.45 gap?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I went to the range today and while sorting through my brass I found a few pieces of brass in that caliber. I'm curious what advantages is offers over the .45 ACP, why it was created and why anyone would buy it?
Local shop has second hand one in top shape with night sights for $450. If it's still there in few months I will try to buy it for <$400. My friend told me when one shoot such gun sparks fly out of ejection port. Kinda KOOL eh? Me wants one!:scrutiny: KOOLAID oh yeeeh....:D
 
My friend told me when one shoot such gun sparks fly out of ejection port. Kinda KOOL eh?
No, not cool at all. Sounds like very inefficient combustion at best, or the breech unlocking too early at worst.
 
If you don't like a Glock, then you haven't shot one.

Funny guy in the house! Yes I've shot Glocks and I don't care for them, grip is unnatural and I don't want to get used to a different grip that only ONE gun has.
 
Haha well I couldn't resist throwing that out there... the 1911 cultists do the same. I've read in a few other posts people saying well the 45 GAP is just Gaston Glock wanting a legacy, well even if that were the case you cannot deny that he and his company have drastically changed the way firearms are made, like it, love it or hate it, he deserves his place in history just like anyone else would. I mean Kalashnikov... Browning...
 
Single stack .45 ACP, we don't want a new cartridge, just a new gun.

Like the G36?

2808387090053667879S600x600Q85.jpg


6+1 single stacker. I'll take it (and did) over the .45 GAP any day.

Dan
 
Like the G36?



6+1 single stacker. I'll take it (and did) over the .45 GAP any day.





Yup, I've been saying it since I got mine; single stack thin and more shootable than the G23 I had.

One more time: The GAP .45 was designed to produce a more ergo friendly pistol and (b) it uses less materials than the .45 ACP but has slightly better ballistics. This has nothing to do with being a "fanboy" or in the "Fanbase". Simple facts, NOT opinions.
 
The poor sales on the Glock 36 is the resaon why Glock didn't proceed with making a full-sized single stack .45ACP Glock.
Glock sells more .45GAP pistols than the Glock 36.

Really? Cite/link the facts location please.

My facts come from a 20+ year Glock Instructor.
 
45 GAP Advantage

Assuming the same weight bullets, the only advantage the 45 GAP has over the 45 ACP is a bag of 500 weights a bit less and is therefore slightly easier to carry from my truck to the firing line of my gun club.
 
The 45 GAP was basically a solution in search of a problem. It went head to head with an American legend. Destine for failure. IMHO
 
I went to the range today and while sorting through my brass I found a few pieces of brass in that caliber. I'm curious what advantages is offers over the .45 ACP, why it was created and why anyone would buy it?
GAP - at least out of a Glock 37 I had a few years ago - was less recoil than 45acp and wickedly accurate + the gun can be about a 9mm size.

NY State Police and other PD use it - one female officer here had to shoot a felon - one shot and killed.

I think it's a great round - necessary? who knows.

I had to trade the gun though as I don't reload and the GAP got more expensive. Too Bad.

My experience anyway.
 
GAP - at least out of a Glock 37 I had a few years ago - was less recoil than 45acp and wickedly accurate + the gun can be about a 9mm size.

NY State Police and other PD use it - one female officer here had to shoot a felon - one shot and killed.

I think it's a great round - necessary? who knows.

I had to trade the gun though as I don't reload and the GAP got more expensive. Too Bad.

My experience anyway.
I would not pay near to retail for new one but second-hand in top shape at deep discount why not? Ammo is more expensive and harder to find then .45ACP but darn it looks like big bro of 9x18 and it's GAP chambered in Glock Perfection. Big plus imo.
 
I have avoided .45 GAP because of cost, but just checked Georgia-Arms, where I get a lot of ammo, and their price for 1000 rounds of .45 GAP (Canned Heat) is actually a little less than their price for .45 ACP. That caught me by surprise. ($330 vs $340.)

May cause me to reconsider .45 GAP.
 
Glock reps at the SHOT Show.

Oh for crap sake, I've heard more nonsense come from the SHOT Show than from a lot of internet gun sites...and that's saying something!

Dave
 
There is some horrible logic being employed in this thread by some.

The GAP is a shorter round with equal/slightly better ballistics than the ACP. That should be the END of the discussion. The GAP, as a technical matter, is superior to the ACP. You don't like that fact? Oh well.

