Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.45 acp Defensive Rounds Created Equal?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by CTGunner, Apr 24, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CTGunner

    CTGunner Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    934
    After doing a 500 round function test on a new 1911 using Speer Lawman FMJ 230 grain .45acp ammo I'm feeling confident that it's close to ready for everyday carry.

    My questions pertain to selecting a defensive load for a 1911:

    1. How many rounds of the defensive load do you recommend running through the gun before feeling confident in it for carry?

    2. I can't afford to function test the stuff that's going for almost a buck a round on any real scale beyond a few boxes...maybe I could swing a hundred rounds. On that note - I was able to pick up 300 rounds of Federal Classic JHP 230 grain ammo for a reasonable price. I'm hoping that if it functions well, this can be my everyday carry ammo...Is this ammo OK? What am I giving up by not going with the stuff that costs significantly more i.e. hydrashock and other equivalents etc.

    Unfortunately, the gun store guys were really of no help. Thanks for your input?
     
  2. KodiakBeer

    KodiakBeer member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,276
    Location:
    Kodiak, AK
    My only input is that I once shot a deer with a .45acp, 165 grain hydra-shok at 70 or 75 yards. It went down right there - just dropped straight down, kicked once and then was dead. The lungs were soup, the bullet stopped under the skin on the far side and was perfectly mushroomed and .8" inches in diameter.

    One shot is hardly a scientific sample, but it convinced me. I think 165 grain loads make a lot of sense. They have higher velocity and less recoil, so follow up shots are just that much quicker (not that I needed one in that case). To my way of thinking, the lighter rounds in .45 are like having the higher velocity of rounds like the .40, but with the added advantage of making bigger holes. I can't imagine any other round performing as perfectly as that hydra-shok did.

    As for the expense - hydra-shoks were designed to feed like ball ammo. I'd still function test them, but after that just practice with the Federal 165 grain ball ammo which is loaded to the same specs as the Hydra-shoks.

    Again, one shot is hardly definitive, but 165 grains is plenty of weight for any penetration you'd want, and higher velocity is always a good thing unless the recoil becomes prohibitive. In .45, the recoil drops with the lighter loads, so... what's the downside?
     
  3. Kwanger

    Kwanger Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    571
    I personally think that at the end of the day, a JHP is a JHP - and if you factor in cost, the fancy super expensive stuff just bankrupts you and offers little if any substantial improvement over "normal" JHP rounds.

    Functionwise, I'm generally happy after a few magazines worth.
     
  4. Vonderek

    Vonderek Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,433
    Nothing wrong with Federal Classic. I don't know where the 200 rounds of SD ammo thru the gun before the ammo is reliable thing got started. I just make sure each carry mag of a particular gun will feed a particular ammo with no hitches before trusting it.
     
  5. Mags

    Mags Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    3,235
    Location:
    Belgium
    My favorite 3 defensive loads for the 45 ACP is the 230 grain Gold Dot, 230 Grain Golden Sabres and the 185 grain Winchester Supreme Silver plated. The next 2 I prefer are the Federal Hi Shoks and Hydra Shoks in the 230 grain flavor. I tested 25 rounds of each and decided to "jungle load" the Golden Sabres and Winchester in my defensive mags.
     
  6. rbohm

    rbohm Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    tucson,az
    the nice thing about the .45acp round is that even in the standard ball round, it has good stopping power, without excessive penetration. pick your favorite hollow point that feeds reliably through you weapon, along with a couple of secondary favorites in case you cant fine your primary favorite round, and stock up.
     
  7. CTGunner

    CTGunner Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    934
    Thanks for your thoughts.
     
  8. Sharpie1

    Sharpie1 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    301
    Location:
    Virginia
    Back when it was readily available, I always bought the Winchester white box JHP ammo at Wal-mart for my defense handguns in 9mm and .45ACP. I bought it because it was reasonably priced which allowed me to practice with it as well. Even if there is a "better-performing" JHP cartridge than that, I'm not interested - since I won't be able to consistently practice with it. I shoot a lot - so, this way I am confident that I can shoot what I carry -and that my guns can feed what I buy.
     
  9. CTGunner

    CTGunner Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    934
    This was my logic in going with the Federal Classic. Glad I'm not totally alone on this.
     
  10. mljdeckard

    mljdeckard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,769
    Location:
    In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
    In the real world, I think that even the difference between FMJ and JHP ammo is limited. I tell people, use JHP ammo because handguns are too small to do the job at all, and you need all the advantages you can get, and premium JHP is an advantage, although I think that the actual real world difference may be small.

    As for how many rounds to test with, I always say 200, because this is the threshold of probability where you need to think about what the odds are that you will have a malfunction in a gunfight. Ideally, we should make it more like a thousand, but as you are finding, there is a practical limit to this. When you start spending more money on test ammo than you did on the gun itself, you have probably passed the threshold of practicality. If 100 is what you can do, do it. And yes, I think to a practical degree, classic Federal JHP ammo will simulate HSTs. Just remember that this is your life you're protecting here, and anything you can do to make it as real as possible is probably worth it. If you can't afford the 200 rd test now, put plans in place to do it as soon as possible.
     
