45-70 govt vs 500 smith and wesson

Status
Not open for further replies.
The leverguns are gaining in popularity here quite a bit with the curve rising quickly.
I have heard similar rumors myself.

Speaking of "here", if I might be a little nosy: where is here and why are you there (I was guessing military service...due to the "Under my cover and in my boots Currently somewhere in Afrika" location). Feel free to not answer if you are not comfortable with the question.

:)
 
also as I staited in an earlier post I have a restomod '74 DodgeCharger (850hp,20mpg fwy)that was built for far less than the Euro Super cars it beats regularly but the folks that buy them like a certain "look".

Be careful there....I love American muscle but......perform better in what sense?? Straight line??? What about on a track?? Top Speed?? Handling?? Brakes??

A little Lotus Elise (with a puny 200 HP, Honda 4 Cyl engine) asswhipped a Mustang 500 GT real good on a track and a mountain road.

However a Corvette Z06 (one of the very few real American exotic with the Viper, the GT-40 and the Saleen S7) can beat on a track a Ferrari 430 for less than 1/3 the cost....
 
Maverick


However the hydrostatic shock theory has never been proven and it is object of active debate.

I agree about the "marketing" and perception aspect of the African safari equipment market...given the cost for the trip, the equipment makers can be a bit heavy handed in pricing.

When it comes to cats, many experience African hunters (including the South African former owner of my beautiful sporterized Mauser 98 in 30-06), especially the ones that live in that part of the world, agree that the 375 H&H minimum requirement for cats is ridiculous.

Countless numbers have been dispatched very effectively with the good old 303 British and the 270 Winchester decades ago was considered adequate lion medicine. Many love the 7mm Rem Mag for Simba.
 
Last edited:
When it comes to cats, many experience African hunters (including the South African former owne of my beautiful sporterized Mauser 98 in 30-06), especially the one that live in that area, agree that the 375 H&H minimum requirement for cats is ridiculous. Countless numbers have been dispatched very effectively with the good old 303 British and the 270 Winchester decades ago was considered adequate lion medicine. Many love the 7mm Rem Mag for Simba.
I have heard likewise...but the good ole '06 also has enough velocity to have hydrostatic shock...so I guess you can say: if it is a marketing ploy, or a figment of someones imagination, I'm buying (for dangerous game). As Weatherby said: "speed kills"...although he did go a little crazy on just about all of his magnum cartridges IMO.

I do not claim to be an expert on the subject, nor have all of the answers, I know a little about dangerous game (mostly hearsay and testing) but in the end I am just as opinionated as anyone else...right or wrong, I like what I like. :)
 
Saturno---Quite right,it does all depend.My charger uses Bear 6 pistons on the front 4 piston on the rear 13" both ends.No longer uses torsion bars,now coilovers,etc. Coatings on engine internals,twin turbo,426 hemi that is TPSEFI,5spd out of a '91 Toyota Turbo Supra(Auzzies and Kiwis swear by them and it has been living behind this motor for 15,000+ miles),3" dual exhaust with x-pipe,Aero mufflers and electric cut-outs to the resonators,51/49 front/back weight dis.Mini tubs to frame,subframed,caged,275r17 front,315r17 rears...'71 RT louverd powerbulge hood,'71 RT tailights,'71 inset side marker lights,Semi Flat Black with Custom Gloss Black Super Bee stripes.Black leather and aluminum interior. All work except engine coatings done by me and my freinds.Lambos are in my dust regardless...Lotus in the slalomn they can beat me but not often...I love to drive!!!:evil:
 
Last edited:
Interesting story Wanna B...I have considered taking an Civil Engineering job overseas to help fund my hobbies (mainly the gun collection)...but am indecisive and have not found the right position.

:)
 
Saturno V said:
Where is the link to the Garrett article??

However a US Forest Service study about effectiveness of rifle rounds against big bears placed the 458 WM and the 460 Wby at the top and the 45-70 at position #17

http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/gtr152.pdf

There is no way in the world that if you take two identical undeformable bullets .45 cal of the same weight, the faster one will penetrate less...never ever.

