Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

50mm Objective on Mule Deer Rifle?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Longrifle2506, Apr 27, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Longrifle2506

    Longrifle2506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    154
    Location:
    Ohio River Valley
    I always let 40mm objectives set the standard for any of my lightweight hunting rifles. However, I just got back a scope that I used to own. It's a Burris Signature Series; 3-12x50mm; It has Adjustable Parallax. I bought it in 1994 when I was 17 years old. It went on a beanfield rifle. I sold the whole set up about a few years ago; and I just got the scope back on trade.

    I swear to you guys the optical quality of this 1994 Burris Signature Scope is the best I've ever seen. I guess I took the quality for granted when I owned in my younger years. But I've been a loyal Bushnell Elite 4200 man, and I just recently bought a Leupold VX3 which I'm plenty happy with. But I have never seen image quality like in this Burris; and it may simply be because it has adjustable parallax and my other hunting scopes do not. I compare all my scopes by looking at a huge $350,000 house which is across a field about 600 yards or so. And the Burris Signature blows me away. I recently bought Optilock mounts for my Sako Finnlight and they will allow 48 to 56mm Obj; and I was thinking; since this will be the rifle I will take on my future western mule deer hunting adventures; I would love to have this quality scope on my Sako. I could really use that clear parallax free image quality when looking at live targets at extended ranges. I know it's very solid and accurate; because when it was on the heavy barrel 22-250; I made several shots on prairie dogs in the 350-yard range and the zero never moved. It just seems like it would make a heck of a scope on that Sako; Also, the Sako is 25-06; and some might say the Burris is a big or long scope; but at least the 25-06 is long action; so it would look a lot better on my Sako than on a Short action; I suppose.

    What do you guys think of a 50mm on a Mule Deer Rifle? Is 10 more millimeters "No big Deal"; or is it "Too big and bulky for a hunting rifle." I appreciate everyone who can weigh in on this; especially those of you with Mule deer hunting experience. I see online that the majority of hunters don't like much bigger than a 40 or 42mm Objective. But I don't mind a little more scope. I want that scope on my Sako in a bad way; but I would like to hear any disadvantages that may exist; what about Advantages? Thanks guys
     
  2. fireman 9731

    fireman 9731 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,198
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Mount it on there and see. If it isn't too heavy, and balances well then use it. Your guns should make you happy, not other people.
     
  3. dprice3844444

    dprice3844444 member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,264
    Location:
    se fla i love claymores 01/sot
    better light gathering in low light conditions,and burris is a good name in quality scopes.use it.trijicon makes a nice 3x9x56 i think
     
  4. R H Clark

    R H Clark Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2011
    Messages:
    323
    Location:
    Alabama
    The only reason I like smaller objective scopes is because I can mount them lower for better cheek weld.Since you are using higher rings,take advantage of the 50mm as long as it balances well for you.
     
  5. greyling22

    greyling22 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,427
    Location:
    East Texas
    I read that supposedly a 50 mm objective is more prone to breakage since there is more mass in the glass to be jarred around my recoil. And they're bigger and heavier. beyond that, they gather a little more light.

    If you don't mind the size, use it.
     
  6. Coltdriver

    Coltdriver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,202
    Location:
    Colorado
    I recently picked up a fixed 8 power scope with a 56 mm objective.

    That big objective has the potential but the glass must be up to the task. Sounds like you have a nice clear scope.

    You want to put it to a real test, not that you will hunt at night, but take just the scope out at night and see if you can see that house well. I have about the same situation and with this scope under a partial moon I can clearly see details of a house that is also about 600 yards away.

    Everything is bright during the day but if it works for you well under moonlight then you know you have one that will serve you at both ends of the legal hunting window.

    As for the larger bell its less than an inch larger, about a quarter inch to a side. Mine lines right up when I shoulder the rifle.

    I have never cared for AO scopes. I had one but my experience hunting is that you stalk, spot and take your shot. I never have had the leisure of setting the parallax. But that is just me.

    I think the key to where the scope sits is in what you like. The field is different from the bench!
     
