.44 special 255 gr hard cast enough for woods carry?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 18, 2019
Messages
20
Location
Northeastern PA
Hi all,

I am relatively new member to The High Road Forums and while I've lurked in the background reading posts for several months this is my first attempt at actually starting a thread. I am an avid hunter and fisherman in Northeast PA and spend as many days in the outdoors as possible. My inquiry comes from two recent (2017 & 2019) encounters with black bears whilst small game hunting for which I use a 410 bore shotgun or 22lr bolt action rifle. On both occassions, the bears did not run in the opposite direction as many have in the past. After much yelling, making lots of racket and making myself appear larger the bears did not back off and were within 15 yards of me. It wasn't until I fired a shot in the opposite direction of the bear (to make more noise that I was capable of) did the bears eventually scamper away on both occassions. Last year's (2019) was particularly troublesome as I did see what I thought was the same bear about a half hour but thankfully he did not approach for a second time. It made me feel extremely uneasy. We have some large black bears up here in PA some of which get over 500lbs. I estimated this bear to be in the 300lb range though I am no field judging expert.

While both hunting and fishing I have carried a ruger flattop 44 special loaded with 200 grain hard cast wadcutter(chono'd at 1,080fps avg) from underwood ammo for self defense from 2 legged predators. I feel comfortable with this load for that purpose should the need arise. However, my last encounter with the black bear has left me wondering if this round is enough or if I should move up to Underwood's 255 grain hard cast 44 special load which I chronographed at 1,065fps from my 4.625 blackhawk. Then I got wondering if the 255 grain load would even be enough assuming my shot placement is accurate? Please note that I do have a S&W 629-6 44 mag but I am still practicing with 44 mag loads (it's been about 1 year) and don't feel comfortable using it for woods carry with the high power ammo without more practice. A man's got to know his limitations right?

I was hoping to get some practical input on these particular loads in 44 special. I dont want to turn this into a grizzly bear attack discussion or a black bear hunting discussion. I am not in grizzly country and I dont plan on hunting black bears. I was simply wondering that if in the off chance I become the rare statistic would the ammo do it's part if I do mine? Your input is appreciated in advance.
 
I carry a similar setup in your neck of the woods and am confident in my choice. Will it stop a close range charge, depends on the hit. I hope to never find out.
 
I would be comfortable with either load on black bears. And I have been face to face with one of those 500lb monsters. They are big, but they aren't armored. That said, the hardcast will probably penetrate a little better.
 
I have hunted with a 255 Keith bullet at 950 FPS from a 5.5" .44 Special. It always has worked, but never has resulted in an instantaneous stop. I would not feel helpless if called upon to use it in defense against a bear, but would not expect it to perform miracles either.
 
Similar situation in the Michigan U.P.
While Grouse hunting with a 20 gauge I pack a Smith mountain gun in .45 Colt, have packed a 629 with full house loads but recoil was to much for quick second shots. After much experimentation I finally settled on a Cast Performance 265gr LFNGC bullet over 8.7gr. of Universal Clays for 850/900 fps. Very accurate with a fast recovery rate.
 
Hi PA Revolver Guy, glad you decided to post! I have the same Ruger that you have and I wouldn't hesitate to carry it into bear woods. I also have the Blackhawk in .45 Colt and either in my opinion will make a Black Bear change his mind.
 
While salmon in AK, my brother carried my 624 4" loaded with the warm Buffalo Bore 255 gr SWCs. At the time, neither one of us had a compact "all weather" big-bore magnum.

He didn't lose any sleep and caught a lot of fish.

That’s fine until you need it.
 
I am not an expert on black bears, but a load of 255 LSWC's and 7.5 grains Unique did leave my 5.5" Lipsey's Ruger Flat top just at 1000 fps. It is a very powerful round, and I have more faith in heavy bullets moving fast, for deep penetration, than light bullets moving fast.
 
It sounds like you're comfortable with your Blackhawk .44 Special, so IMHO that should be the firearm you carry.

I have but one example of a load similar to the Buffalo Bore load to which you refer (255 gr. SWC @ ~1050 fps). A few years ago I took a raking shot on a buck with a .44 Special with a home-cast 258 gr. SWC that struck the buck in the left flank at about 1050 fps, travelled the length of his body, struck a bone somewhere along the way(see photo), and came to rest under the skin at the juncture of the right shoulder and the neck.