Respectfully,

I'd ask that you refer to page 13 of the article that you just linked us to, then reconsider the portion of your post that I highlighted! I have to admit that this is news to me, as I always sort of assumed that faster bullets would penetrate deeper, all else being equal.

But, I read the article you linked me to, and on page 13 of that article they state in the first paragraph of the center column:

"In general we found that bullet penetration decreased as striking velocity increased."
 
In general we found that bullet penetration decreased as striking velocity increased."

Yes because, if you read the report, they used soft point bullets not solids...mystery solved...:)
 
Yah,sometimes ya' just gota' jump in and do it,see if its for you or not.
We will see...but I don't believe I am not ready to commit to it presently.

USFS Article said:
In general we found that bullet penetration decreased as striking velocity increased.
saturno_v said:
they used soft point bullets not solids...mystery solved...
Interesting, however this was not the case with respect to the trapdoor .45-70 loads; however, I believe it would be completely different if they had used a more powerful loading with a heavy solid slug.

:)
 
The solids we used on the elephants(dead already),did not deform,any of them.So I do not know how to make it any clearer...there is a "sweet spot" for speed and penetration.

So...just got word from a freind of mine back in the states.He used my FN Muaser .460Wby and his Marlin 1895 Cowboy. Both using 500gr. solids against two blocks of ballistic gel,one each,18"x18"x6'.

Both made it all the way thru',end to end!!...drum roll...
The 460Wby had a much larger balloon to the wound channel at first but tapered of quickly to near bullet diameter at exit.
The .45-70 had a narrower ballon but was sustainded nearly unchanged thru' till the softball sized exit.
 
All right I was actually studying some stuff for work and have deliberately been trying to avoid wasting any time on the net. But now you rotten SOB's have gone and done it and I am going to have to waste some time!:D;)

So here's my take on this.

First off the original question the S&W .500 vs .45-70. The hottest load I can find for a .500 S&W is the 440 gr Corbon @1625 FPS That's a pretty hot pistol round no doubt. And it's a pistol round. Like all handgun rounds it suffers from a severe lack of powder capacity and it will never be a pimple on a center fire rifle rounds behind.

Does that mean that the S&W .500 out of a rifle wouldn't be a cool little blaster that would be perfectly awesome for close range hog and even black bear hunting? No it doesn't not in the least. But whoever said that the .500 S&W would be a better choice for African dangerous game needs to drop his crack pipe and proceed directly to the nearest rehab center. The .500S&W on dangerous game is a stunt. The round even out of a rifle is hard pressed to make 3,000 Ftlbs at the muzzle (very hard pressed) not mention the 4,000 ft lbs required for thick skinned DG hunting in almost every African country that allows hunting. And it is highly recommended that you use a bullet that has a minimum sectional density of .300 or greater. And that brings us to the fabled and often spoken of .45-70.


Here are the facts.. Did you guys ever used to watch Saturday Night Live when they had the skit called "the gay, communist, gun club"? The shtick was to get into the club you had to gay, a communist and like shooting guns, no exceptions allowed. Well in Africa there is a another club kind of like that but it is called minimum legal requirements to hunt thick skinned dangerous game. And to play in that club you must have the following prerequisites no exceptions allowed.

1. A minimum bore diameter of .375. Or in Zimbabwe 9.3mm (.366).

2. A minimum muzzle energy of 4,000 Ftlbs at the muzzle or in Zimbabwe 3950Ftlbs.

That's it, pretty simple huh?

Now lets see if our fabled .45-70 is able to join the club

1. Bore diameter .458..Check!

2. Minimum muzzle energy of 4,000 Ftlbs..Whoopps!!

Even the hottest Garret loads don't make it.

Now I know we are going to jump all over me because of the penetration issue. Yes the .45-70 with heavy hard cast loads penetrates very well. Yes there has been a number of African DG taken with it. Yes those who did it were doing so illegally except for Mr. Vince Luppo who did his amazing feats inside a high fenced game farm in South Africa:rolleyes: which made it legal to hunt with his .45-70. And yes the .45-70 is capable of cleanly killing a variety of DG with the right loads as is a .50 Cal muzzle loader based on the same principles.

