Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

38 S&W

Discussion in 'Handguns: General Discussion' started by 4v50 Gary, Sep 15, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,930
    You know, that shorty bullet that you can cut down a 38 Special to fit into. Was told at a gunshop today that it was all the rage back in the early days before the 38 Special came out. Hmmmm?

    Anyway, I bought about 6 boxes of 38 Special (reloads @ $5.95 a box of 50) that was marketed by a gunstore that closed over 15 years ago. Ammo is in excellent condition and I plan to shoot it from my Diamondback.
     
  2. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    I trust you’re not serious …..

    The .38 S&W is both shorter then a .38 Special and slightly larger in diameter. You could cut down .38 Special cases but they’d likely split if you shot them in a .38 S&W chamber. Thirty-eight S&W bores are .360 as opposed to the Special’s at .356-.358.

    You can shoot .38 Short Colt and .38 Long Colt in a .38 Special, but the .38 S&W only interchanges with the .38 Colt New Police, which no one has manufactured in decades.
     
  3. Johnny Guest

    Johnny Guest Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,721
    Location:
    North Texas
    UMMmmmmmm - - - -

    Gary, I'm not sure I follow you here.

    Yep, the .38 S&W ctg came out some years prior to the .38 Spl, and all the observations made by Old Fuff concerning same are correct, AFAIK. And, yes, it was a good little ctg - - Continued in first line use with the Brits til after WW-II, as the .380-200 and .380 2Z.

    And, there were a lot of the Brit .38 S&W revolvers bored out to accept the .38 Spl ctg - - This was post- WWII. It worked after a fashion, but something over a third of the Spl cases would split when fired in such a conversion.

    But I don't see the relaitonship of your first paragraph with the second.

    The .38 Spl reloads will probably work fine in your Diamondback - - It was only ever made in .38 Spl and .22 rimfire. How does this pertain to the .38 S&W ctg or firearms?

    Best,
    Johnny
     
  4. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,930
    Regarding 1st paragraph, was told that but never checked dimensions in loading manual. Thanks Old Fuff.

    On 2nd, no relation at all but it was all at the same gun shop. The ammo is 38 special ammo that I bought for the Diamondback in 38 special (not 38 S&W). The ammo is over 20 years old and the price was about the same as it was 20 years ago.
     
  5. Mike Irwin

    Mike Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,956
    Location:
    Below the Manson-Nixon line in Virginia...
    Hey Gary,

    If you trim it enough on all sides, a .44 Spl. will fit into a .38 S&W... ;)
     
  6. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    I've got a WWII British Service revolver (actually Canadian Service) which is basically an S&W Military and Police (or Model 10) that shoots 38 S&W (actually 38/200). Whew! :rolleyes: I can never find ammo for the dang thing anyway. However, it does shoot pretty well and has negligable recoil.
     
  7. Hand_Rifle_Guy

    Hand_Rifle_Guy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    616
    Location:
    Palo Alto, People's Republic of Kaliforny
    Hyphen-happy post...about a "good little cartridge"...

    My Secret Service Special, an H&R-manufactured five-shot top-break revolver chambered for the oldy-but-goody .38 S&W, is a 'teens/twenties finely-built, deep-blued piece of wishes-it-was-a-REAL-S&W-but-still-excellent workmanship that puts modern work by the aspired-to company to shame.

    With modern black-equivalent reloads, this gun displays superb accuracy, no doubt assisted by the infinitesmal grooved-latch rear sight, and almost-sharp blade front sight. If you can SEE the sights, they require nothing short of precision alignment. Beyond that, the relatively cheap reloads I've been able to find ($11-$13/50) have been very consistent despite an equally-consistent tendency to leave funny yellow unburned powder flakes behind.

    This flyweight, dinky little gun has negligible recoil, is actually very quiet, and point-shoots at about 25' range easily as well as my Astra 600, of all things. (That tranlates into keeping 4/5 on a 1-gallon OJ jug on the first try, where the Astra was 7/8, and I do not practice any kind of point shooting. Both surprised the heck outta me.) It's smaller than a j-frame, too.

    Typically loaded with a 145-grain LRN bullet rated at a piddling 685 FPS from a 3" barrel, what really interested me in this cartridge was Elmer Kieth's endorsement of it in Sixguns. He called it a good little cartridge that was accurate, and had a place in small top-break revolvers of which there are many and numerous examples. For that reason he thought it should be continued in the factory line-up. He particularly credited an old S&W top-break pocket pistol he had that would regularly out-shoot other, larger guns, much to the consternation of a few wager-willing lawmen.