69Wys3Z.jpg

EfCJPJy.jpg

Not a black bear, I know, but still that's about 30" or so of penetration. Brian Pearce wrote a really good article on the .44 Special in which he mentions some of his kills with the cartridge.

Evidently you're not a handloader. A .44 Special such as your Blackhawk can quite easily be handloaded to "standard" .44 Magnum levels; i.e. a 250-ish gr. SWC at 1200 fps. I've tested such loads in my Flat Top Blackhawk and they were quite accurate out to 100 yds. If you foresee carrying your .44 Special in these situations in the future you might consider getting an inexpensive set up to load .44 Special; that is a hand press, a set of used dies and a cheap set of scales. Such a set up would probably cost half what a box of Buffalo Bore .44 Special ammunition costs.

35W
 

Attachments

  • bullet_zpsd62d630c.jpg
    bullet_zpsd62d630c.jpg
    102.1 KB · Views: 11
  • 44-250KT2_zpsd9b41e59.jpg
    44-250KT2_zpsd9b41e59.jpg
    91.9 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
You wouldn’t want a 9mm where I hunt black bear. Not all black bear are created equally.
Hits with a 9mm beat misses with a 44. Carry what you are comfortable using and accurate with. Not saying I would roam around with a 22. I guess it's better then nothing.
 
Based upon your parameters - you'll likely be just fine. Most especially if you are comfortable shooting that load accurately.

I've gone one or two less MANY times in the form of semi-wadcutters in .41s and .44 Sp. Felt just fine and most especially as it was already proven to me as a hunter on big hogs, deer, feral dogs and the like.

Todd.
 
Last edited:
Hits with a 9mm beat misses with a 44. Carry what you are comfortable using and accurate with. Not saying I would roam around with a 22. I guess it's better then nothing.

Well, if you choose a .44 you have an obligation to yourself to be competent with it or you shouldn’t carry it.

Would you hunt black bear with a 9mm? Why then would it be a good choice to stop an attack?? While I will always agree that it’s better to have something over nothing, it’s still an important choice if it’s meant to save your hide or those of your loved ones.
 
Well, if you choose a .44 you have an obligation to yourself to be competent with it or you shouldn’t carry it.

Would you hunt black bear with a 9mm? Why then would it be a good choice to stop an attack?? While I will always agree that it’s better to have something over nothing, it’s still an important choice if it’s meant to save your hide or those of your loved ones.
Wouldn't hunt bear with my Glock 19. I do carry it when I'm not up to carrying my 44 in the woods. It's not the best. 16 rounds of 9mm will stop them. With the right bullet selection. I do not have the article at hand. But remember reading about killing a charging bear with 9mm in Alaska. I'll try to dig it up.
 
I managed to put a nose shaped depression in a 4" rifle rated plate (ok cheap champion, but still) with 240MBC hard cast using the Skeeter load, which i havent chronoed, from my 5" gp100. Nothing left an impression you could feel in the plate, multiple 9mm hits, and a couple jhp .44mags......
I've got zero experience with bear, and likely never will, but that loads easy to shoot from my medium sized revolver, and I'd be more confident with that then many a lighter cartridge. I actually do carry that revolver pig hunting but haven't had a chance/need to use it yet.
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't hunt bear with my Glock 19. I do carry it when I'm not up to carrying my 44 in the woods. It's not the best. 16 rounds of 9mm will stop them. With the right bullet selection. I do not have the article at hand. But remember reading about killing a charging bear with 9mm in Alaska. I'll try to dig it up.

That was Phil Shoemaker and the bear was running towards his client and not charging him. You can bet he wouldn’t have wanted that mouse gun had the bear charged him. That incident doesn’t make the 9mm a good bear gun irrespective of the type/size of the bear.
 
That works awesome for
Teeny things.

Oh I’m not going there. All I’m going to say is that I shot a 450 pounder in North Carolina a number of years ago right between the shoulder blades with my .500 Maximum (525 grain WLN at 1,350 fps) and it still ran off about 150 yards before piling up and conceding defeat. In other words, he still had plenty left to kill me had he been inclined. Just sayin’...

Bears (of any sort) aren’t whitetail and they aren’t feral hogs...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top