People in this thread are introducing red herrings such as "Glock's 38 doesn't hold as many rounds as SA's XD 45 (ACP)!!!" What ridiculous logic.

This is how one should analyze the comparison: Hypothetically, if you take both the ACP and the GAP, then apply the most incredible, flawless engineering to a pistol platform built for both calibers, what are the results? The GAP will always be able to do what the ACP does, the ACP will NOT be able to do what the GAP does. You can fit a shorter round into a frame designed for a longer round, but you cannot do the opposite--especially in a perfectly engineered platform.

You want to discuss availability of ammo or pistols? That's a completely different discussion. But when it comes to a technical comparison the GAP is CLEARLY a superior round.

Blind loyalty doesn't do anyone any good at any time.

P.S. I don't own a GAP.
 
The GAP is a shorter round with equal/slightly better ballistics than the ACP. That should be the END of the discussion. The GAP, as a technical matter, is superior to the ACP. You don't like that fact? Oh well.
Get into 230 grain bullets and the game changes. At standard pressure for both rounds velocities are equal. Load the ACP up to +P pressure (same pressure as GAP) and the GAP doesn't have the case capacity to keep up when using 230 grain bullets. That's a fact, Jack.
People in this thread are introducing red herrings such as "Glock's 38 doesn't hold as many rounds as SA's XD 45 (ACP)!!!" What ridiculous logic
Glock commissioned Speer to engineer the .45 GAP to put .45 ACP firepower into a 9mm frame. Glock's largest competitor at the time, Springfield Armory, engineered their frames & mags to put more rounds of .45 ACP into the same size grip. How is that a Red Herring? It's completely relevant to the discussion.
This is how one should analyze the comparison: Hypothetically, ...
That's a nice theory, but no one has actually engineered this perfect .45 GAP pistol you theorize. Here in reality .45 ACP pistols still have the same or more rounds in the same size grip.
You want to discuss availability of ammo or pistols? That's a completely different discussion.
Not at all. If you can't readily get ammo from local sources it's time to consider handloading. If guns in the caliber aren't readily available, then we don't even need to worry about ammo do we?
But when it comes to a technical comparison the GAP is CLEARLY a superior round.
Clearly until you get into heavy bullets. If you want to nit pick your favorite bullet weight then maybe it's superior. If you want a CLEARLY superior auto pistol round Norma invented it back in 1983.
 
Glock sells more GAP's than G36's my eye...

And all one has to do is search back through my posts if you think I'm a Glock fanboy...cuz I'm not.

For pure range bliss, there is only one and its spelled 1911 (it also does quite well in the CCW role)

The G36 doesn't fit my hand all that great, its not quite as accurate as my 1911 (but it IS accurate), and its just plain butt ugly...but its also VERY easy to carry, conceal, and shoot...yes, easy to shoot...I had to learn to shoot it, it took me about 1,500 rounds to get the hang of the trigger and reset, and to get used to the way it felt in my hand...

But now....hehehe, lets just say it does its job in fine fashion...and that job is "a CCW that can be treated rough without me losing sleep over it". Its accurate, reliable, powerful even with the short barrel, and light weight. I carry my G36 with me all over this country (OTR truck driver) and enjoy every minute of it...it is a purpose built CCW pistol.

Reading on the internet didn't sell me on the G36...the pistol did that with its performance. (I don't care for any of the other Glock 45's, they are too thick)


The 45 GAP...wasn't an entirely bad idea, it just wasn't needed (or wanted) by enough folks...ole' Gaston overestimated the market.
 
Last edited:
"NEED"?

When questions are asked about GAP, I always see most responses being it's not needed.
If you shoot it well and better than 45acp then it's needed. There are a plethora of different calibers out there - how many of them are there a NEED for and who determines that and by what criteria. This is a spurious answer to GAP questions.

As far as the round being developed for one manufactuer: do you know what the ACP stands for in 45ACP? :

"Automatic Colt Pistols".


There can be many good reasons for not choosing the GAP. I posted I sold mine due to expense. But "Needed" or "Not Needed" or that Glock makes it for Glocks are not good ones.
 
Get into 230 grain bullets and the game changes. At standard pressure for both rounds velocities are equal. Load the ACP up to +P pressure (same pressure as GAP) and the GAP doesn't have the case capacity to keep up when using 230 grain bullets. That's a fact, Jack.