  7. finnwolf64

    finnwolf64 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    61
    Location:
    Down Under
    I'm 47 years old & have been hunting for most of those years. Most of my hunting rifles have Leupold variables with 40mm objectives. I had always been aware of the need to mount a scope as low as possible & have been happy with 40mm objectives. A lot of gun writers in magazines also state that you shouldn't go larger than 40mm objective because of gun balance & the need to quickly focus with a deer hunting set-up.
    I bought a new Sako .308 Bavarian a couple of years ago & ordered the scope from a different shop. Although I'd ordered a 2.5-10x40mm Kahles scope, I actually received a 50mm objective. For years I had been lecturing people on the merits of using scopes with 40mm objective or under for deer hunting, but after using the Kahles 2.5-10x50mm I've been converted.
    The 50mm objective is noticeably clearer at dawn & dusk, & for me is just as quick to shoulder & focus. I jumped a deer at around 25 yards last year & snap shot it through the heart ,at a full run with the Kahles 50mm set on 2.5x. I also use this combination for pig hunting in thick cover & again have noticed no detriment when compared to my 40mm objective scopes.
    Prior to a recent deer hunting trip I had all my mates gear & rifles stored at my place, as we were using my vehicle for transportation. I carried out a comparison between 36mm, 40mm & 50mm scopes & the difference the 50mm objective gave especially at night was amazing.
    While I won't be swapping the 40mm objective Leupolds from my existing hunting rifles, you certainly won't be disadvantaged by going for a 50mm & may actually prefer it.
     
  8. redneck2

    redneck2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    11,062
    Location:
    Northern Indiana
    I think this is one thing most people overlook. If you don't set it to the proper range, notice how much different the clarity and focus is.

    I just got two new VX-3's. Both have AO.

    I just put my 3x12x50 Burris Black Diamond on my .308 for pronghorn. I'm looking to make me happy, not a bunch of strangers on the internet.
     
  9. Taurus 617 CCW

    Taurus 617 CCW Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,617
    Location:
    Northern Idaho
    I hunt whitetail with a Simmons 3-9x50 scope. I attribute the weight more to the wood stock than the scope. It has served me well.
     
  10. dprice3844444

    dprice3844444 member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,264
    Location:
    se fla i love claymores 01/sot
    most all the scopes now made by the major scope manufacturers are 50 bmg rated.the 50 lense would have more flexibility than a 40mm depending on plastic or glass.if it breaks a 50mm,it will slso break any other lense,which means poor opticals in the first place.
     
  11. Sav .250

    Sav .250 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,506
    Location:
    Central Fla
    Seeing as how you asked. If you can get it mounted up ok, why not.
    As for me, it would not be my choice.
     
  12. moxie

    moxie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,069
    Location:
    Erath Co., TX
    1. Who cares how it "looks?" The mulie?

    2. It's obvious you love the scope. Mount it on your Sako and try it out. If it handles and shoots well, it's a happy marriage!
     
  13. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,327
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    I don't care for the weight and bulk and don't like how high a +50mm objective scope must be mounted. But then again, I wouldn't use a 3-12x50AO on a big game rifle either.
     
  14. Boxhead

    Boxhead Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    Bouncing between Geoje Korea, The Texas Hill Count
    My big (non-dangerous) game hunting rifles wear 2.5-8x-36's, 2-7x-33's and 1.75-32's and I have never needed more. This on deer, hogs, exotics, elk, moose, black and grizzly bear and African critters to eland. I build my rifles light in weight and the Leupold's above fill the need to perfection. I have never had a problem shooting in legal light.
     
  15. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,447
    Location:
    Georgia
    I wouldn't go out and buy a 50, but if you have it, like it and want to use it I would. The top end Burris scopes are very good.

    I personally like 40mm or smaller. A 50 lets in more light, but most is wasted because the human eye cannot take advantage of it. A 40mm scope set at 8X transmits exactly the same amount of light to your eyes as a 50mm scope set at 10X. Either scope set at 8x or less lets in more light than the human eye can use.

    The quality of the glass is more important than size. Bigger lenses offer an advantage only when used past legal shooting time and when set at very high magnification. I've always been able to see well enough to make a shot with a quality 40mm glass long after I could legally do so.
     
  16. Longrifle2506

    Longrifle2506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    154
    Location:
    Ohio River Valley
    It's very nice to see so many replies. I'm all for "making me happy,"; I just like a little bit of reassurance. I hope the Burris fits OK on the Sako. Sako only makes the Optilok Ring Mounts in "LOW" height; but their LOW height will mount a 48 to 56mm Objective. I think it's because European hunters are obsessed with 50mm or larger. I spent like; I think it was around $170 on the OptiLok mounts; so if the Burris doesn't fit I have to just remount my Bushnell ELite 4200 2.5-10x40mm.

    FinnWolf, I thought you were gonna be a hard core 40mm man the way your post started off; I was surprised to see that you were converted after getting that 50mm Kahles. I'm sold on the idea of mounting my Burris on the Sako; I just hope it fits without the objective touching the barrel.

    When I see the Mule Deer Hunting Videos; many times the deer are spotted at very long distances. Guy Eastman spotted one at 5 miles with a spotting scope. But that's extreme. I just think it would be nice to have that Burris on a Mule Deer Hunt because at long ranges like that; i would be better than any other scope I have anyway. And I can eliminate Parallax. When I look at the house across the field with the Burris; it's so much clearer than other my other scopes; for that reason alone I would like that scope on the Sako.

    Thanks a lot guys.
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2012
  17. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,327
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    European hunters can take advantage of the light transmission, we can't.

