Questions about lever rifles. Does anyone know the difference in drop between these two rounds at distances of 150yds or less? For short range hunting of small whitetails, is there really any appreciable advantage to shooting a 444?
No, think of the .444 Marlin as a .44 Magnum X 2..................Think of the .444 as a 30-30 on steroids.
Kind of my thoughts exactly, they are both in .45-70...............get the 444 lever gun, then get a 444 BFR. then they will match and you will be shooting the ballisticly superior cartridge. the side arm might be a little unwieldy though.
I wouldn't consider a .444 BFR a "sidearm".
I carried a 66oz 3rd Model Dragoon all last season in a belt holster. I did just fine with it but most people don't want that much sixgun on their hip. I carried it because I wanted to carry it, not because it was the best tool for the job. The only .444 listed by MRI is a 10" model and it weighs 77oz. You may certainly carry one if you want, hell, you can carry two if it pleases you. IMHO, a 10" revolver that weighs nearly five pounds defies the meaning of "sidearm". You really need a scope for it to do anything more than a 5½" - 7½" will. Makes no sense when a 37oz .44Spl or 45oz .44Mag will serve the same purpose without unnecessary weight.I think people are too quick to dismiss the BIG REVOLVERS...
A lot of shenanigans in their marketing. Clearly the recoil results are mainly a result of them being huge and weighing a ton and not the pressure. In the case of the .450 you have a 4.5 pound monster with almost as much recoils as the 3.25 pound Freedom Arms. I wasn't aware that the .454 was underpowered for anything on this side of the planet. I also doubt many .454s get wore out. You can use .45 Colt ammo for blasting.The Magnum Research BFR in .450 Marlin is the most powerful production handgun on the market today !.................
http://www.magnumresearch.com/BFR-Factoids.aspBFR .45/70 recoils less than all of the above guns including the lowly .44 Magnum with a 4 5/8-inch barrel. The advantages of the .45/70 over the .454 Casull are that the .45/70 is an extremely potent hunting cartridge that is loaded at EXTREMELY low pressures. The Casull is loaded at over 50,000 PSI and the .45/70 is loaded under 25,000 PSI. The .45/70 can be hand-loaded to exceed .454 Casull velocity and still be under 30,000 PSI! There is the big advantage. Much less recoil and half the working pressure means the guns will shoot better and last longer. Ammo is also a lot less expensive and more readily available. THE LONG .45/70 CARTRIDGE DOES NOT MEAN MORE RECOIL IT MEANS MUCH LESS PRESSURE BECAUSE THE POWDER HAS MORE ROOM TO EXPAND, GIVING EQUAL PERFORMANCE WITH LESS PRESSURE.
Think of the .444 as a 30-30 on steroids.
Actually, its probably easier to think of it as a slightly younger cousin of the .45-70.No, think of the .444 Marlin as a .44 Magnum X 2..................
In the mid-1960s the .45-70 had all but disappeared from the American marketplace. There was no big-bore cartridge available in a lever-action rifle in current production, so Marlin decided to create a new cartridge to fill this empty niche. They created what is essentially an elongated version of the .44 Magnum by making it nearly an inch longer to give it power similar to the .45-70. The case Marlin created is very similar to the rimmed .303 British that was trimmed and necked-up to work with .429 bullets.............Actually, its probably easier to think of it as a slightly younger cousin of the .45-70.
.444 w/300gr = 2000FPS/2665FP
.45-70 w/300gr = 2,069FPS/2852FP
If you hand load, the .45-70 definitely has the advantage with heavier loads and heavier bullets, but with typical factory loads they are pretty close.
Use the right bullets and the .444 will give the .45-70 a run for its money.If you hand load, the .45-70 definitely has the advantage with heavier loads and heavier bullets, but with typical factory loads they are pretty close.
Absolutely not.I think a .444 wil shot a 44 mag.