The .45-70 however can not be relied on to adequately penetrate on a frontal brain shot on a BULLelephant as has been proven by several PH's who shoot a lot of elephant . Which makes it a very marginal weapon to carry in real life no BS DG country.

Randy Garret sells ammo in particular he sells .45-70 ammo he has a vested interest in promoting his product, keep that in mind when you read his "scientific" studies. For years people have been touting the test where his 530 gr HC out penetrated a .416 Rigby. Of course the .416 was using a soft point expanding bullet. The other thing that Mr. Garret conveniently likes to leave out is that often the faster round haven't stopped penetrating rather they've left the medium earlier IE they went off course and exited. And in those tests it's usually a round nosed bullet verses a flat nosed in the .45-70.

I've personally seen a round nosed Woodleigh 400 gr out of a .416 Rigby enter the hind quarter of a big bull cape buff smash the hip and exit out the throat. Is that enough penetration for you?

In a .458 Lott I've personally shot buff up the rear and found the round nosed solid bullet under the skin of the neck. That's a good solid eight to ten feet of penetration. a .470 NE does about the same. the last buffalo I shot with a .470 I hit with a 500 gr X Bullet in the on shoulder I found that bullet under the skin in the opposite hip.

There was a test done on a device called the iron buffalo. It is series of Plywood boards inter spaced with water compartments. In that medium which is set up to more closely approximate the density of heavy animal tissue and bone the higher velocity .458's with similar solids in similar shapes absolutely smoked the lower velocity .45-70 rounds. The frontal brain shot tests on a wet big bull elephant skulls with the .45-70 tend to bear this out.

In summary here's my take on the .45-70 on Dg issue. First off the myths.

"The .45-70 in a modern loading can nearly approximate the .458 WM"

B.S! The .45-70 with a 400 gr load can get close to what a .458WM will do with a 500 grload apples and oranges guys. The .458 WM is an honest 5,000 ftlb round a true stopper. the .45-70 can eek out an energy level somewhere in the mid to high 3,000 range and with total thermo nuclear load in a Ruger Number one you can just get it to edge 4,000Ftlbs with a 400gr bullet which of course is seriously lacking the SD needed for true reliability on DG. With a 500gr bullet a .45-70 can't carry a .458's panties to the laundry. Not even close.

"The .45-70 will out penetrate a higher velocity .458 mag"

B.S again all of the "tests" have been either a solid with a square nosed profile out of the .45-70 verses a soft point expander in the .458 mag or it's been with round nosed bullet. And it's been in a medium that would benefit from lower velocity like wet paper or water cans not one that truly tests the bullets ability to penetrate a medium that replicates the structure of an animal like an elephant. To really get a true test of penetration the following needs to be done. A series of bullets needs to be fired into a variety of mediums. The bullets need to be of similar shape a construction and the shooters need to be non biased and competent so that one round isn't accidentally started off at slight angle to skew the data. If one round does veer off and exit that needs to be taken into account and either re fired or found to see why it did so.


I've killed a lot of game with .45-70's with all kinds of bullets from Garret loads to regular old Remington 405 gr soft points. The .45-70 is a smasher on lighter game no two ways about it. Even on heavy game it is a very efficient killer with the right loads. But in my experience it doesn't even come close to the effect that a true heavy like a .470NE has on game. A .470NE hitting a big feral hog is a sight to behold it hits with extreme authority it absolutely crushes them to the ground. A .45-70 with the hottest loads simply doesn't have the same smack.

Here's something for you to mull over, I can always load my .470NE or my .458 Lott down to 1500 fps with a 500 gr bullet but can never in your wildest dreams load your .45-70 up 600 to 800 FPS to match my .458 Lott.