Now you're talking 45 ACP+P, which is a nice sleight of hand trick, but you're still wrong. While most ammunition manufacturers don't push the GAP to ACP+P levels in 230gr loads, a handloader can do it pretty easily. See here: http://web.archive.org/web/20100528165020/http://home.comcast.net/~petej/45gap.45acp.plusp.htm

Glock commissioned Speer to engineer the .45 GAP to put .45 ACP firepower into a 9mm frame. Glock's largest competitor at the time, Springfield Armory, engineered their frames & mags to put more rounds of .45 ACP into the same size grip. How is that a Red Herring? It's completely relevant to the discussion.

It's a red herring because your point is a distraction and doesn't illustrate ANYTHING relevant to the discussion, which is "What advantages does the GAP have over the ACP?" Just because Glock's GAP offering (supposedly) doesn't maximize the advantages does not mean those advantages don't exist. Plus, even in your example, the 38's grip circumference is smaller than the XD's--so you STILL lose the argument even when using your own examples.

That's a nice theory, but no one has actually engineered this perfect .45 GAP pistol you theorize. Here in reality .45 ACP pistols still have the same or more rounds in the same size grip.

See above. Still irrelevant even if you were correct (which you aren't). 45ACP pistol in your example has a larger grip than the G38.

Not at all. If you can't readily get ammo from local sources it's time to consider handloading. If guns in the caliber aren't readily available, then we don't even need to worry about ammo do we?

Maybe you'd have a point if your point were grounded in reality. It's not. GAP pistols and ammunition are "readily available". Practically anyone in the US can have a GAP pistol and ammunition within a matter of days even if their local shop doesn't stock them. Bud's Gun Shop, GalleryOfGuns, Impact Guns, etc etc. stock GAP pistols. GAP ammo can be found practically everywhere.

Clearly until you get into heavy bullets. If you want to nit pick your favorite bullet weight then maybe it's superior. If you want a CLEARLY superior auto pistol round Norma invented it back in 1983.

Up to 230gr, the GAP is better than the ACP hands down. If you start talking ACP+P vs. GAP, they're on an even playing field, but the GAP is still a shorter round. It's simply a better cartridge in almost every aspect, PERIOD. The ACP is over a century old, it's not embedded with magic. I don't know why people can't shake themselves of this notion.

As to the 10mm, no arguments here on its superiority.
 
Now you're talking 45 ACP+P, which is a nice sleight of hand trick, but you're still wrong. While most ammunition manufacturers don't push the GAP to ACP+P levels in 230gr loads, a handloader can do it pretty easily.
Well if we're talking handloads I can push .45 ACP past SAAMI specs too. I can also get SAAMI spec factory ammo with bullets over 230 gr. in .45 ACP. Nice try though.
Plus, even in your example, the 38's grip circumference is smaller than the XD's--so you STILL lose the argument even when using your own examples.
We must be looking at different measurements then.
Still irrelevant
It's relevant until your theory becomes reality.
GAP ammo can be found practically everywhere.
Not in rural areas.
It's simply a better cartridge in almost every aspect, PERIOD.
No it's not. See above.
 
Well if we're talking handloads I can push .45 ACP past SAAMI specs too. I can also get SAAMI spec factory ammo with bullets over 230 gr. in .45 ACP. Nice try though.

If you had actually read the contents of the link, the handloads stay within SAAMI specs. So, the nice try is yours.......again. Up to 230gr a GAP round pushed to its SAAMI spec limits matches the ACP+P pushed to its limits and easily surpasses ACP.

It's relevant until your theory becomes reality.

"My theory" already is a reality. You conveniently compare apples to oranges with XD vs. Glock models. What about Glock to Glock or BETTER YET compare your beloved XD in GAP and XD in ACP. It's already exists. The XD in GAP has a noticeably smaller grip circumference than the XD in ACP. How about that? The ACP cannot do what the GAP does in your beloved XD platform. EOS.

Not in rural areas.

OK. Great point. I guess if you get rural enough NOTHING can be found and you then have a great compelling argument against every cartridge created. This is such a non issue. If you live in Bowlegs, Oklahoma, you can still call MidwayUSA and have a crate of GAP ammo delivered to your doorstep the next day.

You really don't have a valid point at all. You have been reduced to resorting to apples-oranges comparisons and "you can't get the ammo in rural areas". That's all you have. That's not my definition of a compelling argument.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top