481
Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2009
- Messages
- 2,418
If you become fact-minded first try to learn something from the tensile strength tests of various tissues presented in research that I previously mentioned; however, if you still adhere to the false notion that you repeatedly expressed over time about necessity and sufficiency of bulk modulus and sonic velocity equivalency to insure simulant "equivalency" to soft-tissue, then no findings will be relevant.
Another persistent attempt at redirection from the actual topic does not make your failure to provide your proclaimed test results in support "of better correlation of tensile/shear forces in properly prepared wet pack and tissue overall" disappear. You can continue to try to "talk past" what you've offered up-and failed to provide-as evidence in post #251, but it still remains.