In closing is the .45-70 capable of killing DG? Of course it is so is a .303 or an 8MM or whatever given the perfect situation. Is the .45-70 a true DG caliber? Not only no but not in your wildest dreams should it be considered as a serious choice in DG country and in particular in elephant country. I have never met or do I know of any DG PH's who would carry one professionally as a stopping rifle with clients present. That statement does not include several South African game farm PH's who carry them, once again apples and oranges.

There you go that's my take on it.

PS

Do I have a problem with anyone hunting DG or carrying a .45-70 in DG country. Nope not in the least. It's your dime it's your time go knock yourself out. And if you really want to try it out go do it then come back and tell me all about it until then it's just a comic version of the truth.
 
Last edited:
Excellent!!

Quite true the rounds we used were round nose.They were solids tho'...no idea how much of a difference the round nose makes tho'.

Not sure how wet paper or water barrels favors one or the other but more than open to in put.

That Iron Buffalo sounds great. I will set myself to making some.

I do not feel biased in favor of the .45-70,tho' I do beleave it very capable...much like .308Win. is too elk,bear,moose. My personal favorite is .416 Rigby...I have a soft spot for .416 Taylor as it was my first "African" chambered weapon.
 
My thing at this point is what are the true penetration capabilities of these cartridges. Not jumping on you about this,just realy want to know.

No doubt the others mentioned are more powerful...wound chanel in ballistic gell.

Interesting "club"...certainly the PH would have the anchor to back up the client.


Sorry about the spotty/random replies.
 
Velocity has everything to do with pressure.
Nope. It has something to do with pressure. "Everything" implies a 1:1 relationship that's just not there. Yes, ALL things being equal more pressure=more velocity. However, things are very rarely ever equal.
 
My thing at this point is what are the true penetration capabilities of these cartridges.

Wanta b,

Don't worry about jumping on me I'm used to it.;) And I sure don't take it that way I enjoy your coherent and well written response.

Here is an interesting outcome form the elephant carcass penetration test.



Posted 30 October 2009 09:51 Hide Post
Michael,

If you look at my reported results with 450gr FN North Forks and 500gr RN Woodleighs on elephant heads and bodies, which we have discussed before, you will note that the Woodleigh is loaded to higher portential than the NF. The heavier Woodleigh has more enregy as well, but the NF out penetrates it by something on order of your observed 35%. I can't accurately calculate the % difference I've observed since so many NF's exit that it skews results downward.

My requirements for solids is for them to get where they need to go, regardless of what they must penetrate. After they get to where they must go, I am not too concerned about the rest of their trip, though more straight line penetration is favorable. That is why I use Woodleighs for first shots on eles. I have never recovered one with nose damage, so I am confident that they will breach the bone they must on brain shots. Not so with NF's. I have recovered NF's with divoted noses and I know one veered, albeit mildly - maybe 8" over about 54", with most curve being in the last 2' of penetration. Nevertheless, I fear the veer!, even though I know that FN's will provide significantly greater penetration. Veering on a second shot to the heart or lungs is close to irrelevant since the target is so very large and penetration at a premium for these second and subsequent shots, which may be at some considrable quartering away angle.

On bullet length, think boats. The longer the waterline length, the faster a boat will go given the same power, up to a point. Then weight and friction will intervene. On the other hand, the longer a bullet the more spin it need to remain stable in air to flesh transition. GS Custom's web site has much on this topic worth reading. Same shape bullets, etc, etc, with different results. For their bullets shorter is better down to a point, and then physics and SD take over.

As for velocity, your observations contradict mine, but mine are more limited because the velocities I have used are within a tigher boundary. For, say, the 500gr 458 Woodleigh RN, increasing velocity from ~2025fps or so to ~2145fps makes a world of difference in penetration.

Also, according to others who report their results on eles, the increase in penetration for the same bullets is significant when you jump from ~2100fps to 2300fps.


Common sense tells me that early disipation of energy from a higher velocity bullet cannot alter the performance of the bullet once its energy has dropped to that reflective of the impact velocity of the slower bullet - assuming like bullets. So, a bullet raveling at, say, 2400fps strikes the target and begins to penetrate. It is also disipating energy faster than a slower bullet would by displacing more non permanent wound channel tissue. But it slows to the velocity of the second, slower bullet at impact. The second bullet and the first will behave exactly the same from the point where they have eqaul velocity, but the first bullet will already have penetrated some distance. The faster bullet will ALWAYS penetrate further, all else being equal, including stabilization at transition, which naturally favors the faster bullet.