  11. CTGunner

    CTGunner Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    934
    Thanks for your reply, it's really insightful and practical at the same time. Honestly, I feel like I'm already doing more than 80% of people who carry just by running the 500 round function test. Another 200 rounds of premium ammo is hard to swallow but your point is well taken. I will start with the Federal classic, see how it runs, and go from there. I'm finding out quickly that shooting, much like life in general, is all about prioritization...oh, and it isn't cheap.
     
  12. hinton03

    hinton03 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    538
    I put one full mag through each of my carry mags. I generally rotate 4 mags through as carry mags so that is 32 rounds. Most folks will say that isn't enough but I am satisfied with this procedure.
     
  13. Manco

    Manco Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    The common recommendation is 200 rounds, but if you plan to train on a fairly regular basis and already have confidence in the gun, then perhaps a box or two will suffice--if there are any issues with a particular load on an otherwise reliable gun, then they'll usually show up quickly enough.

    It should work fine, but in my opinion you would get more consistent performance from premium defensive ammo such as Federal HST, for example. In tests, budget JHPs (usually just older designs) tend to fail to expand more frequently than premium JHPs when passing through clothing, and some tend to fragment when passing through barriers or even just in the body sometimes. Some are better than others, and the current Federal Classic is actually pretty decent in the informal tests I've seen, although it is slightly but definitely outperformed by more modern (and expensive) JHPs, at least in tests.

    Some people would ask you whether you think your life is worth a few extra bucks, while others will say that the premium rounds offer nothing for their additional cost, but I think the truth is somewhere in between the two extremes. If you really don't think that you can afford something that is a little better, then the Federal Classic JHP should get the job done well enough. Oh, and personally I prefer that the primers and bullets are sealed to the case to help avoid contamination (especially when carried), so you might want to look into that regarding this load, but it's not strictly necessarily (just makes me feel better).

    .45 ACP and .40 S&W do tend to have similar velocities with similar bullet weights. Given that, obviously the .40 will penetrate more while the .45 will make larger holes. If the .45 gives you all the penetration that you need for game of a certain size, then it's ideal for that case, but it should be said that some hunters prefer complete penetration in order to get a clear blood trail (from the typically nasty exit wound) in case the deer does not drop immediately, and that in the general case some prefer to have a greater margin in case more bone and tough tissue must be penetrated (one shot indeed proves little), which 230 grain bullets should offer.

    It's too bad that .45 ACP FMJ bullets tend to be round-nosed as opposed to flat-nosed or truncated-cone like .40 S&W FMJ bullets, which more or less mimic JHPs.

    Some would say that the recoil of slower, heavier rounds is lower--it's all about individual perception. And choosing between different loads and calibers is all about what margins you're willing to accept. Even a .22 LR handgun can get the job done, no question about it, but larger, more powerful calibers give one a greater margin for success. Personally, I'd hate to find out that one of the bullets I fired during a shootout stopped just short of a bad guy's vital tissues just because it was too light and happened to pass through an arm or leg or beer belly first (some people are a lot bigger than a garden-variety deer). Within reason, I prefer my bullets to be able to punch all the way through at practically every conceivable angle, and then a little extra on top of that. Others disagree, sometimes vehemently, for their own reasons.

    That's not a bad idea, training with exactly the same load you use for defense. :cool: On the other hand, since I don't perceive that much difference between different loads in the same caliber with the same bullet weight, I choose to practice with even cheaper FMJ ammo and very little with my somewhat costly defensive ammo. Like I always say, we should do whatever we're most comfortable with as individuals, because at the end of the day, most of the things we enjoy discussing here really don't make that big of a difference in the grand scheme of things.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2010
  14. .45Heater

    .45Heater Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    67
    I didn't see it mentioned here but.... Ranger T Series feed really nice in all of my 1911's. The profile is pretty close to ball and the expansion looks great. That said, in a .45, as long as it feeds well, all will get it done. I do like some lower grain(180gr) in my 3" .45 to commensate for the lose of velosity out of the smaller barrel length.
     
  15. CDW4ME

    CDW4ME Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,034
    Location:
    No Mag Limit USA
    In 45 acp I would be fairly content with any JHP load that fed reliably and hit with the sights.
    I'm as guilty as anyone when it comes to wanting the "ultimate" load. I paid a hefty sum for a few boxes of Ranger "police only" ammo.
    The Ranger is good / superior ammo and produces the highest velocity of the 230 gr. bullets I tried, but my PM45 did not easily go into battery when loading the 1st round from the magazine; in contrast, Remington JHP fed like butter. The Ranger may be a "better" bullet, but I'll take reliable feeding over a slightly more tweaked bullet. I've got that pistol loaded with the "cheaper" ammo, because that's what the gun likes.
     