    Kieth's endorsement was also balanced against the competition of a few different Colt calibers that used heeled hollow-base bullets, as these calibers were notoriously less accurate than inside-lubed rounds. The Colt calibers, while adequately accurate for defense purposes, could not withstand the marketing claims of greater accuracy by the S&W line, and have since fallen by the wayside. (Formal target shooting was a big part of everyone's advertising then, back before handguns developed that well-known penchant for going off by themselves, and shooting children on purpose.) This includes the very good .41 Colt, which has no supplanting equivalent inside-lubed round like the .41 Special. (A lack I feel someone should try and fill, and not with a .357 Mag or a .44 Special. Colt frames are more properly .41 size. But that's another discussion.)

    In my direct experience, Elmer's right. The .38 S&W IS a good little cartridge, particularly in guns sized to it's output, and I'm more enamored of it's 145-grain bullet than the .380's and 9mm Mak's lighter 90-grain loads. The dinkum little top-break revolvers made by decent builders have accumulated an undeserved reputation as "Suicide Specials", and I think they still have a legitimate place in a self-defense battery. They work, they're small, they're accurate. What else does one need? They sure beat a .32. (Except maybe those tiny Iver-Johnson 5-shot .32's. Those lethal little toys are like watchmaker's guns. They can go where even an I/J-frame can't.)

    And while everyone goes on about the Detective Special, one shouldn't forget the Banker's Special that preceeded it. Those are gems. I want one, especially now that I have a Police Positive Special so I knop what Colt D-frames are all about.

    And ask C.R. Sam about his I-frame S&W. See if he'd part with it, or trade it for a 9mm. 'Nuff said.
     
  8. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    Bankers’ Specials cost a fortune on the collector’s market, but Police Positive revolvers, which are the same gun with a longer barrel are considerably cheaper. One can have a Detective Special barrel fitted to a Police Positive frame and have a homebuilt Banker’s Special for much less cost then the real thing, or save even more money by shortening the original barrel to 2 inches, or even less and replacing the front sight.

    Also, because of the “V†mainspring, that is located in the upper part of the handle, one can have the butt shortened to use grips made for the later Agent model. All of this translates into an interesting pocket gun that doesn’t require a lot of investment.
     
  9. telewinz

    telewinz Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,305
    Location:
    Ohio
    I use to enjoy shooting a Webley MKIV 380/200. I reloaded it with 38 Super dies and cast 175 grain RN bullets which just about equalled the 180 grain load the British used during WW2. Of course it is a very mild load but was considered by the British to have the same stopping power of the 455 Webley! It seems that with the (original load) 200 grain lead bullet (Colt Super Police load ?)and the rate of twist, the 200 grain lead bullet would tumble (unstable) on impact which it was designed to do. Hence the stopping power equal to the 455 Webley.
     
  10. Hardtarget

    Hardtarget Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    3,076
    Location:
    Nashville, Tn.
    Three years ago my wife's uncle died. When we cleaned his place I found a box of S&W.38 ammo...too bad we never found the pistol. :( I'll always wonder what happened to it.
    Mark.

    edit:I can't type.
     
  11. Gunhamr

    Gunhamr Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    Troy, TN USA
    I still have one of the WWII Lend-Lease Victory model S&W that was made and shipped to Britian. It has Bitish proof marks and is still in the original .38 S&W caliber [38/200 Brit.] I shoot it frequently and enjoy it.
    I like it so well that I bought dies for it and load it on my Dillon RL550B. It is surprisingly accurate allowing for the fact that the original bullet diameter was .360 and I use .358 cast bullets.

    Right after WWII I saw literally thousands of these fine old guns butchered by reaming the cylinder take a .38 Special case. Not only were they not accurate but as stated above, the cases usually split. Many times I have heard a shooter make the statement that he didn't care for them splitting because he wasn't going to reload them anyway. What a waste of good old guns.

    This was a variation of the Military & Police which was later called the Model 10. Smith never catalogued this model but after the war they called it the Model 11 just for calarification. There are still a few around for about $150/175. If I didn't already have one would latch onto one right now.
     
  12. C.R.Sam

    C.R.Sam Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,632
    Location:
    Chino Valley, AZ., USA
    I have a couple little break tops that , though not all powerfull, I would have no qualms defending myself with.

    And....I would trade an I frame for a 9mm......9X32R that is. If I wanted that particular gun.

    Sam...be wary of the codger with a wheel. He might dot your eyes.
     
  13. Hand_Rifle_Guy

    Hand_Rifle_Guy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    616
    Location:
    Palo Alto, People's Republic of Kaliforny
    I meant 9 x 19, and you know it!

    You wouldn't trade that snazzy little I-frame for a 9 Sillymeter, would you Sam?

    Well, I could see it going for a prize Luger, I suppose. That might actually have enough Style and History to be worthwhile.
     
  14. tex_n_cal

    tex_n_cal Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    CA
    As someone who has loaded a bunch of odd things, let me say that I wouldn't search a .38 S&W out on purpose, but if a nice one happened along at a fair price, I wouldn't turn up my nose at it, either.

