68% of Connecticut police on the list

Status
Not open for further replies.

Longarrow

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
2
Connecticut halts plans to round up firearms after finding most cops in the state are on the list

Connecticut has been making news due to their hastily passed gun registration laws. According to some sources as few as 15% of gun owners have actually registered their firearms. News Blogs have been warning state officials are talking about mass confiscations of the unregistered firearms.

Plans for these confiscations hit a snag when a legislative intern dared to ask a question. “Who will be going door to door to take all the guns away?” asked the 21-year-old college senior.

Reportedly multiple people in the room in the most sarcastic voices they could muster said “the police”.

The unnamed intern then pointed at the list and said, “my dad’s name is on the list, and he is the police chief. I see three other names on this list of family members, all cops.”

With in hours a print off of all sworn Law Enforcement officers in the state was obtained. Comparisons of the list of gun owners who failed to comply with registration requirements and sworn LEOs showed a startling figure. Just over 68% of Connecticut cops had failed to register firearms according to the new law.

An anonymous source in the Governors office said lawmakers were dumbfounded. “Someone suggest firing all the cops who failed to register. But the reality of hiring and training that many new police officers is not practical.” The source goes on to say “Senator [redacted to protect our source] said maybe we should issue an official order to all cops to comply with registration or face termination. I mean seriously these people are a special kind of stupid to think that gun-loving cops are going to go along with this blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment.”

So now Connecticut is in little quagmire. The powers that be are making all kinds of threats, but there is no one to follow through on the threats.

No police officers or police administrators were willing to go on record for this story. Emails to members of the Connecticut legislator and Governors office were not returned by the time of publication.

Source here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Disclaimer at bottom of page: "This site is a satire of the current state of Law Enforcement, Fire Fighting and Emergency Medical work. Stories posted here are not real and you should not assume them to have any basis in any real fact. More ..."

This is supposedly a disclaimer for CallTheCops.Net which also links to apparently legit LE, FF, EM sites.

But it is the Onion and MAD Magazine for LE, FF, EM stories:

Call The Cops
America's 27th Most Trusted Source for Public Safety News
Our Latest 12% Factual Headlines
Cardiac arrest victim suing 1st responders for saving his life
Connecticut halts plans to round up firearms after finding most cops in the state are on the list
State Trooper makes traffic stop, issues verbal warning
After massacre in China, Knife control and registration priority for US Law makers.
Austin Police Hipster program is like totally yesterday

Which 12% of the CT stories is factual though?
 
Last edited:
Some people really need to work on their mental filter for processing stuff they read online. :banghead:
 
Considering people voted against Sara Palin based on Tina Fey's portrayal on Satuday Night Live, yep.

On the other hand, I trust The Onion and MAD Magazine more than I trust DNC or RNC.
 
The story is bogus, I posted it in Legal earlier on THR and then found it was "satire" and asked the mods to delete the thread.




http://www.callthecops.net/about-us/
"About Us

Call the Cops

This site is a satire of the current state of Law Enforcement, Fire Fighting and Emergency Medical work. Stories posted here are not real and you should not assume them to have any basis in any real fact. Heck we tend to leave in spelling and grammer errors just to prove we is not the professional media. No reference of an individual, company, or government entity seeks to inflict malice or emotional harm.

Any statement made by authors on this page should not be considered the opinions of agencies they are employed by."



Can I suggest the mods close or delete the thread?

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top