Also, FWIW, flat noses, at least truncated cone flat noses, favor velocity, with apparently non-linear gains in penetration reflected as velocity increases. At least that is my take. Not enough comparative data to be sure. Seems to be one reason lighter, faster but less energy potential possessing flat noses out penetrate heavier more enegry potential possessing RN's. Like my Woodleigh 500's vs my NF 450's.

JPK
 
Quick thought on flat vs. round...could it be that the flatnose "grabs" tissue more effectively,then,as with hollow points, an umbrella of sorts is created that directs the tissue farther to the sides and out of the way,of the projectile.There by allowing a truer,farther penetration track do to less deflection at impact and less drag during bysection? Where as with a round nose,if not straight on has more deflection at impact,then rapidly less and more drag on the sides of the projectile due to the tissue "slipping" around it?:scrutiny:
 
Last edited:
Wanta,

Yeah pretty much my take on it and it's been shown that wide meplate flat nose bullet penetrate better than round nosed and like to be pushed faster.
 
All right I was actually studying some stuff for work and have deliberately been trying to avoid wasting any time on the net. But now you rotten SOB's have gone and done it and I am going to have to waste some time!
Glad I could help. :p

But whoever said that the .500 S&W would be a better choice for African dangerous game needs to drop his crack pipe and proceed directly to the nearest rehab center.
Hehehe...so you're saying that it WOULDN'T be your first choice for a bull elephant? :confused: :evil:

2. Minimum muzzle energy of 4,000 Ftlbs..Whoopps!!
My loads get close...but still wouldn't dream of using it (300gr. at about 2400fps), way too light/SD for my taste.

Here's something for you to mull over, I can always load my .470NE or my .458 Lott down to 1500 fps with a 500 gr bullet but can never in your wildest dreams load your .45-70 up 600 to 800 FPS to match my .458 Lott.

In closing is the .45-70 capable of killing DG? Of course it is so is a .303 or an 8MM or whatever given the perfect situation. Is the .45-70 a true DG caliber? Not only no but not in your wildest dreams should it be considered as a serious choice in DG country and in particular in elephant country. I have never met or do I know of any DG PH's who would carry one professionally as a stopping rifle with clients present. That statement does not include several South African game farm PH's who carry them, once again apples and oranges.

Common sense tells me that early disipation of energy from a higher velocity bullet cannot alter the performance of the bullet once its energy has dropped to that reflective of the impact velocity of the slower bullet - assuming like bullets. So, a bullet raveling at, say, 2400fps strikes the target and begins to penetrate. It is also disipating energy faster than a slower bullet would by displacing more non permanent wound channel tissue. But it slows to the velocity of the second, slower bullet at impact. The second bullet and the first will behave exactly the same from the point where they have eqaul velocity, but the first bullet will already have penetrated some distance. The faster bullet will ALWAYS penetrate further, all else being equal, including stabilization at transition, which naturally favors the faster bullet.
Makes perfect sense when (and only when) using SOLIDs...which I would bet any amount of money the studies I have read did not do...making it a moot point, as expanding rounds are of limited or no use on large, dangerous game (at least to me).

One final question, H&H: I am getting ready to purchase a .375H&H and in the next month or so (when my gunsmith has the time to perform the work) rechamber my falling block .45-70Govt. to .45-120NE (should drive a 450gr. solid to a minimum of approx. 2400fps)...what projectiles would you recommend for each (for dangerous game)?

The ones that I have picked out so far are as follows: Woodleigh 350gr. RN FMJ and/or Barnes Banded Solid FN (wide meplat) 300gr. for the .375H&H; and 450gr. Barnes Banded Solids FN (wide meplat) 450gr. for the .45-120NE. Does this look about right to you...or would you recommend a Woodleigh RN FMJ for both?

