You did a better job then the other person, but I give a B at best to your effort.
Yes I am saying that if something is in the constitution is should never, ever be changed
This seems to have been addressed already
Again this is irrelevant because the right to fry your brain on acid and then go rob a store so you can afford to do it again is no where in the constitution the right to own a weapon is
You used the wrong choice of drugs here. Acid is cheap and non addictive, plus it's effects last for several hours. It is highly unlikely someone would rob a store for money to buy acid. Crack, coke or heroin would be much better examples in this situation. All these drugs are addictive and the effects don't last long so it can get expensive. Coke and heroin users can build up habits that cost hundreds of dollars a day to feed. If anyone took $100 worth of acid in a day they'd end up in a mental istitution for life.
A woman who gets raped and wants to have an abortion… a classic response to a call to end the slaughter of children, in response I ask is it the child’s fault that his father raped this woman? Why kill the child for the sins of the father?
I'll quote, "I the LORD your God am a jealous god, punishing the children for the sins of their fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me..."
It would appear the God himself punishes children for the sins of their fathers. If God can use hurricanes, earthquakes volcanoes and other natural phenomena to carry out his will, as many Christians believe, then couldn't he also use abortion as a way to carry out his will?
but abortion is murder and that simply is not even worthy of debate
This is an absolutist position that I will counter with Biblical evidence, as most people who say abortion is murder use the Bible to support their arguements. I wrote a paper on this in college so I'll just copy and paste pieces, sorry if it's a little long.
"There is no law or teaching in the bible that specifically says that abortion is a sin, but there are a few laws that deal with an unborn child. The first instance comes in Exodus in chapter 23 verses 22-25. These verses state that if two men quarreling accidentally hit a pregnant women and cause a miscarriage, but the woman is not seriously injured, her husband will decide on compensation. However, if the women is seriously injured the punishment for the offender will be equal to the injuries of the woman. A possible interpretation of this may be the unborn child is not yet considered a person. If this is the case than it is possible to argue that abortion is not morally wrong.
The second set of verses that talk about an unborn child is Leviticus 5:11-31. Here, if a man thinks his wife may have been unfaithful, he can take her before a priest. The priest will then perform a ritual. If the child is her husband’s then nothing will happen to her. If the child is not her husband’s she will have a miscarriage and a barren womb. One possible interpretation of these verses is if a pregnant woman’s unborn child is not her husband’s, it is possible to have an abortion."
Equal rights does not mean...Nor does it mean that I have to allow someone to do something I find abhorrent in my town providing that particular act is not protected by the constitution.
Where are you going with this? If someone is doing something in your town that you find abhorrent and it is a legal activity, btw it can be legal and not protected by the Constitution, you'd damn well better allow it. Smoking cigarettes for instance. Many find this activity abhorrent, it is not protected by the constitution, yet are you going to say I can't smoke inside my own house if I live in your town? Now who is trying to trample who's freedom? Some people find certain sexual activities between a man and a woman to be abhorrent, I'm avoiding homesexual sex here on purpose. Who's going to be the sex police now to make sure that those activities of a consenting man and a consenting woman don't take place?
These were just a few thought's that came to mind while reading your post. I didn't post them to try and put you down, but simply to allow you to adjust some arguements, if you so choose.