Arizona_Mike
Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2013
- Messages
- 3,452
Who is treading on this ice? The law is clear.Treading on thin ice ........never good.
Mike
Who is treading on this ice? The law is clear.Treading on thin ice ........never good.
Who is treading on this ice? The law is clear.
Mike
Barring that, some factual paperwork outlining the regulations might help. I always keep a photocopy of transfers with my Class 3 stuff when I'm out and about.My thought is that if I had a home-built, I would have a very sincere serial number on it. There wouldn't be a sales or permit record of it anywhere, but a conventional looking number and maybe even a brand name could defuse a lot of tension if you came to official notice.
I have no idea which poster you were referring to so I'm no where near an argument myselfI`m not trying to start an argument. Just A comment.
Who is treading on this ice? The law is clear.
Mike
Now I'm really confused! Bullseye did not mention either of those things in his two posts.Mike, I think the treading thin ice comment was directed at the OP's post on FA, sears, etc... on a home built.
It was DustyGmt. If he as asking about an RDIAS I'm pretty sure you could.Nope, wasn't me.
Could you manufacture a lower with an auto sear and fire FA?
Unless the day comes that Hughes is tossed out.was not registered by 1986 it is not, and can not ever be, legal for personal ownership.
Homebuilt guns have to follow exactly the same rules as factory built ones, except for the requirement for a serial number. If they didn't, we'd all be building machine guns. And silencers. And bazookas.Ya I didn't think it likely. I just didn't know to what extent if to any extent these home built rifles were reg'd.