    Scopes are for sighting, binoculars and spotting scopes are for spotting. I would never scope a rifle with big glass with the intention of using it for spotting game, for myriad reasons.
     
  18. Longrifle2506

    Longrifle2506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    154
    Location:
    Ohio River Valley
    That's something else I should ask about; is a spotting scope "a must" for mule deer spotting; or can I get buy with my Minox 10x40 Binoculars? I don't own a spotting scope yet.
     
  19. Bushpilot

    Bushpilot Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    598
    I have grown to really like adjustable objectives but prefer a smaller objectives lens rather than a larger. This is mostly because it can be mounted lower which I think makes a rifle easier to shoot well. I also like a smaller scope on a hunting rifle because it makes the whole package lighter and less bulky.
     
  20. redneck2

    redneck2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    11,062
    Location:
    Northern Indiana
    I've only been on one hunt out west. Pronghorn hunted for two days and PD hunted the other two. I had a moderate quality spotting scope. Used it the second day to judge the size of the one we were after.

    I have no idea how good of quality your binos are, but I quickly figured out that my pocket sized Pentax didn't cut it. As soon as I got back, I started looking for GOOD full sized ones. I got some Leupold 10x50 Mojave 3's.

    IMO, good binos are about 10x more important than a spotting scope. The two mulies we saw were less than 200 yards. Just the way it worked out. Didn't matter, as we didn't have tags anyway.

    We used our binos constantly. We had four wheelers on private ground. If I were walking, I wouldn't take the extra bulk and weight of the spotting scope. I had plenty of room and already had the scope, but I wouldn't buy one just for the trip. They are nice at the range to check targets. Saves a lot of walking.

    I got one of the bino harnesses that holds them from flopping around and covers the lenses
     
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2012
  21. sage5907

    sage5907 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,282
    Location:
    Wild & Free Oklahoma
    Longrifle2506, I just want to remind you that there are two issues on a mule deer rifle scope that are more important than a 50 MM objective. First, the weight is important. A scope that weighs 12 ounces is far more desirable than one that weighs 20 ounces. And secondly, don't forget about a scope with a 30 mm tube. To me a scope with a 30 mm tube and a 40 mm objective is far more desirable than one with a 1 inch tube and 50 mm objective. BW
     
  22. X-Rap

    X-Rap Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,651
    An important matter that needs to be pointed out about optics is compatibility, by this I mean you will suffer if your spotting scope quality far exceeds that of your scope or binos and on down the line.
    I have used pretty good glass for the last 25 yrs and can say that when one leg of the stool comes up short it can make a huge difference. More than once I have seen animals in low light that were easy to distinguish with my 10x50 Swaro's but when I tried to find the one I wanted in my scope it was hopeless, same happened last year only I was just spotting for deer and brought what on their own seem like a good pair of Burris 10x42 binos but when switching from my spotting scope to the binos I couldn't find the deer on the mountainside at longer distances.
    Beware the cheap rifle scope with the high magnification, big tube or bell, if the glass is cheap it doesn't matter. Same really goes for all optics, compare and used them side by side if at all possible.
     
  23. Longrifle2506

    Longrifle2506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Messages:
    154
    Location:
    Ohio River Valley
    I don't go lower than Leupold's Best, Burris's Best, and Bushnells Best. I stick with the top of the line with all three companies and the quality is very acceptable to me with all three of these companies. If I need a cheap scope, I'll go with a weaver Classic variable which are made in Japan by the same people who make Bushnell Elite.

    Well Guys, I don't know what Sako's thinking by saying a 48-56mm Objective will fit with those rings. I mean to tell you that a 40mm barely has clearance!! So I went with a scope I had bought recently; it was brand new in the box still. I never mentioned it before. It's a Burris Signature Select 3-10x40mm and it mounted up so perfect, it's got just enough clearance to slide a flip up cap on the objective. I really like how it turned out.

    I actually have a very good pairs of binos. The Minox are made in Germany by Leica and they are better than my cousin's Zeiss binos in my opinion. The Minox are good enough to look through them all day long without any noticeable eye strain.

    I think I will just keep the Burris Signature 3-12x50mm put up in a box and save it for a future heavy barrel rifle. I think it would be a good scope for a Beanfield rifle.
     
  24. redneck2

    redneck2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    11,062
    Location:
    Northern Indiana
    As I said before, I already had the spotting scope so I took it. Optics looked acceptable until you looked thru a really good set of binos. Then you could see how milky the glass is. Doesn't help that the scope is 20-60x, so the lower quality is really magnified.
     
  25. CountryUgly

    CountryUgly Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    613
    Location:
    The Dirty South
    If you like it use it. FYI your eye can only use a certain amount of light and the 50mm does not give you any light gathering advantage over a 40mm.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page