    Although good ammo must be handloaded for it, the short case is a better match to mild subsonic loads, than the Special case. With good correctly sized bullets, in a good revo, it's capable of bagging bullets, rabbits, or goblins with good economy and mild recoil.
     
  15. slabsides

    slabsides Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    121
    Location:
    Maine
    My wife's uncle spent over 25 years in the NYPD, most of that time in a plain-clothes pawn-shop detail. He wasn't a gunny, but he could shoot well enough to earn extra days off on qualification day...and his carry gun was a 4" barrel nickled, pearl-gripped Colt Police Positive (not Special) in .38 S&W. We have the gun now, and it still shoots well, though it is somewhat loose. It usually rests in my wife's dresser, loaded with six wadcutters "against the day". Every so often we take it out and check it for function. It's no magnum, but I'd not want to stand in front of it. Its long-gripped D-frame is just right for a woman's hand, as is the light report and recoil.
    I've cut down top-break .38 S&W Iver Johnsons for belly guns, too. Hammerless DA only, they are a remarkable foretaste of today's pocket rockets. A couple of police officers are still carrying those. The ammo is a bit hard to find, but it's still around. I reload it with regular .38 special dies and soft lead bullets, which probably shouldn't be done, but works.
     
  16. jar

    jar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2003
    Messages:
    453
    Location:
    Texas!!!!!
    Another fan of the 38S&W. I have a couple of them, a S&W M-3 4th change and an early Police Positive. Of the two, the slightly larger grip on the PP makes me a little more accurate. But the Smith is the one that ganers the most attention at the range.
     
  17. Keith

    Keith Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,784
    Location:
    Kodiak, Alaska
    Let us know how the recoil is when you do find some ammo!

    Hehe!

    Keith
     
  18. C.R.Sam

    C.R.Sam Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,632
    Location:
    Chino Valley, AZ., USA
    Keith
    :D
    Sam
     
  19. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,797
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Yea, I'll be sure to let you know. :rolleyes: :D

    Maybe I'll feel a little better about it's stopping power then also. ;)
     
  20. Gordon

    Gordon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    8,442
    Location:
    central Kali.
    My favorite 38S&W is a Merwin & Hulbert I have. It has a 3.5" barrel and a folding hammer spur. It is nickle with about 85% finish remaining. It was fired very little before I got it. I've fired it a couple hundred times with factory ammo,it groups about 3" at 15yds and hits on the money, cleaning very carefully between sessions(over a 20 year period). To see how finely finished would bring tears to a machinists eyes! The cylinder is supported on the pin by a column of air that is compressed when cylinder is slid in(because of unbelievablly tight tolerences ,yet smooth like oil)!!! I can see carrying one of these 100years ago. Mine was made in middle 90's. I carried it concealed a few times going to SF ect., it felt right and I felt secure!:D
     
  21. Rogelio

    Rogelio Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    288
    Location:
    Lima,Peru
    Now here is the thing:

    My mom has one of those .38S&W revolvers (Chrome finish, 5 shots, break top and with a really cool "automatic" shell ejector that pops up when the gun is opened..)

    Now, here in Peru the is absolutely no ammo for that thing..I read on this post that .38spl cases break when shot, but we can not reaload here anyway...(it is illegal down here...)

    So, If I were to shoot .38spl from it, wil the gun handle the cartridge?? (Gunsmith says it is in perfect working order, but has little to none experience with one of those). Should I shoot LRN or FMJ?? Thanks amlot for the help...
     
  22. C.R.Sam

    C.R.Sam Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,632
    Location:
    Chino Valley, AZ., USA
    Don't.

    The .38 Special MAY blow the gun, if it will fit in the cylinder and still allow the cylinder to rotate.

    .38 Special is very slightly smaller in diameter but appreciably longer.

    Some .38 S&W guns will chamber and function with .38 Special ammo but they weren't designed to handle the additional trauma from firing them.

    Sam
     
  23. Rogelio

    Rogelio Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    288
    Location:
    Lima,Peru
    thanks for the tip..you have sured saved me from a really painful moment..
     
  24. telewinz

    telewinz Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,305
    Location:
    Ohio
    Many "experts" suggest you should NOT shoot any of the nickel plated top-break revolvers, even S&W! The quality of hese "suicide specials" varied greatly even among the same maunfacturer. Often they cost just a few dollars new and just about any machine shop could (and did) turn them out when business was slow. I'd be happy with a mint S&W but why bother? Get a Webley MKIV in 38S&W, its safer and priced about the same anyhow.
     
  25. Mike Irwin

    Mike Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,956
    Location:
    Below the Manson-Nixon line in Virginia...
    Damn, I can't tell you how many rounds of .32 and .38 S&W I've put through breaktop guns by S&W, H&R, Iver Johnson, etc., over the past 25 years...

    Never had one go up in my hand...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page