  16. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    They are not created equal as some loads are better than others, but there is not a lot of difference in "stopping power" between them either. Pick the one that feeds reliably in your gun. The latest fancy "high tech" load will do you no good stuck on the feed ramp. Two hundred rounds of every load is not really necessary, but it should get through at least four magazinefuls with the mags you will be carrying. I recommend one in the gun (obviously) and one spare. Since most defensive JHPs come in 20-round boxes, two boxes apiece should be sufficient.
     
  17. Ops Officer

    Ops Officer Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    169
    Location:
    Virginia
    Get the Issues Worked Out at the Range

    Most of my ammo for range is FMJ with the exception being the last couple of mags of JHP. Time spent on the range for functionality and familiarity reveal a lot about the ammo and the handgun. Some ammo won't feed very well in some of my guns. Hard primers account for some failures. Magazines sometimes present a problem, but I've culled out all that don't work well on my auto-loaders. Some ammo shoots high or low, depending on the gun. I try to get all this sorted out before I depend on a handgun for self defense. It only takes one issue for me to exclude a particular ammo or a handgun from use as a self defense weapon until I know I can fix the problem. A couple of hundred rounds usually is enough to tell the story. So far, I've never had a problem with Gold Dot, Ranger T, or Golden Saber. I limit ammo for home defense to standard pressure. Two handguns are rotated for home defense duty. They would be the last two I've taken to the range without experiencing an issue. Also, they could be a revolver or pistol, normally .45 ACP.

    So, that's the way I do it. If you have pushed 500 rounds of Lawman FMJ through your 1911 without an issue, you are good to go. BTW, I wouldn't have a problem using quality .45 ACP FMJ for self defense. It won't expand like JHP, but it won't contract either. A .45 ACP makes a pretty large hole and has a lot of mass for stopping power.
     
  18. Manco

    Manco Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    While I shoot ammo from a variety of manufacturers, I make sure to shoot at least some Speer Lawman or CCI Blazer during each session, since their handgun primers are said to be among the hardest. That way, if my gun's primer strikes are getting too light for whatever reason, I'll be able to detect it before it affects the use of my defensive ammo (which is currently from Winchester, so I shoot WWB to test primer ignition, as well).

    So do I since it more closely matches what I train with, and I prefer to limit blast and flash anyway for home defense purposes.
     
  19. KodiakBeer

    KodiakBeer member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,276
    Location:
    Kodiak, AK
    I'm not recommending the .45acp as a hunting round. I made a poor shot on a deer with a black powder rifle and it paused and looked back at me, so I put one out there with my .45 since I feared it would get away wounded before I could reload my smoke pole.

    I never did find another hole besides the .45 round through the ribs, so I obviously missed that first shot and the deer was just pausing to wonder about all the smoke and noise...

    I was just impressed with the instantaneous kill of that 165 grain hydra-shok - and I was only shooting that weight because the shop had been out of 230 grainers.

    Anyway, I started buying the federal ball in 165 grain, and carrying the 165 grain hydra-shoks for carry. The make a lot of sense on several levels - the reduced recoil makes double-taps much easier, and after seeing the performance on a living creature I have no doubt about the terminal effectiveness.

    I've shot deer with handguns - mostly .44 mags with flat-nosed slugs. You shoot them, it goes right through, the deer runs 20 or 30 yards and falls over. Very effective. The only instantaneous handgun kill I've ever seen is with that hydra-shok...
     
  20. Hatterasguy

    Hatterasguy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    1,604
    I'm cheap, and don't feel like spending a ton of money on hollow points. I just run good old 230gr FMJ, I know it works, and I know how it shoots.

    It works fine for the military.
     
  21. rbohm

    rbohm Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    tucson,az
    yes it does work fine for the military, but military's around the world are limited to fmj ball rounds. by treaty they are not allowed to use frangible rounds of any kind.
     
  22. CTGunner

    CTGunner Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    934
    Quick update - The Federal Classic worked pretty well. However, I did have a few (3) very random malfunctions today, double feeds, with the lawman. I kept shooting though and got through another 200 rounds, after the double feeds, without issue. By the end of the day I had 650 rounds total through the gun without cleaning. I'm feeling reasonably confident that 3 failures in 650 rounds is OK.
     
  23. Old Shooter

    Old Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,044
    Location:
    Virginia
    Yeah, If you get attacked by 650 bad guys and only 3 get thru I guess thats OK....

    Just kidding...

    I think I'll look around and see if I can find some of those 165 grain rounds, sounds like they might be worth looking into.
     
  24. sigsteve

    sigsteve Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    129
    Location:
    Chaska, MN. (Mpls)
    I'd say that the best thing you can get for a defensive load is going to be the Federal Hydra shok in 230gr. I've shot a few people with them and they stopped them pretty good. :D
     
  25. Tinman357

    Tinman357 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    212
    Location:
    Puget Sound
    SigSteve; Glad to hear that my choice of .45 stands up to a real world test. Sorry you had to test it though. I assume the BG deserved it and you rest easy with the choice. If so, Well done. If you don't rest easy then you at least have my understanding.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page