after the first 10 rounds on each different lubed bullets?
I haven't had any problems using this in .356 sized #2 lead, and using Red Angel hard lube. No leading, and accuracy is excellent. The weight of the bullet is the same in both instances, as is the charge of powder.
My chronograph averaged the loads using the Red Angel at 1118.2 with a deviation of 12.2, The SPG averaged about the same 1127.6 deviation 8.6.
My main concern is the leading using the .358 sizing die? Any comments on this would be greatly appreciated.
The results were terrible if I say the least. Terrible accuracy, as well as a lot of leading, contributing to the inaccuracy. Note I was using 3.9grains of Bullseye. The first 5 rounds would stay nice and close but the other 5 rounds would go into orbit. This is after cleaning the bore after the first 10 rounds on each different lubed bullets?
I haven't had any problems using this in .356 sized #2 lead, and using Red Angel hard lube. No leading, and accuracy is excellent. The weight of the bullet is the same in both instances, as is the charge of powder.
My chronograph averaged the loads using the Red Angel at 1118.2 with a deviation of 12.2, The SPG averaged about the same 1127.6 deviation 8.6.
My main concern is the leading using the .358 sizing die? Any comments on this would be greatly appreciated.