H&H, thank you so much for joining in...it has been very informative and was well worth disturbing your slumber. :p
 
Quick thought on flat vs. round...could it be that the flatnose "grabs" tissue more effectively,then,as with hollow points, an umbrella of sorts is created that directs the tissue farther to the sides and out of the way,of the projectile.There by allowing a truer,farther penetration track do to less deflection at impact and less drag during bysection? Where as with a round nose,if not straight on has more deflection at impact,then rapidly less and more drag on the sides of the projectile due to the tissue "slipping" around it?
Pretty much my understanding is that a FN projectile with a wide meplat crushes the tissue with authority rather than simply pushing through it, this is caused by cavitation at the nose of the bullet.

:)
 
The 4,000 ft.lbs is a "road block" for the 45-70...no matter the bullet weight, it maxes out at around 3,600 ft. lbs.
Hodgdon's data maxes out at 4200 ft.lbs for "Modern Rifles" and 3,900 ft. lbs for Lever Actions.
 
Thats about right...like I said "around" 3,600 ft. lbs. (referring to lever actions).

I expect a hot loaded Marlin Cowboy could make the 4,000 mark with the right load.

I say 3,600 because I like to keep my loads (per Hodgdens site) to around 38,000 cup (which is about 40,000 psi... a bit under the MAX for a margin of safety))
 
One final question, H&H: I am getting ready to purchase a .375H&H and in the next month or so (when my gunsmith has the time to perform the work) rechamber my falling block .45-70Govt. to .45-120NE (should drive a 450gr. solid to a minimum of approx. 2400fps)...what projectiles would you recommend for each (for dangerous game)?

M223,

You really can't go wrong with any of the choices you've already mentioned. In my .375H&h I use 300gr Barnes TSX and BBS. IN the .450-120 the same in a .450 Gr choice would be great as would any selection from North Fork, Woodleigh Swift A-frame ETC ETC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hodgdon's data maxes out at 4200 ft.lbs for "Modern Rifles".

Gryffydd,

I know that you can just edge 4,000 Ft lbs in a 400 gr bullet with a Ruger #1 or Siamese Mauser. Of course the 400 gr projectile is well under the 300 SD recommended as a minimum. The problem comes when you step up to a 450 or 500 grain bullet. A 400 gr bullet is way to light o be counted on with thick skinned heavy boned DG. The poor old .45-70 just doesn't have enough case capacity to push those bullet at enough velocity to make the numbers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Here is a wake up call. Some of the most experienced elephant hunters on the planet who regularly back up clients on elephant in thick cover all recommend a .50 cal or larger firing a 570gr bullet or larger at over 2,000 FPS. Johan Calitz uses a .500 NE, Ivan Carter uses a .577, Jeff Rand uses a .577 for dedicated elephant work. They all say that if you are in a really big jam with a elephant at close range these is the power level required to turn an elephant with a missed brain head shot. Most agree that the various .458's and .470 class rifles are to light and don't deliver enough thump to relied on at close quarters with big bull elephant. This of course is for sport hunting culling is an entirely different mind set.

I don't want you guys to read this and think that I am the final authority on any of this stuff. These are just my observations and the information I am throwing out there is for your enjoyment and for the purpose of provoking thought and possibly increasing your knowledge data base when referring to this type of hunting. There are tons of different educated opinions out there non of which are definitively right or wrong there and that's what keeps the world an interesting place.:)

At the end of the day if you get into the shiz with a big dangerous critter you'd better have an adequate, dead reliable rifle and caliber combination capable of reaching the goods from any angle. that leaves a lot of options open guys. Have fun choosing and then have more fun becoming deadly instinctive with your chosen weapon. For me that is either a heavy caliber double or bolt gun. My primary DG rifles are a .470NE double a .404 Jeffery bolt and a .458 Lott.My Lott is on loan to a writer and I haven't seen it back in several years.:fire: I am also having a .450-400 double built as we speak and my back up "light" rifle in DG country is a .375H&H. Which is minimal yet adequate and legal for DG.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top